Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Parts of speech systems as a basic typological ...

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Parts of speech systems as a basic typological parameter.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Parts of speech systems as a basic typological parameter. / Hengeveld, Kees; Rijkhoff, Jan; Siewierska, Anna.
In: Journal of Linguistics, Vol. 40, No. 3, 11.2004, p. 527-570.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Hengeveld, K, Rijkhoff, J & Siewierska, A 2004, 'Parts of speech systems as a basic typological parameter.', Journal of Linguistics, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 527-570. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226704002762

APA

Vancouver

Hengeveld K, Rijkhoff J, Siewierska A. Parts of speech systems as a basic typological parameter. Journal of Linguistics. 2004 Nov;40(3):527-570. doi: 10.1017/S0022226704002762

Author

Hengeveld, Kees ; Rijkhoff, Jan ; Siewierska, Anna. / Parts of speech systems as a basic typological parameter. In: Journal of Linguistics. 2004 ; Vol. 40, No. 3. pp. 527-570.

Bibtex

@article{76100ef5ba2c48558ab2cd5e4b9587d1,
title = "Parts of speech systems as a basic typological parameter.",
abstract = "This paper argues that the word order possibilities of a language are partly determined by the parts-of-speech system of that language. In languages in which lexical items are specialized for certain functionally defined syntactic slots (e.g. the modifier slot within a noun phrase), the identifiability of these slots is ensured by the nature of the lexical items (e.g. adjectives) themselves. As a result, word order possibilities are relatively unrestricted in these languages. In languages in which lexical items are not specialized for certain syntactic slots, in that these items combine the functions of two or more of the traditional word classes, other strategies have to be invoked to enhance identifiability. In these languages word order constraints are used to make syntactic slots identifiable on the basis of their position within the clause or phrase. Hence the word order possibilities are rather restricted in these languages. Counterexamples to the latter claim all involve cases in which identifiability is ensured by morphological rather than syntactic means. This shows that there is a balanced trade-off between the syntactic, morphological, and lexical structure of a language.",
author = "Kees Hengeveld and Jan Rijkhoff and Anna Siewierska",
note = "http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=LIN The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Journal of Linguistics, 40 (3), pp 527-570 2004, {\textcopyright} 2004 Cambridge University Press.",
year = "2004",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1017/S0022226704002762",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "527--570",
journal = "Journal of Linguistics",
issn = "0022-2267",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Parts of speech systems as a basic typological parameter.

AU - Hengeveld, Kees

AU - Rijkhoff, Jan

AU - Siewierska, Anna

N1 - http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=LIN The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Journal of Linguistics, 40 (3), pp 527-570 2004, © 2004 Cambridge University Press.

PY - 2004/11

Y1 - 2004/11

N2 - This paper argues that the word order possibilities of a language are partly determined by the parts-of-speech system of that language. In languages in which lexical items are specialized for certain functionally defined syntactic slots (e.g. the modifier slot within a noun phrase), the identifiability of these slots is ensured by the nature of the lexical items (e.g. adjectives) themselves. As a result, word order possibilities are relatively unrestricted in these languages. In languages in which lexical items are not specialized for certain syntactic slots, in that these items combine the functions of two or more of the traditional word classes, other strategies have to be invoked to enhance identifiability. In these languages word order constraints are used to make syntactic slots identifiable on the basis of their position within the clause or phrase. Hence the word order possibilities are rather restricted in these languages. Counterexamples to the latter claim all involve cases in which identifiability is ensured by morphological rather than syntactic means. This shows that there is a balanced trade-off between the syntactic, morphological, and lexical structure of a language.

AB - This paper argues that the word order possibilities of a language are partly determined by the parts-of-speech system of that language. In languages in which lexical items are specialized for certain functionally defined syntactic slots (e.g. the modifier slot within a noun phrase), the identifiability of these slots is ensured by the nature of the lexical items (e.g. adjectives) themselves. As a result, word order possibilities are relatively unrestricted in these languages. In languages in which lexical items are not specialized for certain syntactic slots, in that these items combine the functions of two or more of the traditional word classes, other strategies have to be invoked to enhance identifiability. In these languages word order constraints are used to make syntactic slots identifiable on the basis of their position within the clause or phrase. Hence the word order possibilities are rather restricted in these languages. Counterexamples to the latter claim all involve cases in which identifiability is ensured by morphological rather than syntactic means. This shows that there is a balanced trade-off between the syntactic, morphological, and lexical structure of a language.

U2 - 10.1017/S0022226704002762

DO - 10.1017/S0022226704002762

M3 - Journal article

VL - 40

SP - 527

EP - 570

JO - Journal of Linguistics

JF - Journal of Linguistics

SN - 0022-2267

IS - 3

ER -