Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Navigating Love in a Post-Pandemic World

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Navigating Love in a Post-Pandemic World: Understanding Young Adults’ Views on Short- and Long-Term Romantic Relationships

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Navigating Love in a Post-Pandemic World: Understanding Young Adults’ Views on Short- and Long-Term Romantic Relationships. / Mengzhen, L.; Lim, D.H.J.; Berezina, E. et al.
In: Archives of Sexual Behavior, Vol. 53, No. 2, 29.02.2024, p. 497-510.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Mengzhen L, Lim DHJ, Berezina E, Benjamin J. Navigating Love in a Post-Pandemic World: Understanding Young Adults’ Views on Short- and Long-Term Romantic Relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2024 Feb 29;53(2):497-510. Epub 2023 Nov 20. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02738-9

Author

Mengzhen, L. ; Lim, D.H.J. ; Berezina, E. et al. / Navigating Love in a Post-Pandemic World : Understanding Young Adults’ Views on Short- and Long-Term Romantic Relationships. In: Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2024 ; Vol. 53, No. 2. pp. 497-510.

Bibtex

@article{f8b260f06d1a47308a242e55eb274c46,
title = "Navigating Love in a Post-Pandemic World: Understanding Young Adults{\textquoteright} Views on Short- and Long-Term Romantic Relationships",
abstract = "The uncertain future due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the technological advancements may have altered young adults' experiences of romantic relationships. It is unclear whether individuals will continue to prefer traditional long-term romantic relationships (LTRR) or opt for short-term ones (STRR). This research describes how young adults in Malaysia perceive LTRR and STRR. Using the structured approach of the theory of social representations, data were collected from 512 participants; 238 (46.48%) male; Mage 21.75; majority were heterosexual and students, and analyzed using prototypical analysis to reveal high consensus elements. Five observations were made: (1) females prioritize “love” in both STRR and LTRR, while males prioritize “love” only in LTRR; (2) females prioritize “marriage” in LTRR, while males prioritize “trust,” “comfort,” and “stability.” Males do not consider “marriage” as part of a LTRR; (3) both males and females view STRR positively, while LTRR are viewed more practically; (4) “sex” is a core element in STRR but is absent in LTRR; (5) males differentiate between STRR and LTRR with no overlapping elements. These findings provide insight into the social representations of romantic relationships among young adults in Malaysia and suggest future directions for research in the field.",
author = "L. Mengzhen and D.H.J. Lim and E. Berezina and J. Benjamin",
year = "2024",
month = feb,
day = "29",
doi = "10.1007/s10508-023-02738-9",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "497--510",
journal = "Archives of Sexual Behavior",
issn = "0004-0002",
publisher = "Springer New York LLC",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Navigating Love in a Post-Pandemic World

T2 - Understanding Young Adults’ Views on Short- and Long-Term Romantic Relationships

AU - Mengzhen, L.

AU - Lim, D.H.J.

AU - Berezina, E.

AU - Benjamin, J.

PY - 2024/2/29

Y1 - 2024/2/29

N2 - The uncertain future due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the technological advancements may have altered young adults' experiences of romantic relationships. It is unclear whether individuals will continue to prefer traditional long-term romantic relationships (LTRR) or opt for short-term ones (STRR). This research describes how young adults in Malaysia perceive LTRR and STRR. Using the structured approach of the theory of social representations, data were collected from 512 participants; 238 (46.48%) male; Mage 21.75; majority were heterosexual and students, and analyzed using prototypical analysis to reveal high consensus elements. Five observations were made: (1) females prioritize “love” in both STRR and LTRR, while males prioritize “love” only in LTRR; (2) females prioritize “marriage” in LTRR, while males prioritize “trust,” “comfort,” and “stability.” Males do not consider “marriage” as part of a LTRR; (3) both males and females view STRR positively, while LTRR are viewed more practically; (4) “sex” is a core element in STRR but is absent in LTRR; (5) males differentiate between STRR and LTRR with no overlapping elements. These findings provide insight into the social representations of romantic relationships among young adults in Malaysia and suggest future directions for research in the field.

AB - The uncertain future due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the technological advancements may have altered young adults' experiences of romantic relationships. It is unclear whether individuals will continue to prefer traditional long-term romantic relationships (LTRR) or opt for short-term ones (STRR). This research describes how young adults in Malaysia perceive LTRR and STRR. Using the structured approach of the theory of social representations, data were collected from 512 participants; 238 (46.48%) male; Mage 21.75; majority were heterosexual and students, and analyzed using prototypical analysis to reveal high consensus elements. Five observations were made: (1) females prioritize “love” in both STRR and LTRR, while males prioritize “love” only in LTRR; (2) females prioritize “marriage” in LTRR, while males prioritize “trust,” “comfort,” and “stability.” Males do not consider “marriage” as part of a LTRR; (3) both males and females view STRR positively, while LTRR are viewed more practically; (4) “sex” is a core element in STRR but is absent in LTRR; (5) males differentiate between STRR and LTRR with no overlapping elements. These findings provide insight into the social representations of romantic relationships among young adults in Malaysia and suggest future directions for research in the field.

U2 - 10.1007/s10508-023-02738-9

DO - 10.1007/s10508-023-02738-9

M3 - Journal article

VL - 53

SP - 497

EP - 510

JO - Archives of Sexual Behavior

JF - Archives of Sexual Behavior

SN - 0004-0002

IS - 2

ER -