Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > One of Us or One of Them?

Electronic data

  • One_of_us_or_one_of_them_cover_page (1)

    Rights statement: ©American Psychological Association, 2020. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. Please do not copy or cite without author's permission. The final article is available, upon publication, at: 10.1037/ppm0000322

    Accepted author manuscript, 90.5 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

One of Us or One of Them?: How "Peripheral" Adverts on Social Media Affect the Social Categorization of Sociopolitical Message Givers

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

One of Us or One of Them? How "Peripheral" Adverts on Social Media Affect the Social Categorization of Sociopolitical Message Givers. / Wilkins, Denise J.; Livingstone, Andrew G.; Levine, Mark.
In: PSYCHOLOGY OF POPULAR MEDIA, Vol. 10, No. 3, 31.07.2021, p. 372-381.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Wilkins DJ, Livingstone AG, Levine M. One of Us or One of Them? How "Peripheral" Adverts on Social Media Affect the Social Categorization of Sociopolitical Message Givers. PSYCHOLOGY OF POPULAR MEDIA. 2021 Jul 31;10(3):372-381. Epub 2020 Nov 30. doi: 10.1037/ppm0000322

Author

Wilkins, Denise J. ; Livingstone, Andrew G. ; Levine, Mark. / One of Us or One of Them? How "Peripheral" Adverts on Social Media Affect the Social Categorization of Sociopolitical Message Givers. In: PSYCHOLOGY OF POPULAR MEDIA. 2021 ; Vol. 10, No. 3. pp. 372-381.

Bibtex

@article{5684410e373c443baca067a4dd7cc4b0,
title = "One of Us or One of Them?: How {"}Peripheral{"} Adverts on Social Media Affect the Social Categorization of Sociopolitical Message Givers",
abstract = "Social media is used for political influence, but do digital advertisements have the power to shape how users interpret the sociopolitical messages that are shared through social media? In 2 experiments (ns = 86 and 225), we tested whether digital advertisements have the capacity to act as identity signals, affecting the degree to which the source of a sociopolitical message is perceived as an outgroup—rather than ingroup—member. We also examined whether these perceptions predict one form of sociopolitical behavior: solidarity-based collective action. Participants viewed an online blog that asked them to take collective action to support an outgroup. Simultaneously, ostensibly incidental banner advertisements were presented alongside the blog. In Study 1, these adverts related to either the outgroup, superordinate category, or neither category: Compared with control, digital advertisements relating to the outgroup led to a greater likelihood that the message source would be categorized as an outgroup member. In Study 2, the adverts related to either the outgroup, ingroup, or neither: Adverts relating to the ingroup led to reduced likelihood that the source would be categorized as an outgroup member, relative to adverts relating to the outgroup. In Study 1, social categorization of the message source, in turn, predicted solidarity-based collective action, moderated by social identification with the outgroup; however, there was no such association in Study 2. Our findings contribute to debates about the impact of social media on democracy, and the importance of transparency and accountability in how social media environments are curated.",
keywords = "social media, advertising, solidarity-based collective action, social categorization, social identification",
author = "Wilkins, {Denise J.} and Livingstone, {Andrew G.} and Mark Levine",
note = "{\textcopyright}American Psychological Association, 2020. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. Please do not copy or cite without author's permission. The final article is available, upon publication, at: 10.1037/ppm0000322",
year = "2021",
month = jul,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1037/ppm0000322",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "372--381",
journal = "PSYCHOLOGY OF POPULAR MEDIA",
issn = "2689-6567",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - One of Us or One of Them?

T2 - How "Peripheral" Adverts on Social Media Affect the Social Categorization of Sociopolitical Message Givers

AU - Wilkins, Denise J.

AU - Livingstone, Andrew G.

AU - Levine, Mark

N1 - ©American Psychological Association, 2020. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. Please do not copy or cite without author's permission. The final article is available, upon publication, at: 10.1037/ppm0000322

PY - 2021/7/31

Y1 - 2021/7/31

N2 - Social media is used for political influence, but do digital advertisements have the power to shape how users interpret the sociopolitical messages that are shared through social media? In 2 experiments (ns = 86 and 225), we tested whether digital advertisements have the capacity to act as identity signals, affecting the degree to which the source of a sociopolitical message is perceived as an outgroup—rather than ingroup—member. We also examined whether these perceptions predict one form of sociopolitical behavior: solidarity-based collective action. Participants viewed an online blog that asked them to take collective action to support an outgroup. Simultaneously, ostensibly incidental banner advertisements were presented alongside the blog. In Study 1, these adverts related to either the outgroup, superordinate category, or neither category: Compared with control, digital advertisements relating to the outgroup led to a greater likelihood that the message source would be categorized as an outgroup member. In Study 2, the adverts related to either the outgroup, ingroup, or neither: Adverts relating to the ingroup led to reduced likelihood that the source would be categorized as an outgroup member, relative to adverts relating to the outgroup. In Study 1, social categorization of the message source, in turn, predicted solidarity-based collective action, moderated by social identification with the outgroup; however, there was no such association in Study 2. Our findings contribute to debates about the impact of social media on democracy, and the importance of transparency and accountability in how social media environments are curated.

AB - Social media is used for political influence, but do digital advertisements have the power to shape how users interpret the sociopolitical messages that are shared through social media? In 2 experiments (ns = 86 and 225), we tested whether digital advertisements have the capacity to act as identity signals, affecting the degree to which the source of a sociopolitical message is perceived as an outgroup—rather than ingroup—member. We also examined whether these perceptions predict one form of sociopolitical behavior: solidarity-based collective action. Participants viewed an online blog that asked them to take collective action to support an outgroup. Simultaneously, ostensibly incidental banner advertisements were presented alongside the blog. In Study 1, these adverts related to either the outgroup, superordinate category, or neither category: Compared with control, digital advertisements relating to the outgroup led to a greater likelihood that the message source would be categorized as an outgroup member. In Study 2, the adverts related to either the outgroup, ingroup, or neither: Adverts relating to the ingroup led to reduced likelihood that the source would be categorized as an outgroup member, relative to adverts relating to the outgroup. In Study 1, social categorization of the message source, in turn, predicted solidarity-based collective action, moderated by social identification with the outgroup; however, there was no such association in Study 2. Our findings contribute to debates about the impact of social media on democracy, and the importance of transparency and accountability in how social media environments are curated.

KW - social media

KW - advertising

KW - solidarity-based collective action

KW - social categorization

KW - social identification

U2 - 10.1037/ppm0000322

DO - 10.1037/ppm0000322

M3 - Journal article

VL - 10

SP - 372

EP - 381

JO - PSYCHOLOGY OF POPULAR MEDIA

JF - PSYCHOLOGY OF POPULAR MEDIA

SN - 2689-6567

IS - 3

ER -