Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Neural correlates of illusory line motion

Electronic data

  • journal.pone.0087595

    Rights statement: Copyright: © 2014 Hamm et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

    Final published version, 1.9 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Neural correlates of illusory line motion: fMRI of ILM

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Neural correlates of illusory line motion: fMRI of ILM. / Hamm, Jeff P.; Crawford, Trevor; Nebl , Helmut et al.
In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 9, No. 1, 27.01.2014, p. 1-11.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Hamm, JP, Crawford, T, Nebl , H, Kean, M, Williams , S & Ettinger, U 2014, 'Neural correlates of illusory line motion: fMRI of ILM', PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087595

APA

Hamm, J. P., Crawford, T., Nebl , H., Kean, M., Williams , S., & Ettinger, U. (2014). Neural correlates of illusory line motion: fMRI of ILM. PLoS ONE, 9(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087595

Vancouver

Hamm JP, Crawford T, Nebl H, Kean M, Williams S, Ettinger U. Neural correlates of illusory line motion: fMRI of ILM. PLoS ONE. 2014 Jan 27;9(1):1-11. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087595

Author

Hamm, Jeff P. ; Crawford, Trevor ; Nebl , Helmut et al. / Neural correlates of illusory line motion : fMRI of ILM. In: PLoS ONE. 2014 ; Vol. 9, No. 1. pp. 1-11.

Bibtex

@article{64b8ac7c34c94517bec47f05a49eca17,
title = "Neural correlates of illusory line motion: fMRI of ILM",
abstract = "Illusory line motion (ILM) refers to a motion illusion in which a flash at one end of a bar prior to the bar's instantaneous presentation or removal results in the percept of motion. While some theories attribute the origin of ILM to attention or early perceptual mechanisms, others have proposed that ILM results from impletion mechanisms that reinterpret the static bar as one in motion. The current functional magnetic resonance imaging study examined participants while they made decisions about the direction of motion in which a bar appeared to be removed. Preceding the instantaneous removal of the bar with a flash at one end resulted in a motion percept away from the flash. If this flash and the bar's removal overlapped in time, it appeared that the bar was removed towards the flash (reverse ILM). Independent of the motion type, brain responses indicated activations in areas associated with motion (MT+), endogenous and exogenous attention (intraparietal sulcus, frontal eye fields, and ventral frontal cortex), and response selection (ACC). ILM was associated with lower percept scores and higher activations in ACC relative to real motion, but no differences in shapeselective areas emerged. This pattern of brain activation is consistent with the attentional gradient model or bottom-up accounts of ILM in preference to impletion.",
keywords = "fMRI, attention networks, attentional gradient, illusory line motion, motion perception, Illusions, visual cortex, MT",
author = "Hamm, {Jeff P.} and Trevor Crawford and Helmut Nebl and Matt Kean and Steven Williams and Ulrich Ettinger",
note = "Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2014 Hamm et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.",
year = "2014",
month = jan,
day = "27",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0087595",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "1--11",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neural correlates of illusory line motion

T2 - fMRI of ILM

AU - Hamm, Jeff P.

AU - Crawford, Trevor

AU - Nebl , Helmut

AU - Kean, Matt

AU - Williams , Steven

AU - Ettinger, Ulrich

N1 - Copyright: © 2014 Hamm et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

PY - 2014/1/27

Y1 - 2014/1/27

N2 - Illusory line motion (ILM) refers to a motion illusion in which a flash at one end of a bar prior to the bar's instantaneous presentation or removal results in the percept of motion. While some theories attribute the origin of ILM to attention or early perceptual mechanisms, others have proposed that ILM results from impletion mechanisms that reinterpret the static bar as one in motion. The current functional magnetic resonance imaging study examined participants while they made decisions about the direction of motion in which a bar appeared to be removed. Preceding the instantaneous removal of the bar with a flash at one end resulted in a motion percept away from the flash. If this flash and the bar's removal overlapped in time, it appeared that the bar was removed towards the flash (reverse ILM). Independent of the motion type, brain responses indicated activations in areas associated with motion (MT+), endogenous and exogenous attention (intraparietal sulcus, frontal eye fields, and ventral frontal cortex), and response selection (ACC). ILM was associated with lower percept scores and higher activations in ACC relative to real motion, but no differences in shapeselective areas emerged. This pattern of brain activation is consistent with the attentional gradient model or bottom-up accounts of ILM in preference to impletion.

AB - Illusory line motion (ILM) refers to a motion illusion in which a flash at one end of a bar prior to the bar's instantaneous presentation or removal results in the percept of motion. While some theories attribute the origin of ILM to attention or early perceptual mechanisms, others have proposed that ILM results from impletion mechanisms that reinterpret the static bar as one in motion. The current functional magnetic resonance imaging study examined participants while they made decisions about the direction of motion in which a bar appeared to be removed. Preceding the instantaneous removal of the bar with a flash at one end resulted in a motion percept away from the flash. If this flash and the bar's removal overlapped in time, it appeared that the bar was removed towards the flash (reverse ILM). Independent of the motion type, brain responses indicated activations in areas associated with motion (MT+), endogenous and exogenous attention (intraparietal sulcus, frontal eye fields, and ventral frontal cortex), and response selection (ACC). ILM was associated with lower percept scores and higher activations in ACC relative to real motion, but no differences in shapeselective areas emerged. This pattern of brain activation is consistent with the attentional gradient model or bottom-up accounts of ILM in preference to impletion.

KW - fMRI

KW - attention networks

KW - attentional gradient

KW - illusory line motion

KW - motion perception

KW - Illusions

KW - visual cortex

KW - MT

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0087595

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0087595

M3 - Journal article

VL - 9

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 1

ER -