Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Partnerships between the Independent Sector and...

Research

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Partnerships between the Independent Sector and the Probation Service

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Partnerships between the Independent Sector and the Probation Service. / Smith, David; Paylor, Ian; Mitchell, Peter.
In: The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, Vol. 32, No. 1, 02.1993, p. 25-38.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Smith, D, Paylor, I & Mitchell, P 1993, 'Partnerships between the Independent Sector and the Probation Service', The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 25-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2311.1993.tb00757.x

APA

Smith, D., Paylor, I., & Mitchell, P. (1993). Partnerships between the Independent Sector and the Probation Service. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 32(1), 25-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2311.1993.tb00757.x

Vancouver

Smith D, Paylor I, Mitchell P. Partnerships between the Independent Sector and the Probation Service. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice. 1993 Feb;32(1):25-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2311.1993.tb00757.x

Author

Smith, David ; Paylor, Ian ; Mitchell, Peter. / Partnerships between the Independent Sector and the Probation Service. In: The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice. 1993 ; Vol. 32, No. 1. pp. 25-38.

Bibtex

@article{e0747ca385fa4f0abc560b53077675d7,
title = "Partnerships between the Independent Sector and the Probation Service",
abstract = "This article examines the concept, strongly promoted in recent Home Office policy, of partnerships between the probation service and the independent sector. Its aim is to discuss the implications of this concept for probation policy and practice. It is argued first that current debates have tended to lose sight of a long tradition of joint work between the service and the voluntary sector, and examples are given of past partnerships' which may help inform present thinking. Five central issues are then identified - the divisibility of probation tasks, accountability, compatibility of aims, organisation, and funding. It is suggested that their resolution may depend upon enhanced local participation and co-operation in criminal justice.",
author = "David Smith and Ian Paylor and Peter Mitchell",
year = "1993",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-2311.1993.tb00757.x",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "25--38",
journal = "The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice",
issn = "0265-5527",
publisher = "Basil Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Partnerships between the Independent Sector and the Probation Service

AU - Smith, David

AU - Paylor, Ian

AU - Mitchell, Peter

PY - 1993/2

Y1 - 1993/2

N2 - This article examines the concept, strongly promoted in recent Home Office policy, of partnerships between the probation service and the independent sector. Its aim is to discuss the implications of this concept for probation policy and practice. It is argued first that current debates have tended to lose sight of a long tradition of joint work between the service and the voluntary sector, and examples are given of past partnerships' which may help inform present thinking. Five central issues are then identified - the divisibility of probation tasks, accountability, compatibility of aims, organisation, and funding. It is suggested that their resolution may depend upon enhanced local participation and co-operation in criminal justice.

AB - This article examines the concept, strongly promoted in recent Home Office policy, of partnerships between the probation service and the independent sector. Its aim is to discuss the implications of this concept for probation policy and practice. It is argued first that current debates have tended to lose sight of a long tradition of joint work between the service and the voluntary sector, and examples are given of past partnerships' which may help inform present thinking. Five central issues are then identified - the divisibility of probation tasks, accountability, compatibility of aims, organisation, and funding. It is suggested that their resolution may depend upon enhanced local participation and co-operation in criminal justice.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-2311.1993.tb00757.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-2311.1993.tb00757.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 32

SP - 25

EP - 38

JO - The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice

JF - The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice

SN - 0265-5527

IS - 1

ER -