Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > On the phantom-like appearance of bilingualism ...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

On the phantom-like appearance of bilingualism effects on neurocognition: (How) should we proceed?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

On the phantom-like appearance of bilingualism effects on neurocognition: (How) should we proceed? / Leivada, Evelina; Westergaard, Marit; Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni et al.
In: Bilingualism, Vol. 24, No. 1, 31.01.2021, p. 197-210.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Leivada E, Westergaard M, Duñabeitia JA, Rothman J. On the phantom-like appearance of bilingualism effects on neurocognition: (How) should we proceed? Bilingualism. 2021 Jan 31;24(1):197-210. Epub 2020 May 22. doi: 10.1017/S1366728920000358

Author

Leivada, Evelina ; Westergaard, Marit ; Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni et al. / On the phantom-like appearance of bilingualism effects on neurocognition : (How) should we proceed?. In: Bilingualism. 2021 ; Vol. 24, No. 1. pp. 197-210.

Bibtex

@article{8ba8660e7dfd4b48b19779fdc4aaf212,
title = "On the phantom-like appearance of bilingualism effects on neurocognition: (How) should we proceed?",
abstract = "Numerous studies have argued that bilingualism has effects on cognitive functions. Recently, in light of increasingly mixed empirical results, this claim has been challenged. One might ponder if there is enough evidence to justify a cessation to future research on the topic or, alternatively, how the field could proceed to better understand the phantom-like appearance of bilingual effects. Herein, we attempt to frame this appearance at the crossroads of several factors such as the heterogeneity of the term 'bilingual', sample size effects, task effects, and the complex dynamics between an early publication bias that favours positive results and the subsequent Proteus phenomenon. We conclude that any definitive claim on the topic is premature and that research must continue, albeit in a modified way. To this effect, we offer a path forward for future multi-lab work that should provide clearer answers to whether bilingualism has neurocognitive effects, and if so, under what conditions.",
keywords = "executive functions, Key words bilingualism, neurocognition, Proteus phenomenon",
author = "Evelina Leivada and Marit Westergaard and Du{\~n}abeitia, {Jon Andoni} and Jason Rothman",
note = "Publisher Copyright: Copyright {\textcopyright} The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press.",
year = "2021",
month = jan,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1017/S1366728920000358",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "197--210",
journal = "Bilingualism",
issn = "1366-7289",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the phantom-like appearance of bilingualism effects on neurocognition

T2 - (How) should we proceed?

AU - Leivada, Evelina

AU - Westergaard, Marit

AU - Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni

AU - Rothman, Jason

N1 - Publisher Copyright: Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press.

PY - 2021/1/31

Y1 - 2021/1/31

N2 - Numerous studies have argued that bilingualism has effects on cognitive functions. Recently, in light of increasingly mixed empirical results, this claim has been challenged. One might ponder if there is enough evidence to justify a cessation to future research on the topic or, alternatively, how the field could proceed to better understand the phantom-like appearance of bilingual effects. Herein, we attempt to frame this appearance at the crossroads of several factors such as the heterogeneity of the term 'bilingual', sample size effects, task effects, and the complex dynamics between an early publication bias that favours positive results and the subsequent Proteus phenomenon. We conclude that any definitive claim on the topic is premature and that research must continue, albeit in a modified way. To this effect, we offer a path forward for future multi-lab work that should provide clearer answers to whether bilingualism has neurocognitive effects, and if so, under what conditions.

AB - Numerous studies have argued that bilingualism has effects on cognitive functions. Recently, in light of increasingly mixed empirical results, this claim has been challenged. One might ponder if there is enough evidence to justify a cessation to future research on the topic or, alternatively, how the field could proceed to better understand the phantom-like appearance of bilingual effects. Herein, we attempt to frame this appearance at the crossroads of several factors such as the heterogeneity of the term 'bilingual', sample size effects, task effects, and the complex dynamics between an early publication bias that favours positive results and the subsequent Proteus phenomenon. We conclude that any definitive claim on the topic is premature and that research must continue, albeit in a modified way. To this effect, we offer a path forward for future multi-lab work that should provide clearer answers to whether bilingualism has neurocognitive effects, and if so, under what conditions.

KW - executive functions

KW - Key words bilingualism

KW - neurocognition

KW - Proteus phenomenon

U2 - 10.1017/S1366728920000358

DO - 10.1017/S1366728920000358

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85085689865

VL - 24

SP - 197

EP - 210

JO - Bilingualism

JF - Bilingualism

SN - 1366-7289

IS - 1

ER -