Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Optimising airport slot allocation considering ...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Optimising airport slot allocation considering flight-scheduling flexibility and total airport capacity constraints

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Optimising airport slot allocation considering flight-scheduling flexibility and total airport capacity constraints. / Katsigiannis, Fotios A.; Zografos, K. G.
In: Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 146, 30.04.2021, p. 50-87.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Katsigiannis FA, Zografos KG. Optimising airport slot allocation considering flight-scheduling flexibility and total airport capacity constraints. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological. 2021 Apr 30;146:50-87. Epub 2021 Feb 26. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2021.02.002

Author

Bibtex

@article{7e11b6b7773b4599999bd1211e2ceed7,
title = "Optimising airport slot allocation considering flight-scheduling flexibility and total airport capacity constraints",
abstract = "The lack of airport capacity hinders the growth potential of global air travel, inflicting delays and economic losses to passengers, airlines, and airports. Airport Slot Allocation (ASA) is used in congested airports as a short-term measure for providing access to air-carriers to scarce airport resources. A rich literature has been developed during the last decade around the formulation and optimisation of the ASA problem using the IATA World Scheduling Guidelines (IATA WSG). However, existing models do not address airlines{\textquoteright} flight scheduling flexibility preferences which are expressed through the Timing Flexibility Indicator (TFI). Additionally, in considering the airport{\textquoteright}s capacity, existing ASA literature does not treat endogenously the allocation of the available airport capacity to match the demand{\textquoteright}s characteristics. This paper addresses these issues by proposing a novel modelling and solution framework that considers airlines{\textquoteright} flexibility preferences and its seamless integration with constraints that enable the dynamic allocation of the airport{\textquoteright}s resources. Our approach takes into account the number of rejected requests, the total, and maximum displacement objectives and addresses several primary and additional policy criteria of IATA WSG. The preferences of the airlines are introduced through the Timing Flexibility Indicator (TFI) which is incorporated in a weighted objective function considering the number of slot requests which fall within their specified TFI. The proposed framework benefits from valid tightening inequalities which reduce the required computational times. Our computational study using data from a coordinated airport suggests that the joint consideration of the TFI and the endogenous and dynamic capacity constraints, improves airport capacity utilisation, thus leading to improved airport slot schedules with reduced total and maximum displacement and significant improvements in terms of displaced slot requests and passengers.",
keywords = "airport slot scheduling, airport capacity management, mathematical modelling, mixed integer programming",
author = "Katsigiannis, {Fotios A.} and Zografos, {K. G.}",
year = "2021",
month = apr,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1016/j.trb.2021.02.002",
language = "English",
volume = "146",
pages = "50--87",
journal = "Transportation Research Part B: Methodological",
issn = "0191-2615",
publisher = "PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimising airport slot allocation considering flight-scheduling flexibility and total airport capacity constraints

AU - Katsigiannis, Fotios A.

AU - Zografos, K. G.

PY - 2021/4/30

Y1 - 2021/4/30

N2 - The lack of airport capacity hinders the growth potential of global air travel, inflicting delays and economic losses to passengers, airlines, and airports. Airport Slot Allocation (ASA) is used in congested airports as a short-term measure for providing access to air-carriers to scarce airport resources. A rich literature has been developed during the last decade around the formulation and optimisation of the ASA problem using the IATA World Scheduling Guidelines (IATA WSG). However, existing models do not address airlines’ flight scheduling flexibility preferences which are expressed through the Timing Flexibility Indicator (TFI). Additionally, in considering the airport’s capacity, existing ASA literature does not treat endogenously the allocation of the available airport capacity to match the demand’s characteristics. This paper addresses these issues by proposing a novel modelling and solution framework that considers airlines’ flexibility preferences and its seamless integration with constraints that enable the dynamic allocation of the airport’s resources. Our approach takes into account the number of rejected requests, the total, and maximum displacement objectives and addresses several primary and additional policy criteria of IATA WSG. The preferences of the airlines are introduced through the Timing Flexibility Indicator (TFI) which is incorporated in a weighted objective function considering the number of slot requests which fall within their specified TFI. The proposed framework benefits from valid tightening inequalities which reduce the required computational times. Our computational study using data from a coordinated airport suggests that the joint consideration of the TFI and the endogenous and dynamic capacity constraints, improves airport capacity utilisation, thus leading to improved airport slot schedules with reduced total and maximum displacement and significant improvements in terms of displaced slot requests and passengers.

AB - The lack of airport capacity hinders the growth potential of global air travel, inflicting delays and economic losses to passengers, airlines, and airports. Airport Slot Allocation (ASA) is used in congested airports as a short-term measure for providing access to air-carriers to scarce airport resources. A rich literature has been developed during the last decade around the formulation and optimisation of the ASA problem using the IATA World Scheduling Guidelines (IATA WSG). However, existing models do not address airlines’ flight scheduling flexibility preferences which are expressed through the Timing Flexibility Indicator (TFI). Additionally, in considering the airport’s capacity, existing ASA literature does not treat endogenously the allocation of the available airport capacity to match the demand’s characteristics. This paper addresses these issues by proposing a novel modelling and solution framework that considers airlines’ flexibility preferences and its seamless integration with constraints that enable the dynamic allocation of the airport’s resources. Our approach takes into account the number of rejected requests, the total, and maximum displacement objectives and addresses several primary and additional policy criteria of IATA WSG. The preferences of the airlines are introduced through the Timing Flexibility Indicator (TFI) which is incorporated in a weighted objective function considering the number of slot requests which fall within their specified TFI. The proposed framework benefits from valid tightening inequalities which reduce the required computational times. Our computational study using data from a coordinated airport suggests that the joint consideration of the TFI and the endogenous and dynamic capacity constraints, improves airport capacity utilisation, thus leading to improved airport slot schedules with reduced total and maximum displacement and significant improvements in terms of displaced slot requests and passengers.

KW - airport slot scheduling

KW - airport capacity management

KW - mathematical modelling

KW - mixed integer programming

U2 - 10.1016/j.trb.2021.02.002

DO - 10.1016/j.trb.2021.02.002

M3 - Journal article

VL - 146

SP - 50

EP - 87

JO - Transportation Research Part B: Methodological

JF - Transportation Research Part B: Methodological

SN - 0191-2615

ER -