Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Navigating Complex Buildings
View graph of relations

Navigating Complex Buildings: Cognition, Neuroscience and Architectural Design

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter

Published

Standard

Navigating Complex Buildings: Cognition, Neuroscience and Architectural Design. / Dalton, Ruth; Hoelscher, Christoph; Spiers, Hugo.
Studying Visual and Spatial Reasoning for Design Creativity. ed. / John Gero. Germany: Springer, 2015. p. 3-22.

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter

Harvard

Dalton, R, Hoelscher, C & Spiers, H 2015, Navigating Complex Buildings: Cognition, Neuroscience and Architectural Design. in J Gero (ed.), Studying Visual and Spatial Reasoning for Design Creativity. Springer, Germany, pp. 3-22. <https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9789401792967>

APA

Dalton, R., Hoelscher, C., & Spiers, H. (2015). Navigating Complex Buildings: Cognition, Neuroscience and Architectural Design. In J. Gero (Ed.), Studying Visual and Spatial Reasoning for Design Creativity (pp. 3-22). Springer. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9789401792967

Vancouver

Dalton R, Hoelscher C, Spiers H. Navigating Complex Buildings: Cognition, Neuroscience and Architectural Design. In Gero J, editor, Studying Visual and Spatial Reasoning for Design Creativity. Germany: Springer. 2015. p. 3-22

Author

Dalton, Ruth ; Hoelscher, Christoph ; Spiers, Hugo. / Navigating Complex Buildings : Cognition, Neuroscience and Architectural Design. Studying Visual and Spatial Reasoning for Design Creativity. editor / John Gero. Germany : Springer, 2015. pp. 3-22

Bibtex

@inbook{c356ecd5d5e74a0baf468ac5ff6ad8ee,
title = "Navigating Complex Buildings: Cognition, Neuroscience and Architectural Design",
abstract = "In recent years, interest has been sparked by the overlap between architecture and neuroscience (Eberhard, 2009; 2007; Mallgrave 2010). The majority of this research appears to focus on either one of two areas: how building users experience architecture and how this may affect them emotionally or, alternatively, on the creative process of architectural design: how architects design buildings and what happens at the neurological level, during the creative act. In Eberhard{\textquoteright}s 2009 article in Neuron, he describes the five broad areas that are studied in neuroscience as being: 1)sensation and perception, 2) learning and memory, 3) decision making, emotion and affect, and 4)movement or “how do we interact with our environment and navigate through it?” (Ibid. p.755). It can be seen that the majority of research hitherto undertaken on the boundaries between neuroscience and architecture fit into the first and fourth of these areas. This paper, in contrary to these other approaches, firmly concentrates on this latter area of study. To some extents, we are also addressing the third area, namely decision making, but only insofar as it is part of the act of wayfinding and navigation.",
author = "Ruth Dalton and Christoph Hoelscher and Hugo Spiers",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
isbn = "9789401792967",
pages = "3--22",
editor = "John Gero",
booktitle = "Studying Visual and Spatial Reasoning for Design Creativity",
publisher = "Springer",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Navigating Complex Buildings

T2 - Cognition, Neuroscience and Architectural Design

AU - Dalton, Ruth

AU - Hoelscher, Christoph

AU - Spiers, Hugo

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - In recent years, interest has been sparked by the overlap between architecture and neuroscience (Eberhard, 2009; 2007; Mallgrave 2010). The majority of this research appears to focus on either one of two areas: how building users experience architecture and how this may affect them emotionally or, alternatively, on the creative process of architectural design: how architects design buildings and what happens at the neurological level, during the creative act. In Eberhard’s 2009 article in Neuron, he describes the five broad areas that are studied in neuroscience as being: 1)sensation and perception, 2) learning and memory, 3) decision making, emotion and affect, and 4)movement or “how do we interact with our environment and navigate through it?” (Ibid. p.755). It can be seen that the majority of research hitherto undertaken on the boundaries between neuroscience and architecture fit into the first and fourth of these areas. This paper, in contrary to these other approaches, firmly concentrates on this latter area of study. To some extents, we are also addressing the third area, namely decision making, but only insofar as it is part of the act of wayfinding and navigation.

AB - In recent years, interest has been sparked by the overlap between architecture and neuroscience (Eberhard, 2009; 2007; Mallgrave 2010). The majority of this research appears to focus on either one of two areas: how building users experience architecture and how this may affect them emotionally or, alternatively, on the creative process of architectural design: how architects design buildings and what happens at the neurological level, during the creative act. In Eberhard’s 2009 article in Neuron, he describes the five broad areas that are studied in neuroscience as being: 1)sensation and perception, 2) learning and memory, 3) decision making, emotion and affect, and 4)movement or “how do we interact with our environment and navigate through it?” (Ibid. p.755). It can be seen that the majority of research hitherto undertaken on the boundaries between neuroscience and architecture fit into the first and fourth of these areas. This paper, in contrary to these other approaches, firmly concentrates on this latter area of study. To some extents, we are also addressing the third area, namely decision making, but only insofar as it is part of the act of wayfinding and navigation.

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9789401792967

SP - 3

EP - 22

BT - Studying Visual and Spatial Reasoning for Design Creativity

A2 - Gero, John

PB - Springer

CY - Germany

ER -