Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Open innovation deficiency

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Open innovation deficiency: evidence on project abandonment and delay

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

E-pub ahead of print

Standard

Open innovation deficiency: evidence on project abandonment and delay. / van Criekingen, Kristof; Freel, Mark; Czarnitzki, Dirk.
In: The Journal of Technology Transfer, 02.09.2025.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

van Criekingen, K., Freel, M., & Czarnitzki, D. (2025). Open innovation deficiency: evidence on project abandonment and delay. The Journal of Technology Transfer. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-025-10261-3

Vancouver

van Criekingen K, Freel M, Czarnitzki D. Open innovation deficiency: evidence on project abandonment and delay. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2025 Sept 2. Epub 2025 Sept 2. doi: 10.1007/s10961-025-10261-3

Author

van Criekingen, Kristof ; Freel, Mark ; Czarnitzki, Dirk. / Open innovation deficiency : evidence on project abandonment and delay. In: The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2025.

Bibtex

@article{c58a486206934ed097dbfe24c3b6b15e,
title = "Open innovation deficiency: evidence on project abandonment and delay",
abstract = "The concept of Open Innovation (OI) has breathed new life into both empirical research and industry practice concerned with distributed and collaborative modes of innovating. While much of the empirical literature has emphasised the innovation enhancing benefits, our study extends existing work that has recorded the limits to open innovation. Using a sample of Belgian firms, we document that open innovation leads to higher rates of project abandonment and to lower rates of project completion; the latter suggesting the presence of delays and interruptions. Among other robustness tests, we address the concern that openness could be endogenous with regard to project abandonment. As we also find that higher abandonment rates coincide with lower future firm performance, we conclude that open innovation may have negative effects on firms{\textquoteright} innovation outcomes because of higher rates of project failures and hold-ups.",
author = "{van Criekingen}, Kristof and Mark Freel and Dirk Czarnitzki",
year = "2025",
month = sep,
day = "2",
doi = "10.1007/s10961-025-10261-3",
language = "English",
journal = "The Journal of Technology Transfer",
issn = "0892-9912",
publisher = "Kluwer Academic Publishers",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Open innovation deficiency

T2 - evidence on project abandonment and delay

AU - van Criekingen, Kristof

AU - Freel, Mark

AU - Czarnitzki, Dirk

PY - 2025/9/2

Y1 - 2025/9/2

N2 - The concept of Open Innovation (OI) has breathed new life into both empirical research and industry practice concerned with distributed and collaborative modes of innovating. While much of the empirical literature has emphasised the innovation enhancing benefits, our study extends existing work that has recorded the limits to open innovation. Using a sample of Belgian firms, we document that open innovation leads to higher rates of project abandonment and to lower rates of project completion; the latter suggesting the presence of delays and interruptions. Among other robustness tests, we address the concern that openness could be endogenous with regard to project abandonment. As we also find that higher abandonment rates coincide with lower future firm performance, we conclude that open innovation may have negative effects on firms’ innovation outcomes because of higher rates of project failures and hold-ups.

AB - The concept of Open Innovation (OI) has breathed new life into both empirical research and industry practice concerned with distributed and collaborative modes of innovating. While much of the empirical literature has emphasised the innovation enhancing benefits, our study extends existing work that has recorded the limits to open innovation. Using a sample of Belgian firms, we document that open innovation leads to higher rates of project abandonment and to lower rates of project completion; the latter suggesting the presence of delays and interruptions. Among other robustness tests, we address the concern that openness could be endogenous with regard to project abandonment. As we also find that higher abandonment rates coincide with lower future firm performance, we conclude that open innovation may have negative effects on firms’ innovation outcomes because of higher rates of project failures and hold-ups.

U2 - 10.1007/s10961-025-10261-3

DO - 10.1007/s10961-025-10261-3

M3 - Journal article

JO - The Journal of Technology Transfer

JF - The Journal of Technology Transfer

SN - 0892-9912

ER -