Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Not Notable Enough

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Not Notable Enough: Feminism and Expertise in Wikipedia

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Not Notable Enough: Feminism and Expertise in Wikipedia. / Gauthier, Maude; Sawchuk, Kim.
In: Communication and Critical Cultural Studies, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2017, p. 385-402.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Gauthier, M & Sawchuk, K 2017, 'Not Notable Enough: Feminism and Expertise in Wikipedia', Communication and Critical Cultural Studies, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 385-402. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2017.1386321

APA

Gauthier, M., & Sawchuk, K. (2017). Not Notable Enough: Feminism and Expertise in Wikipedia. Communication and Critical Cultural Studies, 14(4), 385-402. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2017.1386321

Vancouver

Gauthier M, Sawchuk K. Not Notable Enough: Feminism and Expertise in Wikipedia. Communication and Critical Cultural Studies. 2017;14(4):385-402. Epub 2017 Oct 25. doi: 10.1080/14791420.2017.1386321

Author

Gauthier, Maude ; Sawchuk, Kim. / Not Notable Enough : Feminism and Expertise in Wikipedia. In: Communication and Critical Cultural Studies. 2017 ; Vol. 14, No. 4. pp. 385-402.

Bibtex

@article{6f2b06d3969247139da75dcfd8191502,
title = "Not Notable Enough: Feminism and Expertise in Wikipedia",
abstract = "Wikipedia promotes itself as a community that anyone can join as long as they know the rules. In this paper, we reflect on our attempt to join this community and to edit Wikientries on ageing so that they include an intersectional perspective, especially with regard to gender. Our excursion into Wikipedia reveals how certain entries act as sites of contestation between different communities of practice, such as feminist scholars and Wikipedia experts. We document and discuss three interconnected discursive guidelines over which contestation takes place: notability, verifiability, and tone. These guidelines govern the way that Wikipedia operates in relationship to dominant discourses on age and gender. They are at the heart of its inequitable treatment of content matter.",
keywords = "Wikipedia, expertise, feminism, ageing, cultural studies",
author = "Maude Gauthier and Kim Sawchuk",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1080/14791420.2017.1386321",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "385--402",
journal = "Communication and Critical Cultural Studies",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Not Notable Enough

T2 - Feminism and Expertise in Wikipedia

AU - Gauthier, Maude

AU - Sawchuk, Kim

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Wikipedia promotes itself as a community that anyone can join as long as they know the rules. In this paper, we reflect on our attempt to join this community and to edit Wikientries on ageing so that they include an intersectional perspective, especially with regard to gender. Our excursion into Wikipedia reveals how certain entries act as sites of contestation between different communities of practice, such as feminist scholars and Wikipedia experts. We document and discuss three interconnected discursive guidelines over which contestation takes place: notability, verifiability, and tone. These guidelines govern the way that Wikipedia operates in relationship to dominant discourses on age and gender. They are at the heart of its inequitable treatment of content matter.

AB - Wikipedia promotes itself as a community that anyone can join as long as they know the rules. In this paper, we reflect on our attempt to join this community and to edit Wikientries on ageing so that they include an intersectional perspective, especially with regard to gender. Our excursion into Wikipedia reveals how certain entries act as sites of contestation between different communities of practice, such as feminist scholars and Wikipedia experts. We document and discuss three interconnected discursive guidelines over which contestation takes place: notability, verifiability, and tone. These guidelines govern the way that Wikipedia operates in relationship to dominant discourses on age and gender. They are at the heart of its inequitable treatment of content matter.

KW - Wikipedia

KW - expertise

KW - feminism

KW - ageing

KW - cultural studies

U2 - 10.1080/14791420.2017.1386321

DO - 10.1080/14791420.2017.1386321

M3 - Journal article

VL - 14

SP - 385

EP - 402

JO - Communication and Critical Cultural Studies

JF - Communication and Critical Cultural Studies

IS - 4

ER -