TY - JOUR

T1 - New insights into transformation mechanisms for sulfate and chlorine radical-mediated degradation of sulfonamide and fluoroquinolone antibiotics

AU - Zheng, Jinshuai

AU - Niu, Junfeng

AU - Halsall, Crispin

AU - Guo, Yadi

AU - Zhang, Peng

AU - Ge, Linke

PY - 2025/5/1

Y1 - 2025/5/1

N2 - As antibiotic pollutants cannot be incompletely removed by conventional wastewater treatment plants, ultraviolet (UV) based advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) such as UV/persulfate (UV/PS) and UV/chlorine are increasingly concerned for the effective removal of antibiotics from wastewaters. However, the specific mechanisms involving degradation kinetics and transformation mechanisms are not well elucidated. Here we report a detailed examination of SO4 •−/Cl•-mediated degradation kinetics, products, and toxicities of sulfathiazole (ST), sarafloxacin (SAR), and lomefloxacin (LOM) in the two processes. Both SO4 •−/Cl•-mediated transformation kinetics were found to be dependent on pH (P < 0.05), which was attributed to the disparate reactivities of their individual dissociated forms. Based on competition kinetic experiments and matrix calculations, the cationic forms (H2ST+, H2SAR+, and H2LOM+) were more highly reactive towards SO4 •− in most cases, while the neutral forms (e.g., HSAR0 and HLOM0) reacted the fastest with Cl• for the most of the antibiotics tested. Based on the identification of 31 key intermediates using tandem mass spectrometry, these reactions generated different products, of which the majority still retained the core chemical structure of the parent compounds. The corresponding diverse transformation pathways were proposed, involving S−N breaking, hydroxylation, defluorination, and chlorination reactions. Furthermore, the toxicity changes of their reaction solutions as well as the toxicity of each intermediate were evaluated by the vibrio fischeri and ECOSAR model, respectively. Many primary by-products were proven to be more toxic than the parent chemicals, raising the wider issue of extended potency for these compounds with regards to their ecotoxicity. These results have implications for assessing the degradative fate and risk of these chemicals during the AOPs.

AB - As antibiotic pollutants cannot be incompletely removed by conventional wastewater treatment plants, ultraviolet (UV) based advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) such as UV/persulfate (UV/PS) and UV/chlorine are increasingly concerned for the effective removal of antibiotics from wastewaters. However, the specific mechanisms involving degradation kinetics and transformation mechanisms are not well elucidated. Here we report a detailed examination of SO4 •−/Cl•-mediated degradation kinetics, products, and toxicities of sulfathiazole (ST), sarafloxacin (SAR), and lomefloxacin (LOM) in the two processes. Both SO4 •−/Cl•-mediated transformation kinetics were found to be dependent on pH (P < 0.05), which was attributed to the disparate reactivities of their individual dissociated forms. Based on competition kinetic experiments and matrix calculations, the cationic forms (H2ST+, H2SAR+, and H2LOM+) were more highly reactive towards SO4 •− in most cases, while the neutral forms (e.g., HSAR0 and HLOM0) reacted the fastest with Cl• for the most of the antibiotics tested. Based on the identification of 31 key intermediates using tandem mass spectrometry, these reactions generated different products, of which the majority still retained the core chemical structure of the parent compounds. The corresponding diverse transformation pathways were proposed, involving S−N breaking, hydroxylation, defluorination, and chlorination reactions. Furthermore, the toxicity changes of their reaction solutions as well as the toxicity of each intermediate were evaluated by the vibrio fischeri and ECOSAR model, respectively. Many primary by-products were proven to be more toxic than the parent chemicals, raising the wider issue of extended potency for these compounds with regards to their ecotoxicity. These results have implications for assessing the degradative fate and risk of these chemicals during the AOPs.

U2 - 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110202

DO - 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110202

M3 - Journal article

VL - 36

JO - Chinese Chemical Letters

JF - Chinese Chemical Letters

SN - 1001-8417

IS - 5

M1 - 110202

ER -