Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Optimal approaches to the quality control check...

Electronic data

  • Smith-Spark Katz Marchant & Wilcockson IJIE paper SECOND REVISION

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 68, 2018 DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2018.07.003

    Accepted author manuscript, 457 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Optimal approaches to the quality control checking of product labels

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>11/2018
<mark>Journal</mark>International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
Volume68
Number of pages7
Pages (from-to)118-124
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date17/07/18
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Quality control checkers at fresh produce packaging facilities occasionally fail to detect incorrect information presented on labels. Despite being infrequent, such errors have significant financial and environmental repercussions. To understand why label-checking errors occur, observations and interviews were undertaken at a large packaging facility and followed up with a laboratory-based label-checking task. The observations highlighted the dynamic, complex environment in which label-checking took place, whilst the interviews revealed that operatives had not received formal training in label-checking. On the laboratory-based task, overall error detection accuracy was high but considerable individual differences were found between professional label-checkers. Response times were shorter when participants failed to detect label errors, suggesting incomplete checking or ineffective checking strategies. Furthermore, eye movement recordings indicated that checkers who adopted a systematic approach to checking were more successful in detecting errors. The extent to which a label checker adopted a systematic approach was not found to correlate with the number of years of experience that they had accrued in label-checking. To minimize the chances of label errors going undetected, explicit instruction and training, personnel selection and/or the use of software to guide performance towards a more systematic approach is recommended.

Bibliographic note

This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 68, 2018 DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2018.07.003