Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Pathways to social well‐being of children with ...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Pathways to social well‐being of children with intellectual disability: testing the Family Investment Model

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Pathways to social well‐being of children with intellectual disability: testing the Family Investment Model. / Totsika, V.; Hastings, R. P.; Hatton, C. et al.
In: Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, Vol. 67, No. 12, 08.11.2023, p. 1354-1366.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Totsika, V, Hastings, RP, Hatton, C & Emerson, E 2023, 'Pathways to social well‐being of children with intellectual disability: testing the Family Investment Model', Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, vol. 67, no. 12, pp. 1354-1366. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.13082

APA

Vancouver

Totsika V, Hastings RP, Hatton C, Emerson E. Pathways to social well‐being of children with intellectual disability: testing the Family Investment Model. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. 2023 Nov 8;67(12):1354-1366. Epub 2023 Aug 30. doi: 10.1111/jir.13082

Author

Totsika, V. ; Hastings, R. P. ; Hatton, C. et al. / Pathways to social well‐being of children with intellectual disability : testing the Family Investment Model. In: Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. 2023 ; Vol. 67, No. 12. pp. 1354-1366.

Bibtex

@article{b1225a000ef44292b62f5737a215c9c5,
title = "Pathways to social well‐being of children with intellectual disability: testing the Family Investment Model",
abstract = "Background: Social well‐being, including prosocial and peer relationship skills, independence and co‐operation, is a particularly important developmental outcome in intellectual disability (ID). The present study investigated pathways to social well‐being through the early years' family environment, particularly the role of parental investments in mediating the path from family poverty to child social well‐being. Methods: In line with the Family Investment Model (FIM), we tested whether parental investments between 3 and 5 years of age mediate the impact of family poverty at 9 months of age on children's social well‐being at 7 years. Structural equation models were fitted to data from 555 children with ID identified from a UK population‐based cohort. Results: Findings indicated that home learning investments and the structural home environment (though not play) significantly mediated the effect of family poverty on children's social skills, albeit in different directions. While all parental investments reduced in the presence of poverty, the home learning environment appeared to promote social well‐being, whereas the structural home environment did not. Sensitivity analyses controlling for co‐occurring autism confirmed the pattern of findings. Child gender, ethnicity and parental educational qualifications did not moderate the mediational relationships, suggesting that FIM pathways to social well‐being were relevant to all families. Conclusions: The FIM provides a helpful framework to map developmental pathways for children with an ID. Parental investments related to home learning, the structural home environment and play are reduced in the presence of poverty although their impact on child social well‐being appears to differ.",
keywords = "social skills, Family Investment Model, intellectual disability, play, home environment, home learning",
author = "V. Totsika and Hastings, {R. P.} and C. Hatton and E. Emerson",
year = "2023",
month = nov,
day = "8",
doi = "10.1111/jir.13082",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "1354--1366",
journal = "Journal of Intellectual Disability Research",
issn = "0964-2633",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pathways to social well‐being of children with intellectual disability

T2 - testing the Family Investment Model

AU - Totsika, V.

AU - Hastings, R. P.

AU - Hatton, C.

AU - Emerson, E.

PY - 2023/11/8

Y1 - 2023/11/8

N2 - Background: Social well‐being, including prosocial and peer relationship skills, independence and co‐operation, is a particularly important developmental outcome in intellectual disability (ID). The present study investigated pathways to social well‐being through the early years' family environment, particularly the role of parental investments in mediating the path from family poverty to child social well‐being. Methods: In line with the Family Investment Model (FIM), we tested whether parental investments between 3 and 5 years of age mediate the impact of family poverty at 9 months of age on children's social well‐being at 7 years. Structural equation models were fitted to data from 555 children with ID identified from a UK population‐based cohort. Results: Findings indicated that home learning investments and the structural home environment (though not play) significantly mediated the effect of family poverty on children's social skills, albeit in different directions. While all parental investments reduced in the presence of poverty, the home learning environment appeared to promote social well‐being, whereas the structural home environment did not. Sensitivity analyses controlling for co‐occurring autism confirmed the pattern of findings. Child gender, ethnicity and parental educational qualifications did not moderate the mediational relationships, suggesting that FIM pathways to social well‐being were relevant to all families. Conclusions: The FIM provides a helpful framework to map developmental pathways for children with an ID. Parental investments related to home learning, the structural home environment and play are reduced in the presence of poverty although their impact on child social well‐being appears to differ.

AB - Background: Social well‐being, including prosocial and peer relationship skills, independence and co‐operation, is a particularly important developmental outcome in intellectual disability (ID). The present study investigated pathways to social well‐being through the early years' family environment, particularly the role of parental investments in mediating the path from family poverty to child social well‐being. Methods: In line with the Family Investment Model (FIM), we tested whether parental investments between 3 and 5 years of age mediate the impact of family poverty at 9 months of age on children's social well‐being at 7 years. Structural equation models were fitted to data from 555 children with ID identified from a UK population‐based cohort. Results: Findings indicated that home learning investments and the structural home environment (though not play) significantly mediated the effect of family poverty on children's social skills, albeit in different directions. While all parental investments reduced in the presence of poverty, the home learning environment appeared to promote social well‐being, whereas the structural home environment did not. Sensitivity analyses controlling for co‐occurring autism confirmed the pattern of findings. Child gender, ethnicity and parental educational qualifications did not moderate the mediational relationships, suggesting that FIM pathways to social well‐being were relevant to all families. Conclusions: The FIM provides a helpful framework to map developmental pathways for children with an ID. Parental investments related to home learning, the structural home environment and play are reduced in the presence of poverty although their impact on child social well‐being appears to differ.

KW - social skills

KW - Family Investment Model

KW - intellectual disability

KW - play

KW - home environment

KW - home learning

U2 - 10.1111/jir.13082

DO - 10.1111/jir.13082

M3 - Journal article

VL - 67

SP - 1354

EP - 1366

JO - Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

JF - Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

SN - 0964-2633

IS - 12

ER -