Accepted author manuscript, 139 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - New policy and regulatory reforms for Ontario Conservation Authorities
AU - Mitchell, Bruce
AU - Shrubsole, Dan
AU - Watson, Nigel
PY - 2024/6/27
Y1 - 2024/6/27
N2 - First established in the 1940s, Ontario Conservation Authorities are internationally recognized as leading examples of integrated water resources management. In late 2021 and early 2022, the Ontario government published two reports focused on regulatory proposals and rules of conduct for conservation authorities (CAs). A primary aim of the provincial government’s pro-growth proposals was to increase the supply of affordable housing by speeding up new development review and approval processes. The following topics were identified as mandatory programs for CAs related to risks posed by natural hazards within their jurisdiction: flooding, erosion, dynamic beaches, hazardous sites as defined by a Provincial policy statement in 2020, and low water/drought. The overall intent of the Ontario government proposals is for CAs to focus on identifying natural hazards, assessing and managing associated risks, and improving public awareness of hazards. In this commentary, we summarize key changes for the CAs proposed by the Ontario government, and identify implications for the future, including CAs having less autonomy and discretion over core mandatory programs, increased emphasis on local funding, and municipalities having more say in CA programs and services for which they pay.
AB - First established in the 1940s, Ontario Conservation Authorities are internationally recognized as leading examples of integrated water resources management. In late 2021 and early 2022, the Ontario government published two reports focused on regulatory proposals and rules of conduct for conservation authorities (CAs). A primary aim of the provincial government’s pro-growth proposals was to increase the supply of affordable housing by speeding up new development review and approval processes. The following topics were identified as mandatory programs for CAs related to risks posed by natural hazards within their jurisdiction: flooding, erosion, dynamic beaches, hazardous sites as defined by a Provincial policy statement in 2020, and low water/drought. The overall intent of the Ontario government proposals is for CAs to focus on identifying natural hazards, assessing and managing associated risks, and improving public awareness of hazards. In this commentary, we summarize key changes for the CAs proposed by the Ontario government, and identify implications for the future, including CAs having less autonomy and discretion over core mandatory programs, increased emphasis on local funding, and municipalities having more say in CA programs and services for which they pay.
U2 - 10.1080/07011784.2024.2370199
DO - 10.1080/07011784.2024.2370199
M3 - Journal article
SP - 1
EP - 7
JO - Canadian Water Resources Journal
JF - Canadian Water Resources Journal
SN - 0701-1784
ER -