Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Objective image fusion performance characterisa...
View graph of relations

Objective image fusion performance characterisation

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Published

Standard

Objective image fusion performance characterisation. / Petrovic, V.; Xydeas, C.
Computer Vision, 2005. ICCV 2005. Tenth IEEE International Conference on. Vol. 2 IEEE, 2005. p. 1866-1871 .

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Harvard

Petrovic, V & Xydeas, C 2005, Objective image fusion performance characterisation. in Computer Vision, 2005. ICCV 2005. Tenth IEEE International Conference on. vol. 2, IEEE, pp. 1866-1871 . https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2005.175

APA

Petrovic, V., & Xydeas, C. (2005). Objective image fusion performance characterisation. In Computer Vision, 2005. ICCV 2005. Tenth IEEE International Conference on (Vol. 2, pp. 1866-1871 ). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2005.175

Vancouver

Petrovic V, Xydeas C. Objective image fusion performance characterisation. In Computer Vision, 2005. ICCV 2005. Tenth IEEE International Conference on. Vol. 2. IEEE. 2005. p. 1866-1871 doi: 10.1109/ICCV.2005.175

Author

Petrovic, V. ; Xydeas, C. / Objective image fusion performance characterisation. Computer Vision, 2005. ICCV 2005. Tenth IEEE International Conference on. Vol. 2 IEEE, 2005. pp. 1866-1871

Bibtex

@inproceedings{6b0381eb669145f6a6e5a38a87e6dc38,
title = "Objective image fusion performance characterisation",
abstract = "mage fusion as a way of combining multiple image signals into a single fused image has in recent years been extensively researched for a variety of multisensor applications. Choosing an optimal fusion approach for each application from the plethora of algorithms available however, remains a largely open issue. A small number of metrics proposed so far provide only a rough, numerical estimate of fusion performance with limited understanding of the relative merits of different fusion schemes. This paper proposes a method for comprehensive, objective, image fusion performance characterisation using a fusion evaluation framework based on gradient information representation. The method provides an in-depth analysis of fusion performance by quantifying: information contributions by each sensor, fusion gain, fusion information loss and fusion artifacts (artificial information created). It is demonstrated on the evaluation of an extensive dataset of multisensor images fused with a wide range of established image fusion algorithms. The results demonstrate and quantify a number of well known issues concerning the performance of these schemes and provide a useful insight into a number of more subtle yet important fusion performance effects not immediately accessible to an observer.",
author = "V. Petrovic and C. Xydeas",
year = "2005",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1109/ICCV.2005.175",
language = "English",
isbn = "0-7695-2334-X",
volume = "2",
pages = "1866--1871 ",
booktitle = "Computer Vision, 2005. ICCV 2005. Tenth IEEE International Conference on",
publisher = "IEEE",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - Objective image fusion performance characterisation

AU - Petrovic, V.

AU - Xydeas, C.

PY - 2005/10/1

Y1 - 2005/10/1

N2 - mage fusion as a way of combining multiple image signals into a single fused image has in recent years been extensively researched for a variety of multisensor applications. Choosing an optimal fusion approach for each application from the plethora of algorithms available however, remains a largely open issue. A small number of metrics proposed so far provide only a rough, numerical estimate of fusion performance with limited understanding of the relative merits of different fusion schemes. This paper proposes a method for comprehensive, objective, image fusion performance characterisation using a fusion evaluation framework based on gradient information representation. The method provides an in-depth analysis of fusion performance by quantifying: information contributions by each sensor, fusion gain, fusion information loss and fusion artifacts (artificial information created). It is demonstrated on the evaluation of an extensive dataset of multisensor images fused with a wide range of established image fusion algorithms. The results demonstrate and quantify a number of well known issues concerning the performance of these schemes and provide a useful insight into a number of more subtle yet important fusion performance effects not immediately accessible to an observer.

AB - mage fusion as a way of combining multiple image signals into a single fused image has in recent years been extensively researched for a variety of multisensor applications. Choosing an optimal fusion approach for each application from the plethora of algorithms available however, remains a largely open issue. A small number of metrics proposed so far provide only a rough, numerical estimate of fusion performance with limited understanding of the relative merits of different fusion schemes. This paper proposes a method for comprehensive, objective, image fusion performance characterisation using a fusion evaluation framework based on gradient information representation. The method provides an in-depth analysis of fusion performance by quantifying: information contributions by each sensor, fusion gain, fusion information loss and fusion artifacts (artificial information created). It is demonstrated on the evaluation of an extensive dataset of multisensor images fused with a wide range of established image fusion algorithms. The results demonstrate and quantify a number of well known issues concerning the performance of these schemes and provide a useful insight into a number of more subtle yet important fusion performance effects not immediately accessible to an observer.

U2 - 10.1109/ICCV.2005.175

DO - 10.1109/ICCV.2005.175

M3 - Conference contribution/Paper

SN - 0-7695-2334-X

VL - 2

SP - 1866

EP - 1871

BT - Computer Vision, 2005. ICCV 2005. Tenth IEEE International Conference on

PB - IEEE

ER -