Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Organic compounds in the environment

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Organic compounds in the environment: Validation of procedures to quantify nonextractable polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon residues in soil

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Organic compounds in the environment: Validation of procedures to quantify nonextractable polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon residues in soil. / Northcott, Grant L.; Jones, Kevin C.
In: Journal of Environmental Quality, Vol. 32, No. 2, 01.03.2003, p. 571-582.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Northcott GL, Jones KC. Organic compounds in the environment: Validation of procedures to quantify nonextractable polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon residues in soil. Journal of Environmental Quality. 2003 Mar 1;32(2):571-582. doi: 10.2134/jeq2003.5710

Author

Bibtex

@article{755aba5ecff14949a6860fc5662c8d03,
title = "Organic compounds in the environment: Validation of procedures to quantify nonextractable polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon residues in soil",
abstract = "This study was conducted to optimize butanol solvent shake extraction, dichloromethane soxtec extraction, and methanolic saponification extraction for the selective extraction of aged polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from soil. Extraction kinetics for these methods was established to determine the optimal time necessary to achieve exhaustive compound extraction. This resulted in times of 12, 6, and 5 h, respectively, for butanol, dichloromethane, and saponification, to extract polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from previously spiked, then aged soil. Increasing the soil mass to butanol volume ratio reduced the proportion of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon extracted by butanol, highlighting the importance of determining and maintaining a constant soil to solvent ratio for comparative purposes. Drying soil samples before dichloromethane soxtec extraction reduced by 30 to 76% the amount of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons extracted. The effect of sample drying is discussed with relevance to enhancing the formation of nonextractable compounds in soil and compound losses previously assumed by volatilization. The optimized extraction procedures provided low variability with relative standard deviations ≤ 5.2% for analysis of multiple replicates. The results obtained by the optimized procedures provided equivalent or improved reproducibility to those obtained by other methods reported in the literature.",
author = "Northcott, {Grant L.} and Jones, {Kevin C.}",
year = "2003",
month = mar,
day = "1",
doi = "10.2134/jeq2003.5710",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "571--582",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Quality",
issn = "0047-2425",
publisher = "ASA/CSSA/SSSA",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Organic compounds in the environment

T2 - Validation of procedures to quantify nonextractable polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon residues in soil

AU - Northcott, Grant L.

AU - Jones, Kevin C.

PY - 2003/3/1

Y1 - 2003/3/1

N2 - This study was conducted to optimize butanol solvent shake extraction, dichloromethane soxtec extraction, and methanolic saponification extraction for the selective extraction of aged polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from soil. Extraction kinetics for these methods was established to determine the optimal time necessary to achieve exhaustive compound extraction. This resulted in times of 12, 6, and 5 h, respectively, for butanol, dichloromethane, and saponification, to extract polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from previously spiked, then aged soil. Increasing the soil mass to butanol volume ratio reduced the proportion of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon extracted by butanol, highlighting the importance of determining and maintaining a constant soil to solvent ratio for comparative purposes. Drying soil samples before dichloromethane soxtec extraction reduced by 30 to 76% the amount of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons extracted. The effect of sample drying is discussed with relevance to enhancing the formation of nonextractable compounds in soil and compound losses previously assumed by volatilization. The optimized extraction procedures provided low variability with relative standard deviations ≤ 5.2% for analysis of multiple replicates. The results obtained by the optimized procedures provided equivalent or improved reproducibility to those obtained by other methods reported in the literature.

AB - This study was conducted to optimize butanol solvent shake extraction, dichloromethane soxtec extraction, and methanolic saponification extraction for the selective extraction of aged polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from soil. Extraction kinetics for these methods was established to determine the optimal time necessary to achieve exhaustive compound extraction. This resulted in times of 12, 6, and 5 h, respectively, for butanol, dichloromethane, and saponification, to extract polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from previously spiked, then aged soil. Increasing the soil mass to butanol volume ratio reduced the proportion of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon extracted by butanol, highlighting the importance of determining and maintaining a constant soil to solvent ratio for comparative purposes. Drying soil samples before dichloromethane soxtec extraction reduced by 30 to 76% the amount of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons extracted. The effect of sample drying is discussed with relevance to enhancing the formation of nonextractable compounds in soil and compound losses previously assumed by volatilization. The optimized extraction procedures provided low variability with relative standard deviations ≤ 5.2% for analysis of multiple replicates. The results obtained by the optimized procedures provided equivalent or improved reproducibility to those obtained by other methods reported in the literature.

U2 - 10.2134/jeq2003.5710

DO - 10.2134/jeq2003.5710

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 12708681

AN - SCOPUS:0037346115

VL - 32

SP - 571

EP - 582

JO - Journal of Environmental Quality

JF - Journal of Environmental Quality

SN - 0047-2425

IS - 2

ER -