Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Network openness and learning ambidexterity of ...
View graph of relations

Network openness and learning ambidexterity of new technology-based firms at incubators

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

Published

Standard

Network openness and learning ambidexterity of new technology-based firms at incubators. / Soetanto, Danny.
New technology-based firms in the new millennium. ed. / Aard Groen; Gary Cook; Peter Van Der Sijde. Vol. 11 Emerald, 2015. p. 227-245.

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

Harvard

Soetanto, D 2015, Network openness and learning ambidexterity of new technology-based firms at incubators. in A Groen, G Cook & P Van Der Sijde (eds), New technology-based firms in the new millennium. vol. 11, Emerald, pp. 227-245.

APA

Soetanto, D. (2015). Network openness and learning ambidexterity of new technology-based firms at incubators. In A. Groen, G. Cook, & P. Van Der Sijde (Eds.), New technology-based firms in the new millennium (Vol. 11, pp. 227-245). Emerald.

Vancouver

Soetanto D. Network openness and learning ambidexterity of new technology-based firms at incubators. In Groen A, Cook G, Van Der Sijde P, editors, New technology-based firms in the new millennium. Vol. 11. Emerald. 2015. p. 227-245

Author

Soetanto, Danny. / Network openness and learning ambidexterity of new technology-based firms at incubators. New technology-based firms in the new millennium. editor / Aard Groen ; Gary Cook ; Peter Van Der Sijde. Vol. 11 Emerald, 2015. pp. 227-245

Bibtex

@inbook{ae70d4f7221f4b16b34cb00b0219409f,
title = "Network openness and learning ambidexterity of new technology-based firms at incubators",
abstract = "For a new technology-based firm, the ability to learn is crucial to their growth process. However, firms constantly face the challenge of maintaining the ambidexterity of two different learning activities, namely learning by exploiting existing competencies and learning through exploring new ones. The purpose of this study is to examine how small technology-based firms at incubators perform both activities. Using the index of network openness, we argue that firms perform ambidexterity by maintaining a balance between a high and low level of network openness. Our first hypothesis was constructed as firms pursuing explorative learning will develop a high level of network openness while those pursuing exploitative learning will develop a low level of network openness. In the second hypothesis, we argue that firms need to balance network openness. Developing too low level of network openness will not add more benefits as the cost for maintaining relationship increases. Similarly, developing too high level of openness may potentially hinder firms{\textquoteright} progress as firms face distractions and difficulties in maintaining a wide variety of relationships. Using the empirical data from new technology-based firms located at the Daresbury SIC, we confirm the hypotheses. The result also found a trend of a curvilinear relationship between network openness and the firms{\textquoteright} performance which confirm the second hypothesis. The overall findings have illustrated how a network has a positive impact on helping small and new technology-based firms perform learning ambidexterity.",
author = "Danny Soetanto",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781785600333 ",
volume = "11",
pages = "227--245",
editor = "Aard Groen and Gary Cook and {Van Der Sijde}, Peter",
booktitle = "New technology-based firms in the new millennium",
publisher = "Emerald",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Network openness and learning ambidexterity of new technology-based firms at incubators

AU - Soetanto, Danny

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - For a new technology-based firm, the ability to learn is crucial to their growth process. However, firms constantly face the challenge of maintaining the ambidexterity of two different learning activities, namely learning by exploiting existing competencies and learning through exploring new ones. The purpose of this study is to examine how small technology-based firms at incubators perform both activities. Using the index of network openness, we argue that firms perform ambidexterity by maintaining a balance between a high and low level of network openness. Our first hypothesis was constructed as firms pursuing explorative learning will develop a high level of network openness while those pursuing exploitative learning will develop a low level of network openness. In the second hypothesis, we argue that firms need to balance network openness. Developing too low level of network openness will not add more benefits as the cost for maintaining relationship increases. Similarly, developing too high level of openness may potentially hinder firms’ progress as firms face distractions and difficulties in maintaining a wide variety of relationships. Using the empirical data from new technology-based firms located at the Daresbury SIC, we confirm the hypotheses. The result also found a trend of a curvilinear relationship between network openness and the firms’ performance which confirm the second hypothesis. The overall findings have illustrated how a network has a positive impact on helping small and new technology-based firms perform learning ambidexterity.

AB - For a new technology-based firm, the ability to learn is crucial to their growth process. However, firms constantly face the challenge of maintaining the ambidexterity of two different learning activities, namely learning by exploiting existing competencies and learning through exploring new ones. The purpose of this study is to examine how small technology-based firms at incubators perform both activities. Using the index of network openness, we argue that firms perform ambidexterity by maintaining a balance between a high and low level of network openness. Our first hypothesis was constructed as firms pursuing explorative learning will develop a high level of network openness while those pursuing exploitative learning will develop a low level of network openness. In the second hypothesis, we argue that firms need to balance network openness. Developing too low level of network openness will not add more benefits as the cost for maintaining relationship increases. Similarly, developing too high level of openness may potentially hinder firms’ progress as firms face distractions and difficulties in maintaining a wide variety of relationships. Using the empirical data from new technology-based firms located at the Daresbury SIC, we confirm the hypotheses. The result also found a trend of a curvilinear relationship between network openness and the firms’ performance which confirm the second hypothesis. The overall findings have illustrated how a network has a positive impact on helping small and new technology-based firms perform learning ambidexterity.

M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

SN - 9781785600333

VL - 11

SP - 227

EP - 245

BT - New technology-based firms in the new millennium

A2 - Groen, Aard

A2 - Cook, Gary

A2 - Van Der Sijde, Peter

PB - Emerald

ER -