Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > NATO’s “Global Partners” in Asia

Research

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

NATO’s “Global Partners” in Asia: Shifting Strategic Narratives

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

NATO’s “Global Partners” in Asia: Shifting Strategic Narratives. / Burton, J.
In: Asian Security, Vol. 14, No. 1, 31.12.2018, p. 8-23.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Burton, J 2018, 'NATO’s “Global Partners” in Asia: Shifting Strategic Narratives', Asian Security, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 8-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2017.1361728

APA

Burton, J. (2018). NATO’s “Global Partners” in Asia: Shifting Strategic Narratives. Asian Security, 14(1), 8-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2017.1361728

Vancouver

Burton J. NATO’s “Global Partners” in Asia: Shifting Strategic Narratives. Asian Security. 2018 Dec 31;14(1):8-23. Epub 2017 Sept 11. doi: 10.1080/14799855.2017.1361728

Author

Burton, J. / NATO’s “Global Partners” in Asia : Shifting Strategic Narratives. In: Asian Security. 2018 ; Vol. 14, No. 1. pp. 8-23.

Bibtex

@article{3feeaac5c89c412cb5694ba5f917bd00,
title = "NATO{\textquoteright}s “Global Partners” in Asia: Shifting Strategic Narratives",
abstract = "This article analyzes how NATO officials perceive the Alliance{\textquoteright}s global partnerships with Australia, New Zealand, Mongolia, South Korea, and Japan. In doing so, it seeks to establish the degree of conformity within the alliance about how useful and important the partnerships are, and connectedly, how NATO{\textquoteright}s strategic narrative about its global security role is changing. The article argues that while NATO is committed to maintaining links with each of the countries analyzed, a process of retrenchment can be identified within the alliance, driven by the Russian annexation of Crimea in 2014 and a deteriorating security environment in the Middle East and North Africa. This is reflected in new strategic narratives within the alliance that focus on NATO{\textquoteright}s eastern and southern flanks.",
author = "J. Burton",
year = "2018",
month = dec,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1080/14799855.2017.1361728",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "8--23",
journal = "Asian Security",
issn = "1479-9855",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - NATO’s “Global Partners” in Asia

T2 - Shifting Strategic Narratives

AU - Burton, J.

PY - 2018/12/31

Y1 - 2018/12/31

N2 - This article analyzes how NATO officials perceive the Alliance’s global partnerships with Australia, New Zealand, Mongolia, South Korea, and Japan. In doing so, it seeks to establish the degree of conformity within the alliance about how useful and important the partnerships are, and connectedly, how NATO’s strategic narrative about its global security role is changing. The article argues that while NATO is committed to maintaining links with each of the countries analyzed, a process of retrenchment can be identified within the alliance, driven by the Russian annexation of Crimea in 2014 and a deteriorating security environment in the Middle East and North Africa. This is reflected in new strategic narratives within the alliance that focus on NATO’s eastern and southern flanks.

AB - This article analyzes how NATO officials perceive the Alliance’s global partnerships with Australia, New Zealand, Mongolia, South Korea, and Japan. In doing so, it seeks to establish the degree of conformity within the alliance about how useful and important the partnerships are, and connectedly, how NATO’s strategic narrative about its global security role is changing. The article argues that while NATO is committed to maintaining links with each of the countries analyzed, a process of retrenchment can be identified within the alliance, driven by the Russian annexation of Crimea in 2014 and a deteriorating security environment in the Middle East and North Africa. This is reflected in new strategic narratives within the alliance that focus on NATO’s eastern and southern flanks.

U2 - 10.1080/14799855.2017.1361728

DO - 10.1080/14799855.2017.1361728

M3 - Journal article

VL - 14

SP - 8

EP - 23

JO - Asian Security

JF - Asian Security

SN - 1479-9855

IS - 1

ER -