Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > On cognition and action in organisational life:...
View graph of relations

On cognition and action in organisational life: management and the situated body in-the-world

Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN Speech

Published

Standard

On cognition and action in organisational life: management and the situated body in-the-world. / Introna, Lucas; Costea, Bogdan.
2004. EIASM, Paris.

Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN Speech

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@conference{9ab05e9cc894443ea6bc7ce77a3d952a,
title = "On cognition and action in organisational life: management and the situated body in-the-world",
abstract = "This paper is an attempt to question one of the most fundamental assumptions in management theory: thought as an activity separate from ongoing action in the world. The practical manifestation of this assumption in organisational life is vast; examples vary from the exotic such as strategic planning {\textquoteleft}think tanks{\textquoteright} and expert systems to the mundane such as policy and procedure documents and minutes of meetings. The paper argues, using the work of existential phenomenologists such as Bergson, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, Henry and others, that thought is nothing other than my always already embodied and situated doing and talking in the world. It argues that thought can not be disembodied and then re-embodied in the way assumed by, for example, the strategic management literature. The modest aim of the paper is to generate reasonable doubt about that which we have taken as self-evident in everyday life and in management discourse and practice: namely, that we—and likewise organisations—think before, while or after we act as a separate and distinct activity from action itself.",
author = "Lucas Introna and Bogdan Costea",
year = "2004",
language = "English",
note = "EIASM ; Conference date: 01-01-2004",

}

RIS

TY - CONF

T1 - On cognition and action in organisational life: management and the situated body in-the-world

AU - Introna, Lucas

AU - Costea, Bogdan

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - This paper is an attempt to question one of the most fundamental assumptions in management theory: thought as an activity separate from ongoing action in the world. The practical manifestation of this assumption in organisational life is vast; examples vary from the exotic such as strategic planning ‘think tanks’ and expert systems to the mundane such as policy and procedure documents and minutes of meetings. The paper argues, using the work of existential phenomenologists such as Bergson, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, Henry and others, that thought is nothing other than my always already embodied and situated doing and talking in the world. It argues that thought can not be disembodied and then re-embodied in the way assumed by, for example, the strategic management literature. The modest aim of the paper is to generate reasonable doubt about that which we have taken as self-evident in everyday life and in management discourse and practice: namely, that we—and likewise organisations—think before, while or after we act as a separate and distinct activity from action itself.

AB - This paper is an attempt to question one of the most fundamental assumptions in management theory: thought as an activity separate from ongoing action in the world. The practical manifestation of this assumption in organisational life is vast; examples vary from the exotic such as strategic planning ‘think tanks’ and expert systems to the mundane such as policy and procedure documents and minutes of meetings. The paper argues, using the work of existential phenomenologists such as Bergson, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, Henry and others, that thought is nothing other than my always already embodied and situated doing and talking in the world. It argues that thought can not be disembodied and then re-embodied in the way assumed by, for example, the strategic management literature. The modest aim of the paper is to generate reasonable doubt about that which we have taken as self-evident in everyday life and in management discourse and practice: namely, that we—and likewise organisations—think before, while or after we act as a separate and distinct activity from action itself.

M3 - Speech

T2 - EIASM

Y2 - 1 January 2004

ER -