Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Patterns in distribution, abundance and body si...
View graph of relations

Patterns in distribution, abundance and body size of carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Caraboidea) in relation to dispersal ability

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Patterns in distribution, abundance and body size of carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Caraboidea) in relation to dispersal ability. / Gutierrez, D.; Menendez Martinez, Maria Rosa.
In: Journal of Biogeography, Vol. 24, No. 6, 12.1997, p. 903-914.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Gutierrez D, Menendez Martinez MR. Patterns in distribution, abundance and body size of carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Caraboidea) in relation to dispersal ability. Journal of Biogeography. 1997 Dec;24(6):903-914. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2699.1997.00144.x

Author

Bibtex

@article{9f2df9a9a3b640829282a1e48e234be3,
title = "Patterns in distribution, abundance and body size of carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Caraboidea) in relation to dispersal ability",
abstract = "The effects of dispersal ability, measured as two wing size categories (brachypterous vs. macropterous), on the distribution, abundance and body size, and on the relationships between these variables were examined in eighty-four species of carabid beetles over twenty-two sites in the northern Iberian peninsula. Geographic ranges of species (restricted to the northern Iberian peninsula vs. widespread—European or wider range) were also taken into account in the analyses because macropterous species significantly tended to exhibit wider geographic ranges than did brachypterous species. Regional distributions were wider in brachypterous-restricted and brachypterous-widespread species than in macropterous-widespread species. The three groups did not differ in abundance. Differences in regional distributions between groups may be explained by referring to a trade-off between dispersal ability and establishment ability indicated in the literature. Macropterous species would occupy relatively few sites due to a high frequency of unsuccessful colonizations. The relationships between regional distribution and abundance were positive for all the three groups, brachypterous-restricted, brachypterous-widespread and macropterous-widespread species. The regression line for the last group showed a lower elevation than those for brachypterous-restricted and brachypterous-widespread species. This fact was probably due to differences in regional distributions between groups. No relationship between abundance and body size was significant. Regressions of regional distribution on body size were positive in brachypterous-restricted and brachypterous-widespread carabids, but the relationship was not significant in macropterous-widespread carabids. These results were interpreted in terms of differences in body size–dependency of travelling velocities between flying and running carabids.",
keywords = "Abundance, body size, carabid beetles, dispersal ability, geographic range, regional distribution, northern Spain",
author = "D. Gutierrez and {Menendez Martinez}, {Maria Rosa}",
year = "1997",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1046/j.1365-2699.1997.00144.x",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "903--914",
journal = "Journal of Biogeography",
issn = "0305-0270",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patterns in distribution, abundance and body size of carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Caraboidea) in relation to dispersal ability

AU - Gutierrez, D.

AU - Menendez Martinez, Maria Rosa

PY - 1997/12

Y1 - 1997/12

N2 - The effects of dispersal ability, measured as two wing size categories (brachypterous vs. macropterous), on the distribution, abundance and body size, and on the relationships between these variables were examined in eighty-four species of carabid beetles over twenty-two sites in the northern Iberian peninsula. Geographic ranges of species (restricted to the northern Iberian peninsula vs. widespread—European or wider range) were also taken into account in the analyses because macropterous species significantly tended to exhibit wider geographic ranges than did brachypterous species. Regional distributions were wider in brachypterous-restricted and brachypterous-widespread species than in macropterous-widespread species. The three groups did not differ in abundance. Differences in regional distributions between groups may be explained by referring to a trade-off between dispersal ability and establishment ability indicated in the literature. Macropterous species would occupy relatively few sites due to a high frequency of unsuccessful colonizations. The relationships between regional distribution and abundance were positive for all the three groups, brachypterous-restricted, brachypterous-widespread and macropterous-widespread species. The regression line for the last group showed a lower elevation than those for brachypterous-restricted and brachypterous-widespread species. This fact was probably due to differences in regional distributions between groups. No relationship between abundance and body size was significant. Regressions of regional distribution on body size were positive in brachypterous-restricted and brachypterous-widespread carabids, but the relationship was not significant in macropterous-widespread carabids. These results were interpreted in terms of differences in body size–dependency of travelling velocities between flying and running carabids.

AB - The effects of dispersal ability, measured as two wing size categories (brachypterous vs. macropterous), on the distribution, abundance and body size, and on the relationships between these variables were examined in eighty-four species of carabid beetles over twenty-two sites in the northern Iberian peninsula. Geographic ranges of species (restricted to the northern Iberian peninsula vs. widespread—European or wider range) were also taken into account in the analyses because macropterous species significantly tended to exhibit wider geographic ranges than did brachypterous species. Regional distributions were wider in brachypterous-restricted and brachypterous-widespread species than in macropterous-widespread species. The three groups did not differ in abundance. Differences in regional distributions between groups may be explained by referring to a trade-off between dispersal ability and establishment ability indicated in the literature. Macropterous species would occupy relatively few sites due to a high frequency of unsuccessful colonizations. The relationships between regional distribution and abundance were positive for all the three groups, brachypterous-restricted, brachypterous-widespread and macropterous-widespread species. The regression line for the last group showed a lower elevation than those for brachypterous-restricted and brachypterous-widespread species. This fact was probably due to differences in regional distributions between groups. No relationship between abundance and body size was significant. Regressions of regional distribution on body size were positive in brachypterous-restricted and brachypterous-widespread carabids, but the relationship was not significant in macropterous-widespread carabids. These results were interpreted in terms of differences in body size–dependency of travelling velocities between flying and running carabids.

KW - Abundance

KW - body size

KW - carabid beetles

KW - dispersal ability

KW - geographic range

KW - regional distribution

KW - northern Spain

U2 - 10.1046/j.1365-2699.1997.00144.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1365-2699.1997.00144.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 24

SP - 903

EP - 914

JO - Journal of Biogeography

JF - Journal of Biogeography

SN - 0305-0270

IS - 6

ER -