Rights statement: © Bronislaw Szerszynski, 2021. The definitive, peer reviewed and edited version of this article is published in Global Discourse, ?, ?, ?-?, 2021, 10.1332/204378921X16097452422318
Accepted author manuscript, 150 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - On representation and speculation
T2 - A case for the use of representational practices in SciArt
AU - Szerszynski, Bronislaw
N1 - © Bronislaw Szerszynski, 2021. The definitive, peer reviewed and edited version of this article is published in Global Discourse, ?, ?, ?-?, 2021, 10.1332/204378921X16097452422318
PY - 2021/1/28
Y1 - 2021/1/28
N2 - In a reply to ‘Speculative listening’ by Kaya Barry, Michele Lobo and Michelle Duffy, I make a defence of representation as a resource for experimental and speculative practice, arguing that the loss of total immersion in the flux and becoming of the world that the representational engenders is a precondition for experimentation and speculation.
AB - In a reply to ‘Speculative listening’ by Kaya Barry, Michele Lobo and Michelle Duffy, I make a defence of representation as a resource for experimental and speculative practice, arguing that the loss of total immersion in the flux and becoming of the world that the representational engenders is a precondition for experimentation and speculation.
KW - representation
KW - semiotics
KW - speculation
KW - experimentation
U2 - 10.1332/204378921X16097452422318
DO - 10.1332/204378921X16097452422318
M3 - Journal article
JO - Global Discourse
JF - Global Discourse
SN - 2326-9995
ER -