Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Numerical hydrodynamic modelling of a pitching ...

Associated organisational units

Electronic data

  • WraspaJournalMajidBhinder

    Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in European Journal of Computational Mechanics on 13/11/2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17797179.2015.1096228

    Accepted author manuscript, 1.31 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Numerical hydrodynamic modelling of a pitching wave energy converter

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Numerical hydrodynamic modelling of a pitching wave energy converter. / Bhinder, Majid A.; Rahmati, M. T.; Mingham, Clive G.; Aggidis, George Athanasios.

In: European Journal of Computational Mechanics, Vol. 24, No. 4, 2015, p. 129-143.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Bhinder, MA, Rahmati, MT, Mingham, CG & Aggidis, GA 2015, 'Numerical hydrodynamic modelling of a pitching wave energy converter', European Journal of Computational Mechanics, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 129-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/17797179.2015.1096228

APA

Bhinder, M. A., Rahmati, M. T., Mingham, C. G., & Aggidis, G. A. (2015). Numerical hydrodynamic modelling of a pitching wave energy converter. European Journal of Computational Mechanics, 24(4), 129-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/17797179.2015.1096228

Vancouver

Bhinder MA, Rahmati MT, Mingham CG, Aggidis GA. Numerical hydrodynamic modelling of a pitching wave energy converter. European Journal of Computational Mechanics. 2015;24(4):129-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/17797179.2015.1096228

Author

Bhinder, Majid A. ; Rahmati, M. T. ; Mingham, Clive G. ; Aggidis, George Athanasios. / Numerical hydrodynamic modelling of a pitching wave energy converter. In: European Journal of Computational Mechanics. 2015 ; Vol. 24, No. 4. pp. 129-143.

Bibtex

@article{9d6a7b84fb5f4da4a8c5c2f8311b257c,
title = "Numerical hydrodynamic modelling of a pitching wave energy converter",
abstract = "Two computational methodologies – computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and the numerical modelling using linear potential theory based boundary element method (BEM) are compared against experimental measurements of the motion response of a pitching wave energy converter. CFD is considered as relatively rigorous approach offering nonlinear incorporation of viscous and vortex phenomenon and capturing of the flow turbulence to some extent, whereas numerical approach of the BEM relies upon the linear frequency domain hydrodynamic calculations that can be further used for the time-domain analysis offering robust preliminary design analysis. This paper reports results fromboth approaches and concludes upon the comparison of numerical and experimental findings.",
author = "Bhinder, {Majid A.} and Rahmati, {M. T.} and Mingham, {Clive G.} and Aggidis, {George Athanasios}",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in European Journal of Computational Mechanics on 13/11/2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17797179.2015.1096228",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/17797179.2015.1096228",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "129--143",
journal = "European Journal of Computational Mechanics",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Numerical hydrodynamic modelling of a pitching wave energy converter

AU - Bhinder, Majid A.

AU - Rahmati, M. T.

AU - Mingham, Clive G.

AU - Aggidis, George Athanasios

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in European Journal of Computational Mechanics on 13/11/2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17797179.2015.1096228

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Two computational methodologies – computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and the numerical modelling using linear potential theory based boundary element method (BEM) are compared against experimental measurements of the motion response of a pitching wave energy converter. CFD is considered as relatively rigorous approach offering nonlinear incorporation of viscous and vortex phenomenon and capturing of the flow turbulence to some extent, whereas numerical approach of the BEM relies upon the linear frequency domain hydrodynamic calculations that can be further used for the time-domain analysis offering robust preliminary design analysis. This paper reports results fromboth approaches and concludes upon the comparison of numerical and experimental findings.

AB - Two computational methodologies – computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and the numerical modelling using linear potential theory based boundary element method (BEM) are compared against experimental measurements of the motion response of a pitching wave energy converter. CFD is considered as relatively rigorous approach offering nonlinear incorporation of viscous and vortex phenomenon and capturing of the flow turbulence to some extent, whereas numerical approach of the BEM relies upon the linear frequency domain hydrodynamic calculations that can be further used for the time-domain analysis offering robust preliminary design analysis. This paper reports results fromboth approaches and concludes upon the comparison of numerical and experimental findings.

U2 - 10.1080/17797179.2015.1096228

DO - 10.1080/17797179.2015.1096228

M3 - Journal article

VL - 24

SP - 129

EP - 143

JO - European Journal of Computational Mechanics

JF - European Journal of Computational Mechanics

IS - 4

ER -