Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Not all numbers are equal

Electronic data

  • Not_all_numbers

    Rights statement: Copyright © 2014 Towse, Loetscher and Brugger. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    Final published version, 681 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Not all numbers are equal: preferences and biases among children and adults when generating random sequences

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Not all numbers are equal: preferences and biases among children and adults when generating random sequences. / Towse, John; Loetscher, Tobias; Brugger, Peter.
In: Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 5, 19, 23.01.2014.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Towse J, Loetscher T, Brugger P. Not all numbers are equal: preferences and biases among children and adults when generating random sequences. Frontiers in Psychology. 2014 Jan 23;5:19. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00019

Author

Towse, John ; Loetscher, Tobias ; Brugger, Peter. / Not all numbers are equal : preferences and biases among children and adults when generating random sequences. In: Frontiers in Psychology. 2014 ; Vol. 5.

Bibtex

@article{69ecae99d7cf4b299863f5b84fffd2f9,
title = "Not all numbers are equal: preferences and biases among children and adults when generating random sequences",
abstract = "We investigate the number preferences of children and adults when generating random digit sequences. Previous research has shown convincingly that adults prefer smaller numbers when randomly choosing between responses 1-6. We analyse randomisation choices made by both children and adults, considering a range of experimental studies and task configurations. Children – most of whom are between 8 and 11 years- show a preference for relatively large numbers when choosing numbers 1-10. Adults show a preference for small numbers with the same response set. We report a modest association between children{\textquoteright}s age and numerical bias. However, children also exhibit a small number bias with a smaller response set available, and they show a preference specifically for the numbers 1-3 across many datasets. We argue that number space demonstrates both continuities (numbers 1-3 have a distinct status) and change (a developmentally emerging bias towards the left side of representational space or lower numbers).",
keywords = "Numerical cognition, spatial cognition, Random Generation, Cognitive development, Number preferences",
author = "John Towse and Tobias Loetscher and Peter Brugger",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2014 Towse, Loetscher and Brugger. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.",
year = "2014",
month = jan,
day = "23",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00019",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychology",
issn = "1664-1078",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S.A.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Not all numbers are equal

T2 - preferences and biases among children and adults when generating random sequences

AU - Towse, John

AU - Loetscher, Tobias

AU - Brugger, Peter

N1 - Copyright © 2014 Towse, Loetscher and Brugger. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

PY - 2014/1/23

Y1 - 2014/1/23

N2 - We investigate the number preferences of children and adults when generating random digit sequences. Previous research has shown convincingly that adults prefer smaller numbers when randomly choosing between responses 1-6. We analyse randomisation choices made by both children and adults, considering a range of experimental studies and task configurations. Children – most of whom are between 8 and 11 years- show a preference for relatively large numbers when choosing numbers 1-10. Adults show a preference for small numbers with the same response set. We report a modest association between children’s age and numerical bias. However, children also exhibit a small number bias with a smaller response set available, and they show a preference specifically for the numbers 1-3 across many datasets. We argue that number space demonstrates both continuities (numbers 1-3 have a distinct status) and change (a developmentally emerging bias towards the left side of representational space or lower numbers).

AB - We investigate the number preferences of children and adults when generating random digit sequences. Previous research has shown convincingly that adults prefer smaller numbers when randomly choosing between responses 1-6. We analyse randomisation choices made by both children and adults, considering a range of experimental studies and task configurations. Children – most of whom are between 8 and 11 years- show a preference for relatively large numbers when choosing numbers 1-10. Adults show a preference for small numbers with the same response set. We report a modest association between children’s age and numerical bias. However, children also exhibit a small number bias with a smaller response set available, and they show a preference specifically for the numbers 1-3 across many datasets. We argue that number space demonstrates both continuities (numbers 1-3 have a distinct status) and change (a developmentally emerging bias towards the left side of representational space or lower numbers).

KW - Numerical cognition

KW - spatial cognition

KW - Random Generation

KW - Cognitive development

KW - Number preferences

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00019

DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00019

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 24478747

VL - 5

JO - Frontiers in Psychology

JF - Frontiers in Psychology

SN - 1664-1078

M1 - 19

ER -