Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Panel statement: Why progress in (composite) fa...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Panel statement: Why progress in (composite) fault tolerant real-time systems has been slow (-er than expected... & what can we do about it?)

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Published

Standard

Panel statement: Why progress in (composite) fault tolerant real-time systems has been slow (-er than expected... & what can we do about it?). / Suri, Neeraj.
Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems, 2004.. IEEE, 2004. p. 112-113.

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Suri N. Panel statement: Why progress in (composite) fault tolerant real-time systems has been slow (-er than expected... & what can we do about it?). In Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems, 2004.. IEEE. 2004. p. 112-113 doi: 10.1109/RELDIS.2004.1353011

Author

Suri, Neeraj. / Panel statement: Why progress in (composite) fault tolerant real-time systems has been slow (-er than expected... & what can we do about it?). Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems, 2004.. IEEE, 2004. pp. 112-113

Bibtex

@inproceedings{25403be1787d43d6b06c2c8359924468,
title = "Panel statement: Why progress in (composite) fault tolerant real-time systems has been slow (-er than expected... & what can we do about it?)",
abstract = "The issues related to the slow progress in fault tolerant (FT) real-time (RT) systems, are discussed. For most computing systems, the need is not only to reliably obtain the desired services, but also to obtain the service within a specified time interval. Within the same system models of distributed and networked systems, the composite provisioning of RT and dependability often results in orthogonal concerns. Theoretical and conceptual advancements are essential for any proper scientific basis, and both FT and RT offer sophisticated developments.",
keywords = "Codes (symbols), Computer programming languages, Electromagnetic wave interference, Electronic commerce, Information technology, Middleware, Personal computers, Perturbation techniques, Product development, Real time systems, Redundancy, Telecommunication networks, Communication applications, Redundancy management, Resource management, UML specifications, Fault tolerant computer systems",
author = "Neeraj Suri",
year = "2004",
month = oct,
day = "18",
doi = "10.1109/RELDIS.2004.1353011",
language = "English",
isbn = "0769522394",
pages = "112--113",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems, 2004.",
publisher = "IEEE",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - Panel statement: Why progress in (composite) fault tolerant real-time systems has been slow (-er than expected... & what can we do about it?)

AU - Suri, Neeraj

PY - 2004/10/18

Y1 - 2004/10/18

N2 - The issues related to the slow progress in fault tolerant (FT) real-time (RT) systems, are discussed. For most computing systems, the need is not only to reliably obtain the desired services, but also to obtain the service within a specified time interval. Within the same system models of distributed and networked systems, the composite provisioning of RT and dependability often results in orthogonal concerns. Theoretical and conceptual advancements are essential for any proper scientific basis, and both FT and RT offer sophisticated developments.

AB - The issues related to the slow progress in fault tolerant (FT) real-time (RT) systems, are discussed. For most computing systems, the need is not only to reliably obtain the desired services, but also to obtain the service within a specified time interval. Within the same system models of distributed and networked systems, the composite provisioning of RT and dependability often results in orthogonal concerns. Theoretical and conceptual advancements are essential for any proper scientific basis, and both FT and RT offer sophisticated developments.

KW - Codes (symbols)

KW - Computer programming languages

KW - Electromagnetic wave interference

KW - Electronic commerce

KW - Information technology

KW - Middleware

KW - Personal computers

KW - Perturbation techniques

KW - Product development

KW - Real time systems

KW - Redundancy

KW - Telecommunication networks

KW - Communication applications

KW - Redundancy management

KW - Resource management

KW - UML specifications

KW - Fault tolerant computer systems

U2 - 10.1109/RELDIS.2004.1353011

DO - 10.1109/RELDIS.2004.1353011

M3 - Conference contribution/Paper

SN - 0769522394

SP - 112

EP - 113

BT - Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems, 2004.

PB - IEEE

ER -