Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Older age of onset in child L2 acquisition can ...

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Older age of onset in child L2 acquisition can be facilitative: Evidence from the acquisition of English passives by Spanish natives

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Older age of onset in child L2 acquisition can be facilitative: Evidence from the acquisition of English passives by Spanish natives. / Rothman, Jason; Long, Drew; Iverson, Michael et al.
In: Journal of Child Language, Vol. 43, No. 3, 01.05.2016, p. 662-686.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Rothman, J, Long, D, Iverson, M, Judy, T, Lingwall, A & Chakravarty, T 2016, 'Older age of onset in child L2 acquisition can be facilitative: Evidence from the acquisition of English passives by Spanish natives', Journal of Child Language, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 662-686. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000915000549

APA

Vancouver

Rothman J, Long D, Iverson M, Judy T, Lingwall A, Chakravarty T. Older age of onset in child L2 acquisition can be facilitative: Evidence from the acquisition of English passives by Spanish natives. Journal of Child Language. 2016 May 1;43(3):662-686. doi: 10.1017/S0305000915000549

Author

Rothman, Jason ; Long, Drew ; Iverson, Michael et al. / Older age of onset in child L2 acquisition can be facilitative : Evidence from the acquisition of English passives by Spanish natives. In: Journal of Child Language. 2016 ; Vol. 43, No. 3. pp. 662-686.

Bibtex

@article{85838eae74f04a66a028be17ae451401,
title = "Older age of onset in child L2 acquisition can be facilitative: Evidence from the acquisition of English passives by Spanish natives",
abstract = "We report a longitudinal comprehension study of (long) passive constructions in two native-Spanish child groups differing by age of initial exposure to L2 English (young group: 3;0-4;0; older group: 6;0-7;0), where amount of input, L2 exposure environment, and socioeconomic status are controlled. Data from a forced-choice task show that both groups comprehend active sentences, not passives, initially (after 3·6 years of exposure). One year later, both groups improve, but only the older group reaches ceiling on both actives and passives. Two years from initial testing, the younger group catches up. Input alone cannot explain why the younger group takes five years to accomplish what the older group does in four. We claim that some properties take longer to acquire at certain ages because language development is partially constrained by general cognitive and linguistic development (e.g. de Villiers, 2007; Long & Rothman, 2014; Paradis, 2008, 2010, 2011; Tsimpli, 2014).",
author = "Jason Rothman and Drew Long and Michael Iverson and Tiffany Judy and Anne Lingwall and Tushar Chakravarty",
year = "2016",
month = may,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S0305000915000549",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "662--686",
journal = "Journal of Child Language",
issn = "0305-0009",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Older age of onset in child L2 acquisition can be facilitative

T2 - Evidence from the acquisition of English passives by Spanish natives

AU - Rothman, Jason

AU - Long, Drew

AU - Iverson, Michael

AU - Judy, Tiffany

AU - Lingwall, Anne

AU - Chakravarty, Tushar

PY - 2016/5/1

Y1 - 2016/5/1

N2 - We report a longitudinal comprehension study of (long) passive constructions in two native-Spanish child groups differing by age of initial exposure to L2 English (young group: 3;0-4;0; older group: 6;0-7;0), where amount of input, L2 exposure environment, and socioeconomic status are controlled. Data from a forced-choice task show that both groups comprehend active sentences, not passives, initially (after 3·6 years of exposure). One year later, both groups improve, but only the older group reaches ceiling on both actives and passives. Two years from initial testing, the younger group catches up. Input alone cannot explain why the younger group takes five years to accomplish what the older group does in four. We claim that some properties take longer to acquire at certain ages because language development is partially constrained by general cognitive and linguistic development (e.g. de Villiers, 2007; Long & Rothman, 2014; Paradis, 2008, 2010, 2011; Tsimpli, 2014).

AB - We report a longitudinal comprehension study of (long) passive constructions in two native-Spanish child groups differing by age of initial exposure to L2 English (young group: 3;0-4;0; older group: 6;0-7;0), where amount of input, L2 exposure environment, and socioeconomic status are controlled. Data from a forced-choice task show that both groups comprehend active sentences, not passives, initially (after 3·6 years of exposure). One year later, both groups improve, but only the older group reaches ceiling on both actives and passives. Two years from initial testing, the younger group catches up. Input alone cannot explain why the younger group takes five years to accomplish what the older group does in four. We claim that some properties take longer to acquire at certain ages because language development is partially constrained by general cognitive and linguistic development (e.g. de Villiers, 2007; Long & Rothman, 2014; Paradis, 2008, 2010, 2011; Tsimpli, 2014).

U2 - 10.1017/S0305000915000549

DO - 10.1017/S0305000915000549

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 26915415

AN - SCOPUS:84959192860

VL - 43

SP - 662

EP - 686

JO - Journal of Child Language

JF - Journal of Child Language

SN - 0305-0009

IS - 3

ER -