Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Outcome measures for economic evaluations and c...

Research

Associated organisational units

Links

Text available via DOI:

Keywords

View graph of relations

Outcome measures for economic evaluations and cost‐effectiveness analyses of interventions for people with intellectual disabilities: A methodological systematic review

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Review article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Outcome measures for economic evaluations and cost‐effectiveness analyses of interventions for people with intellectual disabilities: A methodological systematic review. / Benedetto, Valerio; Filipe, Luís; Harris, Catherine et al.
In: Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, Vol. 36, No. 2, 31.03.2023, p. 230-240.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Review article › peer-review

Harvard

Benedetto, V, Filipe, L, Harris, C, Tahir, N, Doherty, A & Clegg, A 2023, 'Outcome measures for economic evaluations and cost‐effectiveness analyses of interventions for people with intellectual disabilities: A methodological systematic review', Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 230-240. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.13056

APA

Benedetto, V., Filipe, L., Harris, C., Tahir, N., Doherty, A., & Clegg, A. (2023). Outcome measures for economic evaluations and cost‐effectiveness analyses of interventions for people with intellectual disabilities: A methodological systematic review. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 36(2), 230-240. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.13056

Vancouver

Benedetto V, Filipe L, Harris C, Tahir N, Doherty A, Clegg A. Outcome measures for economic evaluations and cost‐effectiveness analyses of interventions for people with intellectual disabilities: A methodological systematic review. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities. 2023 Mar 31;36(2):230-240. Epub 2022 Nov 30. doi: 10.1111/jar.13056

Author

Benedetto, Valerio ; Filipe, Luís ; Harris, Catherine et al. / Outcome measures for economic evaluations and cost‐effectiveness analyses of interventions for people with intellectual disabilities : A methodological systematic review. In: Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities. 2023 ; Vol. 36, No. 2. pp. 230-240.

Bibtex

@article{fcc5fd2cbbe84432bc672dc8fae4e117,
title = "Outcome measures for economic evaluations and cost‐effectiveness analyses of interventions for people with intellectual disabilities: A methodological systematic review",
abstract = "Background: Mainstream economic evaluations methods may not be appropriate to capture the range of effects triggered by interventions for people with intellectual disabilities. In this systematic review, we aimed to identify, assess and synthesise the arguments in the literature on how the effects of interventions for people with intellectual disabilities could be measured in economic evaluations. Method: We searched for studies providing relevant arguments by running multi‐database, backward, forward citation and grey literature searches. Following title/abstract and full‐text screening, the arguments extracted from the included studies were summarised and qualitatively assessed in a narrative synthesis. Results: Our final analysis included three studies, with their arguments summarised in different methodological areas. Conclusions: Based on the evidence, we suggest the use of techniques more attuned to the population with intellectual disabilities, such sensitive preference‐based instruments to collect health states data, and mapping algorithms to obtain utility values.",
keywords = "REVIEW, REVIEWS, cost‐effectiveness, economic evaluations, intellectual disabilities /disability, outcome measures, QALY",
author = "Valerio Benedetto and Lu{\'i}s Filipe and Catherine Harris and Naheed Tahir and Alison Doherty and Andrew Clegg",
year = "2023",
month = mar,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1111/jar.13056",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "230--240",
journal = "Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities",
issn = "1360-2322",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outcome measures for economic evaluations and cost‐effectiveness analyses of interventions for people with intellectual disabilities

T2 - A methodological systematic review

AU - Benedetto, Valerio

AU - Filipe, Luís

AU - Harris, Catherine

AU - Tahir, Naheed

AU - Doherty, Alison

AU - Clegg, Andrew

PY - 2023/3/31

Y1 - 2023/3/31

N2 - Background: Mainstream economic evaluations methods may not be appropriate to capture the range of effects triggered by interventions for people with intellectual disabilities. In this systematic review, we aimed to identify, assess and synthesise the arguments in the literature on how the effects of interventions for people with intellectual disabilities could be measured in economic evaluations. Method: We searched for studies providing relevant arguments by running multi‐database, backward, forward citation and grey literature searches. Following title/abstract and full‐text screening, the arguments extracted from the included studies were summarised and qualitatively assessed in a narrative synthesis. Results: Our final analysis included three studies, with their arguments summarised in different methodological areas. Conclusions: Based on the evidence, we suggest the use of techniques more attuned to the population with intellectual disabilities, such sensitive preference‐based instruments to collect health states data, and mapping algorithms to obtain utility values.

AB - Background: Mainstream economic evaluations methods may not be appropriate to capture the range of effects triggered by interventions for people with intellectual disabilities. In this systematic review, we aimed to identify, assess and synthesise the arguments in the literature on how the effects of interventions for people with intellectual disabilities could be measured in economic evaluations. Method: We searched for studies providing relevant arguments by running multi‐database, backward, forward citation and grey literature searches. Following title/abstract and full‐text screening, the arguments extracted from the included studies were summarised and qualitatively assessed in a narrative synthesis. Results: Our final analysis included three studies, with their arguments summarised in different methodological areas. Conclusions: Based on the evidence, we suggest the use of techniques more attuned to the population with intellectual disabilities, such sensitive preference‐based instruments to collect health states data, and mapping algorithms to obtain utility values.

KW - REVIEW

KW - REVIEWS

KW - cost‐effectiveness

KW - economic evaluations

KW - intellectual disabilities /disability

KW - outcome measures

KW - QALY

U2 - 10.1111/jar.13056

DO - 10.1111/jar.13056

M3 - Review article

C2 - 36448370

VL - 36

SP - 230

EP - 240

JO - Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities

JF - Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities

SN - 1360-2322

IS - 2

ER -