Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Organizational Resilience to Supply Chain Risks...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Organizational Resilience to Supply Chain Risks During the COVID‐19 Pandemic

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Organizational Resilience to Supply Chain Risks During the COVID‐19 Pandemic. / Wulandhari, Nur Baiti Ingga; Budhwar, Pawan; Mishra, Nishikant et al.
In: British Journal of Management, Vol. 34, No. 3, 31.07.2023, p. 1282-1315.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Wulandhari, NBI, Budhwar, P, Mishra, N, Akbar, S, Do, Q & Milligan, G 2023, 'Organizational Resilience to Supply Chain Risks During the COVID‐19 Pandemic', British Journal of Management, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 1282-1315. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12648

APA

Wulandhari, N. B. I., Budhwar, P., Mishra, N., Akbar, S., Do, Q., & Milligan, G. (2023). Organizational Resilience to Supply Chain Risks During the COVID‐19 Pandemic. British Journal of Management, 34(3), 1282-1315. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12648

Vancouver

Wulandhari NBI, Budhwar P, Mishra N, Akbar S, Do Q, Milligan G. Organizational Resilience to Supply Chain Risks During the COVID‐19 Pandemic. British Journal of Management. 2023 Jul 31;34(3):1282-1315. Epub 2022 Aug 29. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.12648

Author

Wulandhari, Nur Baiti Ingga ; Budhwar, Pawan ; Mishra, Nishikant et al. / Organizational Resilience to Supply Chain Risks During the COVID‐19 Pandemic. In: British Journal of Management. 2023 ; Vol. 34, No. 3. pp. 1282-1315.

Bibtex

@article{37c74077c24945358de883be8ac52549,
title = "Organizational Resilience to Supply Chain Risks During the COVID‐19 Pandemic",
abstract = "This paper aims to establish a link between aggregate organizational resilience capabilities and managerial risk perception aspects during a major global crisis. We argue that a multi‐theory perspective, dynamic capability at an organizational level and enactment theory at a managerial level allow us to better understand how the sensemaking process within managerial risk perception assists organizational resilience. We draw from in‐depth interviews with 40 managers across the UK's food industry, which has been able to display resilience during the pandemic. In sensing supply chain risks (SCRs), managers within both authority‐based and consensus‐based organizational structures utilize risk‐capture heuristics and enact actions related to effective communications, albeit at different information costs. In seizing, we found that managers adhere to distinct heuristics that are idiosyncratic to their organizational structures. Through limited horizontal communication channels, authority‐based structures adhere to rudimentary how‐to heuristics, whereas consensus‐based structures use obtainable how‐to heuristics. We contribute to the organizational resilience and dynamic capabilities literature by identifying assessment as an additional step prior to transforming, which depicts a retention process to inform future judgements. Our study presents a novel framework of organizational resilience to SCRs during equivocal environments, by providing a nuanced understanding of the construction of dynamic capabilities through sensemaking.",
author = "Wulandhari, {Nur Baiti Ingga} and Pawan Budhwar and Nishikant Mishra and Saeed Akbar and Quynh Do and Gavin Milligan",
year = "2023",
month = jul,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1111/1467-8551.12648",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "1282--1315",
journal = "British Journal of Management",
issn = "1045-3172",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Organizational Resilience to Supply Chain Risks During the COVID‐19 Pandemic

AU - Wulandhari, Nur Baiti Ingga

AU - Budhwar, Pawan

AU - Mishra, Nishikant

AU - Akbar, Saeed

AU - Do, Quynh

AU - Milligan, Gavin

PY - 2023/7/31

Y1 - 2023/7/31

N2 - This paper aims to establish a link between aggregate organizational resilience capabilities and managerial risk perception aspects during a major global crisis. We argue that a multi‐theory perspective, dynamic capability at an organizational level and enactment theory at a managerial level allow us to better understand how the sensemaking process within managerial risk perception assists organizational resilience. We draw from in‐depth interviews with 40 managers across the UK's food industry, which has been able to display resilience during the pandemic. In sensing supply chain risks (SCRs), managers within both authority‐based and consensus‐based organizational structures utilize risk‐capture heuristics and enact actions related to effective communications, albeit at different information costs. In seizing, we found that managers adhere to distinct heuristics that are idiosyncratic to their organizational structures. Through limited horizontal communication channels, authority‐based structures adhere to rudimentary how‐to heuristics, whereas consensus‐based structures use obtainable how‐to heuristics. We contribute to the organizational resilience and dynamic capabilities literature by identifying assessment as an additional step prior to transforming, which depicts a retention process to inform future judgements. Our study presents a novel framework of organizational resilience to SCRs during equivocal environments, by providing a nuanced understanding of the construction of dynamic capabilities through sensemaking.

AB - This paper aims to establish a link between aggregate organizational resilience capabilities and managerial risk perception aspects during a major global crisis. We argue that a multi‐theory perspective, dynamic capability at an organizational level and enactment theory at a managerial level allow us to better understand how the sensemaking process within managerial risk perception assists organizational resilience. We draw from in‐depth interviews with 40 managers across the UK's food industry, which has been able to display resilience during the pandemic. In sensing supply chain risks (SCRs), managers within both authority‐based and consensus‐based organizational structures utilize risk‐capture heuristics and enact actions related to effective communications, albeit at different information costs. In seizing, we found that managers adhere to distinct heuristics that are idiosyncratic to their organizational structures. Through limited horizontal communication channels, authority‐based structures adhere to rudimentary how‐to heuristics, whereas consensus‐based structures use obtainable how‐to heuristics. We contribute to the organizational resilience and dynamic capabilities literature by identifying assessment as an additional step prior to transforming, which depicts a retention process to inform future judgements. Our study presents a novel framework of organizational resilience to SCRs during equivocal environments, by providing a nuanced understanding of the construction of dynamic capabilities through sensemaking.

U2 - 10.1111/1467-8551.12648

DO - 10.1111/1467-8551.12648

M3 - Journal article

VL - 34

SP - 1282

EP - 1315

JO - British Journal of Management

JF - British Journal of Management

SN - 1045-3172

IS - 3

ER -