Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Ontology in organization and management studies...
View graph of relations

Ontology in organization and management studies: a critical realist perspective

Research output: Working paper

Published

Standard

Ontology in organization and management studies: a critical realist perspective. / Fleetwood, Steve.
Lancaster University: The Department of Organisation, Work and Technology, 2005. (Organisation, Work and Technology Working Paper Series).

Research output: Working paper

Harvard

Fleetwood, S 2005 'Ontology in organization and management studies: a critical realist perspective' Organisation, Work and Technology Working Paper Series, The Department of Organisation, Work and Technology, Lancaster University.

APA

Fleetwood, S. (2005). Ontology in organization and management studies: a critical realist perspective. (Organisation, Work and Technology Working Paper Series). The Department of Organisation, Work and Technology.

Vancouver

Fleetwood S. Ontology in organization and management studies: a critical realist perspective. Lancaster University: The Department of Organisation, Work and Technology. 2005. (Organisation, Work and Technology Working Paper Series).

Author

Fleetwood, Steve. / Ontology in organization and management studies: a critical realist perspective. Lancaster University : The Department of Organisation, Work and Technology, 2005. (Organisation, Work and Technology Working Paper Series).

Bibtex

@techreport{30fe7edcb726444bab33880b688ddf61,
title = "Ontology in organization and management studies: a critical realist perspective",
abstract = "Organization Studies has recently been captured by a cultural, linguistic, poststructural or postmodern turn, the impetus for which has come from the ontological turn from a (na{\"i}ve) realist ontology to a socially constructed ontology. Much of the current ontological discussion is, however, characterised by ambiguity which makes it difficult to get to the bottom of ontological claims and, of course, to locate the source of any ontological errors. This paper uses a critical realist perspective to highlight the ambiguity and error encouraged by postmodernism{\textquoteright}s commitment to a socially constructed ontology. Critical realism{\textquoteright}s ontology is offered as a more fruitful alternative. Labour process theory, specifically agency and structure to demonstrate (i) critical realism is not damaged by many common postmodern criticisms of agency and structure and (ii) once interpreted through the prism of critical realism, there is no need to abandon this powerful analytical device.",
author = "Steve Fleetwood",
year = "2005",
language = "English",
series = "Organisation, Work and Technology Working Paper Series",
publisher = "The Department of Organisation, Work and Technology",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "The Department of Organisation, Work and Technology",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Ontology in organization and management studies: a critical realist perspective

AU - Fleetwood, Steve

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Organization Studies has recently been captured by a cultural, linguistic, poststructural or postmodern turn, the impetus for which has come from the ontological turn from a (naïve) realist ontology to a socially constructed ontology. Much of the current ontological discussion is, however, characterised by ambiguity which makes it difficult to get to the bottom of ontological claims and, of course, to locate the source of any ontological errors. This paper uses a critical realist perspective to highlight the ambiguity and error encouraged by postmodernism’s commitment to a socially constructed ontology. Critical realism’s ontology is offered as a more fruitful alternative. Labour process theory, specifically agency and structure to demonstrate (i) critical realism is not damaged by many common postmodern criticisms of agency and structure and (ii) once interpreted through the prism of critical realism, there is no need to abandon this powerful analytical device.

AB - Organization Studies has recently been captured by a cultural, linguistic, poststructural or postmodern turn, the impetus for which has come from the ontological turn from a (naïve) realist ontology to a socially constructed ontology. Much of the current ontological discussion is, however, characterised by ambiguity which makes it difficult to get to the bottom of ontological claims and, of course, to locate the source of any ontological errors. This paper uses a critical realist perspective to highlight the ambiguity and error encouraged by postmodernism’s commitment to a socially constructed ontology. Critical realism’s ontology is offered as a more fruitful alternative. Labour process theory, specifically agency and structure to demonstrate (i) critical realism is not damaged by many common postmodern criticisms of agency and structure and (ii) once interpreted through the prism of critical realism, there is no need to abandon this powerful analytical device.

M3 - Working paper

T3 - Organisation, Work and Technology Working Paper Series

BT - Ontology in organization and management studies: a critical realist perspective

PB - The Department of Organisation, Work and Technology

CY - Lancaster University

ER -