Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Ontario conservation authorities – end, evolve,...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Ontario conservation authorities – end, evolve, interlude or epiphany?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Ontario conservation authorities – end, evolve, interlude or epiphany? / Mitchell, Bruce ; Shrubsole, Daniel; Watson, Nigel.
In: Canadian Water Resources Journal, Vol. 46, No. 3, 30.09.2021, p. 139-152.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Mitchell, B, Shrubsole, D & Watson, N 2021, 'Ontario conservation authorities – end, evolve, interlude or epiphany?', Canadian Water Resources Journal, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 139-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/07011784.2021.1930585

APA

Vancouver

Mitchell B, Shrubsole D, Watson N. Ontario conservation authorities – end, evolve, interlude or epiphany? Canadian Water Resources Journal. 2021 Sept 30;46(3):139-152. Epub 2021 Jun 7. doi: 10.1080/07011784.2021.1930585

Author

Mitchell, Bruce ; Shrubsole, Daniel ; Watson, Nigel. / Ontario conservation authorities – end, evolve, interlude or epiphany?. In: Canadian Water Resources Journal. 2021 ; Vol. 46, No. 3. pp. 139-152.

Bibtex

@article{fd38c2de01af4a9cb271ac9707a31a04,
title = "Ontario conservation authorities – end, evolve, interlude or epiphany?",
abstract = "Ontario Conservation Authorities (CAs) were established in 1946 as a partnership between the Ontario provincial government and municipalities. Initially, their purpose was to apply a catchment or watershed approach to provide services and programs to reduce risk from flooding and erosion through an integrated approach to water and land management. In 2021, there are 36 conservation authorities. We consider key changes the Ontario Government has initiated or will be initiating related to CAs which are: (1) The relevant provincial Minister will have authority to approve specific development proposals or for an entire class of permits for a specified period of time in areas within CAs, even if the CAs oppose such development because the proposals involve areas vulnerable to flooding or other related hazards; and (2) Applicants for development permits will be able to appeal directly to the Provincial Minister and also the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) if their application is turned down by the Hearing Board of the relevant CA. This commentary describes key issues that have been historically noted as {\textquoteleft}problematic{\textquoteright} for previous and the current Provincial Governments, and shares information and insight on those matters. The conclusion considers whether the changes represent an end, an evolution, an interlude (an intervening period, an opportunity to recalibrate or refocus) or an epiphany (a moment of insight or understanding), or some combination thereof, for the CAs.",
keywords = "Conservation authoritiesnershipchange, Ontario, catchment approach, provincial-municipal partnership, change",
author = "Bruce Mitchell and Daniel Shrubsole and Nigel Watson",
year = "2021",
month = sep,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1080/07011784.2021.1930585",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "139--152",
journal = "Canadian Water Resources Journal",
issn = "1918-1817",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ontario conservation authorities – end, evolve, interlude or epiphany?

AU - Mitchell, Bruce

AU - Shrubsole, Daniel

AU - Watson, Nigel

PY - 2021/9/30

Y1 - 2021/9/30

N2 - Ontario Conservation Authorities (CAs) were established in 1946 as a partnership between the Ontario provincial government and municipalities. Initially, their purpose was to apply a catchment or watershed approach to provide services and programs to reduce risk from flooding and erosion through an integrated approach to water and land management. In 2021, there are 36 conservation authorities. We consider key changes the Ontario Government has initiated or will be initiating related to CAs which are: (1) The relevant provincial Minister will have authority to approve specific development proposals or for an entire class of permits for a specified period of time in areas within CAs, even if the CAs oppose such development because the proposals involve areas vulnerable to flooding or other related hazards; and (2) Applicants for development permits will be able to appeal directly to the Provincial Minister and also the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) if their application is turned down by the Hearing Board of the relevant CA. This commentary describes key issues that have been historically noted as ‘problematic’ for previous and the current Provincial Governments, and shares information and insight on those matters. The conclusion considers whether the changes represent an end, an evolution, an interlude (an intervening period, an opportunity to recalibrate or refocus) or an epiphany (a moment of insight or understanding), or some combination thereof, for the CAs.

AB - Ontario Conservation Authorities (CAs) were established in 1946 as a partnership between the Ontario provincial government and municipalities. Initially, their purpose was to apply a catchment or watershed approach to provide services and programs to reduce risk from flooding and erosion through an integrated approach to water and land management. In 2021, there are 36 conservation authorities. We consider key changes the Ontario Government has initiated or will be initiating related to CAs which are: (1) The relevant provincial Minister will have authority to approve specific development proposals or for an entire class of permits for a specified period of time in areas within CAs, even if the CAs oppose such development because the proposals involve areas vulnerable to flooding or other related hazards; and (2) Applicants for development permits will be able to appeal directly to the Provincial Minister and also the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) if their application is turned down by the Hearing Board of the relevant CA. This commentary describes key issues that have been historically noted as ‘problematic’ for previous and the current Provincial Governments, and shares information and insight on those matters. The conclusion considers whether the changes represent an end, an evolution, an interlude (an intervening period, an opportunity to recalibrate or refocus) or an epiphany (a moment of insight or understanding), or some combination thereof, for the CAs.

KW - Conservation authoritiesnershipchange

KW - Ontario

KW - catchment approach

KW - provincial-municipal partnership

KW - change

U2 - 10.1080/07011784.2021.1930585

DO - 10.1080/07011784.2021.1930585

M3 - Journal article

VL - 46

SP - 139

EP - 152

JO - Canadian Water Resources Journal

JF - Canadian Water Resources Journal

SN - 1918-1817

IS - 3

ER -