Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > On the Predictions of Cumulative Prospect Theor...

Electronic data

View graph of relations

On the Predictions of Cumulative Prospect Theory for Third and Fourth Order Preferences

Research output: Working paper

Published

Standard

On the Predictions of Cumulative Prospect Theory for Third and Fourth Order Preferences. / Paya, Ivan; Peel, David; Georgalos, Konstantinos.
Lancaster: Lancaster University, Department of Economics, 2020. (Economics Working Papers Series).

Research output: Working paper

Harvard

Paya, I, Peel, D & Georgalos, K 2020 'On the Predictions of Cumulative Prospect Theory for Third and Fourth Order Preferences' Economics Working Papers Series, Lancaster University, Department of Economics, Lancaster.

APA

Paya, I., Peel, D., & Georgalos, K. (2020). On the Predictions of Cumulative Prospect Theory for Third and Fourth Order Preferences. (Economics Working Papers Series). Lancaster University, Department of Economics.

Vancouver

Paya I, Peel D, Georgalos K. On the Predictions of Cumulative Prospect Theory for Third and Fourth Order Preferences. Lancaster: Lancaster University, Department of Economics. 2020 Apr 3. (Economics Working Papers Series).

Author

Paya, Ivan ; Peel, David ; Georgalos, Konstantinos. / On the Predictions of Cumulative Prospect Theory for Third and Fourth Order Preferences. Lancaster : Lancaster University, Department of Economics, 2020. (Economics Working Papers Series).

Bibtex

@techreport{cbceb4033b784b1fa5d23fdb1cfae290,
title = "On the Predictions of Cumulative Prospect Theory for Third and Fourth Order Preferences",
abstract = "This is the first paper to provide a comprehensive theoretical analysis of the third and fourth order lottery preferences implied by cumulative prospect theory (CPT). We consider the lottery choices from three alternative reference points: the status quo, the expected payout and the MaxMin. We report a large number of new results given the standard assumptions about probability weighting. We demonstrate, for example, the general result that from the status quo reference point there is no third order reflection effect but there is a fourth order reflectioneffect. When the average payout or the MaxMin is the reference point, we lose generality but can demonstrate that representative individuals with power value functions can make prudent or imprudent, temperate or intemperate choices depending on the precise magnitude of lottery payoffs. In addition to this, we show that these representative CPT individuals can exhibit some surprising combinations of second with third and fourth order risk attitudes. Throughout the paper, we contrast our theoretical predictions with results reported in the literature and we are able to reconcile some conflicting evidence on higher order risk preferences.",
keywords = "cumulative prospect theory, decision making under risk, experiments, higher order preferences, reflection effect",
author = "Ivan Paya and David Peel and Konstantinos Georgalos",
year = "2020",
month = apr,
day = "3",
language = "English",
series = "Economics Working Papers Series",
publisher = "Lancaster University, Department of Economics",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Lancaster University, Department of Economics",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - On the Predictions of Cumulative Prospect Theory for Third and Fourth Order Preferences

AU - Paya, Ivan

AU - Peel, David

AU - Georgalos, Konstantinos

PY - 2020/4/3

Y1 - 2020/4/3

N2 - This is the first paper to provide a comprehensive theoretical analysis of the third and fourth order lottery preferences implied by cumulative prospect theory (CPT). We consider the lottery choices from three alternative reference points: the status quo, the expected payout and the MaxMin. We report a large number of new results given the standard assumptions about probability weighting. We demonstrate, for example, the general result that from the status quo reference point there is no third order reflection effect but there is a fourth order reflectioneffect. When the average payout or the MaxMin is the reference point, we lose generality but can demonstrate that representative individuals with power value functions can make prudent or imprudent, temperate or intemperate choices depending on the precise magnitude of lottery payoffs. In addition to this, we show that these representative CPT individuals can exhibit some surprising combinations of second with third and fourth order risk attitudes. Throughout the paper, we contrast our theoretical predictions with results reported in the literature and we are able to reconcile some conflicting evidence on higher order risk preferences.

AB - This is the first paper to provide a comprehensive theoretical analysis of the third and fourth order lottery preferences implied by cumulative prospect theory (CPT). We consider the lottery choices from three alternative reference points: the status quo, the expected payout and the MaxMin. We report a large number of new results given the standard assumptions about probability weighting. We demonstrate, for example, the general result that from the status quo reference point there is no third order reflection effect but there is a fourth order reflectioneffect. When the average payout or the MaxMin is the reference point, we lose generality but can demonstrate that representative individuals with power value functions can make prudent or imprudent, temperate or intemperate choices depending on the precise magnitude of lottery payoffs. In addition to this, we show that these representative CPT individuals can exhibit some surprising combinations of second with third and fourth order risk attitudes. Throughout the paper, we contrast our theoretical predictions with results reported in the literature and we are able to reconcile some conflicting evidence on higher order risk preferences.

KW - cumulative prospect theory

KW - decision making under risk

KW - experiments

KW - higher order preferences

KW - reflection effect

M3 - Working paper

T3 - Economics Working Papers Series

BT - On the Predictions of Cumulative Prospect Theory for Third and Fourth Order Preferences

PB - Lancaster University, Department of Economics

CY - Lancaster

ER -