Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Participant perceptions of different forms of d...

Research

Associated organisational unit

Electronic data

  • Ainscough_et_al._FINAL

    Accepted author manuscript, 489 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Participant perceptions of different forms of deliberative monetary valuation: Comparing democratic monetary valuation and deliberative democratic monetary valuation in the context of regional marine planning

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Participant perceptions of different forms of deliberative monetary valuation: Comparing democratic monetary valuation and deliberative democratic monetary valuation in the context of regional marine planning. / Ainscough, Jacob; Kenter, Jasper O.; Azzopardi, Elaine et al.
In: Environmental Values, Vol. 33, No. 2, 25.03.2024, p. 189-215.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Ainscough, J, Kenter, JO, Azzopardi, E & Wilson, AMW 2024, 'Participant perceptions of different forms of deliberative monetary valuation: Comparing democratic monetary valuation and deliberative democratic monetary valuation in the context of regional marine planning', Environmental Values, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 189-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/09632719241231510

APA

Ainscough, J., Kenter, J. O., Azzopardi, E., & Wilson, A. M. W. (2024). Participant perceptions of different forms of deliberative monetary valuation: Comparing democratic monetary valuation and deliberative democratic monetary valuation in the context of regional marine planning. Environmental Values, 33(2), 189-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/09632719241231510

Vancouver

Ainscough J, Kenter JO, Azzopardi E, Wilson AMW. Participant perceptions of different forms of deliberative monetary valuation: Comparing democratic monetary valuation and deliberative democratic monetary valuation in the context of regional marine planning. Environmental Values. 2024 Mar 25;33(2):189-215. doi: 10.1177/09632719241231510

Author

Ainscough, Jacob ; Kenter, Jasper O. ; Azzopardi, Elaine et al. / Participant perceptions of different forms of deliberative monetary valuation : Comparing democratic monetary valuation and deliberative democratic monetary valuation in the context of regional marine planning. In: Environmental Values. 2024 ; Vol. 33, No. 2. pp. 189-215.

Bibtex

@article{881f9409e6c84563a2025155ac61cbac,
title = "Participant perceptions of different forms of deliberative monetary valuation: Comparing democratic monetary valuation and deliberative democratic monetary valuation in the context of regional marine planning",
abstract = "As conceptual and theoretical discussions on environmental valuation approaches have advanced there is growing interest in the impact that valuation has on decision making. The perceived legitimacy of the outputs of valuation studies is seen as one factor influencing their impact on policy decisions. One element of this is ensuring that participants of valuation processes see the results as legitimate and would be willing to accept decisions based on these findings. Here, we test the perceived legitimacy to participants of two approaches to deliberative monetary valuation, deliberated preferences and Deliberative Democratic Monetary Valuation, in the context of marine planning in the Clyde estuary in Scotland. We compare and contrast deliberated preference and deliberative democratic monetary valuation and track their emergence as responses to critiques of conventional stated preference approaches. We then present the results of our case study where we found that deliberative democratic monetary valuation produced valuations that were perceived as more legitimate that deliberated preference as the basis for decision making by those involved in the valuation process. ",
author = "Jacob Ainscough and Kenter, {Jasper O.} and Elaine Azzopardi and Wilson, {A. Meriwether W.}",
year = "2024",
month = mar,
day = "25",
doi = "10.1177/09632719241231510",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "189--215",
journal = "Environmental Values",
issn = "0963-2719",
publisher = "White Horse Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Participant perceptions of different forms of deliberative monetary valuation

T2 - Comparing democratic monetary valuation and deliberative democratic monetary valuation in the context of regional marine planning

AU - Ainscough, Jacob

AU - Kenter, Jasper O.

AU - Azzopardi, Elaine

AU - Wilson, A. Meriwether W.

PY - 2024/3/25

Y1 - 2024/3/25

N2 - As conceptual and theoretical discussions on environmental valuation approaches have advanced there is growing interest in the impact that valuation has on decision making. The perceived legitimacy of the outputs of valuation studies is seen as one factor influencing their impact on policy decisions. One element of this is ensuring that participants of valuation processes see the results as legitimate and would be willing to accept decisions based on these findings. Here, we test the perceived legitimacy to participants of two approaches to deliberative monetary valuation, deliberated preferences and Deliberative Democratic Monetary Valuation, in the context of marine planning in the Clyde estuary in Scotland. We compare and contrast deliberated preference and deliberative democratic monetary valuation and track their emergence as responses to critiques of conventional stated preference approaches. We then present the results of our case study where we found that deliberative democratic monetary valuation produced valuations that were perceived as more legitimate that deliberated preference as the basis for decision making by those involved in the valuation process.

AB - As conceptual and theoretical discussions on environmental valuation approaches have advanced there is growing interest in the impact that valuation has on decision making. The perceived legitimacy of the outputs of valuation studies is seen as one factor influencing their impact on policy decisions. One element of this is ensuring that participants of valuation processes see the results as legitimate and would be willing to accept decisions based on these findings. Here, we test the perceived legitimacy to participants of two approaches to deliberative monetary valuation, deliberated preferences and Deliberative Democratic Monetary Valuation, in the context of marine planning in the Clyde estuary in Scotland. We compare and contrast deliberated preference and deliberative democratic monetary valuation and track their emergence as responses to critiques of conventional stated preference approaches. We then present the results of our case study where we found that deliberative democratic monetary valuation produced valuations that were perceived as more legitimate that deliberated preference as the basis for decision making by those involved in the valuation process.

U2 - 10.1177/09632719241231510

DO - 10.1177/09632719241231510

M3 - Journal article

VL - 33

SP - 189

EP - 215

JO - Environmental Values

JF - Environmental Values

SN - 0963-2719

IS - 2

ER -