Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Necessary energy uses and a minimum standard of...

Electronic data

  • Necessary_energy_uses_and_energy_justice_final_submitted_July15

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Energy Research & Social Science. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Energy Research & Social Science, 18, 2016 DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2016.02.007

    Accepted author manuscript, 248 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Necessary energy uses and a minimum standard of living in the United Kingdom: energy justice or escalating expectations?

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>08/2016
<mark>Journal</mark>Energy Research and Social Science
Volume18
Number of pages10
Pages (from-to)129-138
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date2/03/16
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Access to affordable energy is a core dimension of energy justice, with recent work examining the relation between energy use and well-being in these terms. However, there has been relatively little examination of exactly which energy uses should be considered basic necessities within a given cultural context and so of concern for energy justice. We examine the inclusion of energy-using necessities within the outcomes of deliberative workshops with members of the public focused on defining a minimum-standard of living in the UK and repeated biannually over a six year period. Our secondary analysis shows that energy uses deemed to be necessities are diverse and plural, enabling access to multiple valued energy services, and that their profile has to some degree shifted from 2008 to 2014. The reasoning involved is multidimensional, ranging across questions of health, social participation, opportunity and practicality. We argue that public deliberations about necessities can be taken as legitimate grounding for defining minimum standards and therefore the scope of ‘doing justice’ in fuel poverty policy. However we set this in tension with how change over time reveals the escalation of norms of energy dependency in a society that on climate justice grounds must radically reduce carbon emissions.

Bibliographic note

This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Energy Research & Social Science. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Energy Research & Social Science, 18, 2016 DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2016.02.007