Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > On the origin of linguistic norms : orthography...

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

On the origin of linguistic norms : orthography, ideology and the constitutional challenge to the 1996 reform of German.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

On the origin of linguistic norms : orthography, ideology and the constitutional challenge to the 1996 reform of German. / Johnson, Sally.
In: Language in Society, Vol. 31, No. 4, 10.2002, p. 549-576.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Johnson S. On the origin of linguistic norms : orthography, ideology and the constitutional challenge to the 1996 reform of German. Language in Society. 2002 Oct;31(4):549-576. doi: 10.1017/S0047404502314039

Author

Bibtex

@article{efdfefd3e7ba4e7cbfbc6c27c4f1a279,
title = "On the origin of linguistic norms : orthography, ideology and the constitutional challenge to the 1996 reform of German.",
abstract = "This article explores one aspect of the many public protests surrounding the 1996 reform of German orthography: the first in a series of LEGAL challenges, which was brought before the Federal Constitutional Court in May 1996. The first section begins by proposing how and why such protests can be usefully theorized in terms of Blommaert's (1999) concept of a “language ideological debate,” and then describes the historical background essential for an understanding of this legal dispute. The second section focuses on a critical analysis of the case brought against the reform, looking at the details of the challenge itself, together with the justification for its rejection by the Constitutional Court. The third section considers what this dispute can tell us about debates over the perceived origin of orthographic norms, with particular reference to the ideological relationship between individual, speech community, and (nation-)state. Finally, there is a brief summary of the way in which the matter was finally – albeit unsatisfactorily – resolved in 1998–1999.",
keywords = "Orthography, spelling reform, language ideological debates, standardization, linguistic norms, German language, late modernity.",
author = "Sally Johnson",
note = "http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=LSY The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Language in Society, 31 (4), pp 549-576 2002, {\textcopyright} 2002 Cambridge University Press.",
year = "2002",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1017/S0047404502314039",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "549--576",
journal = "Language in Society",
issn = "0047-4045",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the origin of linguistic norms : orthography, ideology and the constitutional challenge to the 1996 reform of German.

AU - Johnson, Sally

N1 - http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=LSY The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Language in Society, 31 (4), pp 549-576 2002, © 2002 Cambridge University Press.

PY - 2002/10

Y1 - 2002/10

N2 - This article explores one aspect of the many public protests surrounding the 1996 reform of German orthography: the first in a series of LEGAL challenges, which was brought before the Federal Constitutional Court in May 1996. The first section begins by proposing how and why such protests can be usefully theorized in terms of Blommaert's (1999) concept of a “language ideological debate,” and then describes the historical background essential for an understanding of this legal dispute. The second section focuses on a critical analysis of the case brought against the reform, looking at the details of the challenge itself, together with the justification for its rejection by the Constitutional Court. The third section considers what this dispute can tell us about debates over the perceived origin of orthographic norms, with particular reference to the ideological relationship between individual, speech community, and (nation-)state. Finally, there is a brief summary of the way in which the matter was finally – albeit unsatisfactorily – resolved in 1998–1999.

AB - This article explores one aspect of the many public protests surrounding the 1996 reform of German orthography: the first in a series of LEGAL challenges, which was brought before the Federal Constitutional Court in May 1996. The first section begins by proposing how and why such protests can be usefully theorized in terms of Blommaert's (1999) concept of a “language ideological debate,” and then describes the historical background essential for an understanding of this legal dispute. The second section focuses on a critical analysis of the case brought against the reform, looking at the details of the challenge itself, together with the justification for its rejection by the Constitutional Court. The third section considers what this dispute can tell us about debates over the perceived origin of orthographic norms, with particular reference to the ideological relationship between individual, speech community, and (nation-)state. Finally, there is a brief summary of the way in which the matter was finally – albeit unsatisfactorily – resolved in 1998–1999.

KW - Orthography

KW - spelling reform

KW - language ideological debates

KW - standardization

KW - linguistic norms

KW - German language

KW - late modernity.

U2 - 10.1017/S0047404502314039

DO - 10.1017/S0047404502314039

M3 - Journal article

VL - 31

SP - 549

EP - 576

JO - Language in Society

JF - Language in Society

SN - 0047-4045

IS - 4

ER -