Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > On cognition and action in organisational life:...

Electronic data

View graph of relations

On cognition and action in organisational life: management and the situated body in-the-world

Research output: Working paper

Published

Standard

On cognition and action in organisational life: management and the situated body in-the-world. / Costea, B; Introna, L.
Lancaster University: The Department of Organisation, Work and Technology, 2004. (Organisation, Work and Technology Working Paper Series).

Research output: Working paper

Harvard

Costea, B & Introna, L 2004 'On cognition and action in organisational life: management and the situated body in-the-world' Organisation, Work and Technology Working Paper Series, The Department of Organisation, Work and Technology, Lancaster University.

APA

Costea, B., & Introna, L. (2004). On cognition and action in organisational life: management and the situated body in-the-world. (Organisation, Work and Technology Working Paper Series). The Department of Organisation, Work and Technology.

Vancouver

Costea B, Introna L. On cognition and action in organisational life: management and the situated body in-the-world. Lancaster University: The Department of Organisation, Work and Technology. 2004. (Organisation, Work and Technology Working Paper Series).

Author

Costea, B ; Introna, L. / On cognition and action in organisational life: management and the situated body in-the-world. Lancaster University : The Department of Organisation, Work and Technology, 2004. (Organisation, Work and Technology Working Paper Series).

Bibtex

@techreport{3bda82e95c034a2189561c47ddc85e8c,
title = "On cognition and action in organisational life: management and the situated body in-the-world",
abstract = "This paper is an attempt to question one of the most fundamental assumptions in management theory: thought as an activity separate from ongoing action in the world. The practical manifestation of this assumption in organisational life is vast; examples vary from the exotic such as strategic planning 'think tanks' and expert systems to the mundane such as policy and procedure documents and minutes of meetings. The paper argues, using the work of existential phenomenologists such as Bergson, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, Henry and others, that thought is nothing other than my always already embodied and situated doing and talking in the world. It argues that thought can not be disembodied and then re-embodied in the way assumed by, for example, the strategic management literature. The modest aim of the paper is to generate reasonable doubt about that which we have taken as self-evident in everyday life and in management discourse and practice: namely, that we-and likewise organisations-think before, while or after we act as a separate and distinct activity from action itself.",
author = "B Costea and L Introna",
year = "2004",
language = "English",
series = "Organisation, Work and Technology Working Paper Series",
publisher = "The Department of Organisation, Work and Technology",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "The Department of Organisation, Work and Technology",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - On cognition and action in organisational life: management and the situated body in-the-world

AU - Costea, B

AU - Introna, L

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - This paper is an attempt to question one of the most fundamental assumptions in management theory: thought as an activity separate from ongoing action in the world. The practical manifestation of this assumption in organisational life is vast; examples vary from the exotic such as strategic planning 'think tanks' and expert systems to the mundane such as policy and procedure documents and minutes of meetings. The paper argues, using the work of existential phenomenologists such as Bergson, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, Henry and others, that thought is nothing other than my always already embodied and situated doing and talking in the world. It argues that thought can not be disembodied and then re-embodied in the way assumed by, for example, the strategic management literature. The modest aim of the paper is to generate reasonable doubt about that which we have taken as self-evident in everyday life and in management discourse and practice: namely, that we-and likewise organisations-think before, while or after we act as a separate and distinct activity from action itself.

AB - This paper is an attempt to question one of the most fundamental assumptions in management theory: thought as an activity separate from ongoing action in the world. The practical manifestation of this assumption in organisational life is vast; examples vary from the exotic such as strategic planning 'think tanks' and expert systems to the mundane such as policy and procedure documents and minutes of meetings. The paper argues, using the work of existential phenomenologists such as Bergson, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, Henry and others, that thought is nothing other than my always already embodied and situated doing and talking in the world. It argues that thought can not be disembodied and then re-embodied in the way assumed by, for example, the strategic management literature. The modest aim of the paper is to generate reasonable doubt about that which we have taken as self-evident in everyday life and in management discourse and practice: namely, that we-and likewise organisations-think before, while or after we act as a separate and distinct activity from action itself.

M3 - Working paper

T3 - Organisation, Work and Technology Working Paper Series

BT - On cognition and action in organisational life: management and the situated body in-the-world

PB - The Department of Organisation, Work and Technology

CY - Lancaster University

ER -