Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Older people and oral health

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Older people and oral health: setting a patient-centred research agenda

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Older people and oral health: setting a patient-centred research agenda. / Brocklehurst, Paul R; Mackay, Laura; Goldthorpe, Joanna et al.
In: Gerodontology, Vol. 32, No. 3, 18.08.2015, p. 222-228.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Brocklehurst PR, Mackay L, Goldthorpe J, Pretty I. Older people and oral health: setting a patient-centred research agenda. Gerodontology. 2015 Aug 18;32(3):222-228. doi: 10.1111/ger.12199

Author

Brocklehurst, Paul R ; Mackay, Laura ; Goldthorpe, Joanna et al. / Older people and oral health : setting a patient-centred research agenda. In: Gerodontology. 2015 ; Vol. 32, No. 3. pp. 222-228.

Bibtex

@article{2f47b03a066b472a860e0a3f0f02fd3a,
title = "Older people and oral health: setting a patient-centred research agenda",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: The aim of this pilot study was to provide the opportunity to enable older people to prioritise the research agenda to improve their own oral health. BACKGROUND: Little is known about the ageing population's views about their oral health from their perspective. Priority Setting Partnerships (PSPs) incorporate users' perspectives to prioritise research agendas and are based on a series of sequential steps to build consensus. This structured approach ensures their narrative and thoughts are heard and helps counter the 'top-down' medical model that can dominate healthcare services. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A PSP was undertaken with four key stakeholder groups: service users, carers, third sector and specialists. Six initial questions were posed to each group prior to a facilitated discussion led by one of the research team. Collective responses where then considered by a final consensus group. The views of the different groups were recorded, transcribed verbatim and underwent thematic analysis. RESULTS: The top three research priorities identified by the final group were to: (i) identify 'best practice' in the prevention and treatment of oral diseases for older people, (ii) identify the training needs for the dental profession and (iii) understand the key issues for older people from their perspective. Improving access to services, the importance of client appropriate information and the need for effective primary and secondary prevention were also articulated. CONCLUSION: Asking older people to prioritise the research agenda proved to be a positive experience. Key issues related to improving communication and the availability of appropriate evidence-based information on primary, secondary and tertiary prevention.",
author = "Brocklehurst, {Paul R} and Laura Mackay and Joanna Goldthorpe and Iain Pretty",
year = "2015",
month = aug,
day = "18",
doi = "10.1111/ger.12199",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "222--228",
journal = "Gerodontology",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Older people and oral health

T2 - setting a patient-centred research agenda

AU - Brocklehurst, Paul R

AU - Mackay, Laura

AU - Goldthorpe, Joanna

AU - Pretty, Iain

PY - 2015/8/18

Y1 - 2015/8/18

N2 - OBJECTIVE: The aim of this pilot study was to provide the opportunity to enable older people to prioritise the research agenda to improve their own oral health. BACKGROUND: Little is known about the ageing population's views about their oral health from their perspective. Priority Setting Partnerships (PSPs) incorporate users' perspectives to prioritise research agendas and are based on a series of sequential steps to build consensus. This structured approach ensures their narrative and thoughts are heard and helps counter the 'top-down' medical model that can dominate healthcare services. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A PSP was undertaken with four key stakeholder groups: service users, carers, third sector and specialists. Six initial questions were posed to each group prior to a facilitated discussion led by one of the research team. Collective responses where then considered by a final consensus group. The views of the different groups were recorded, transcribed verbatim and underwent thematic analysis. RESULTS: The top three research priorities identified by the final group were to: (i) identify 'best practice' in the prevention and treatment of oral diseases for older people, (ii) identify the training needs for the dental profession and (iii) understand the key issues for older people from their perspective. Improving access to services, the importance of client appropriate information and the need for effective primary and secondary prevention were also articulated. CONCLUSION: Asking older people to prioritise the research agenda proved to be a positive experience. Key issues related to improving communication and the availability of appropriate evidence-based information on primary, secondary and tertiary prevention.

AB - OBJECTIVE: The aim of this pilot study was to provide the opportunity to enable older people to prioritise the research agenda to improve their own oral health. BACKGROUND: Little is known about the ageing population's views about their oral health from their perspective. Priority Setting Partnerships (PSPs) incorporate users' perspectives to prioritise research agendas and are based on a series of sequential steps to build consensus. This structured approach ensures their narrative and thoughts are heard and helps counter the 'top-down' medical model that can dominate healthcare services. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A PSP was undertaken with four key stakeholder groups: service users, carers, third sector and specialists. Six initial questions were posed to each group prior to a facilitated discussion led by one of the research team. Collective responses where then considered by a final consensus group. The views of the different groups were recorded, transcribed verbatim and underwent thematic analysis. RESULTS: The top three research priorities identified by the final group were to: (i) identify 'best practice' in the prevention and treatment of oral diseases for older people, (ii) identify the training needs for the dental profession and (iii) understand the key issues for older people from their perspective. Improving access to services, the importance of client appropriate information and the need for effective primary and secondary prevention were also articulated. CONCLUSION: Asking older people to prioritise the research agenda proved to be a positive experience. Key issues related to improving communication and the availability of appropriate evidence-based information on primary, secondary and tertiary prevention.

U2 - 10.1111/ger.12199

DO - 10.1111/ger.12199

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 26009973

VL - 32

SP - 222

EP - 228

JO - Gerodontology

JF - Gerodontology

IS - 3

ER -