Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > ‘People don’t like the ultra-poor like me'

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

‘People don’t like the ultra-poor like me': an intersectional approach to gender and participation in urban water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) projects in Dhaka’s bostis

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

‘People don’t like the ultra-poor like me': an intersectional approach to gender and participation in urban water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) projects in Dhaka’s bostis. / Cawood, Sally; Rabby, Md. Fazle.
In: International Development Planning Review, Vol. 44, No. 2, 30.06.2022, p. 147-168.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Cawood S, Rabby MF. ‘People don’t like the ultra-poor like me': an intersectional approach to gender and participation in urban water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) projects in Dhaka’s bostis. International Development Planning Review. 2022 Jun 30;44(2):147-168. Epub 2021 Jan 1. doi: 10.3828/idpr.2021.7

Author

Bibtex

@article{81703951a8834f41bc3bd5bc227704f1,
title = "{\textquoteleft}People don{\textquoteright}t like the ultra-poor like me': an intersectional approach to gender and participation in urban water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) projects in Dhaka{\textquoteright}s bostis",
abstract = "In this paper we use an anti, intra and inter-categorical intersectional approach, and ethnographic enquiry in Dhaka, Bangladesh, to nuance debate over gender and participation in urban water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) projects in low-income settlements. We make three claims. First, that a mismatch exists between how {\textquoteleft}women{\textquoteright} are framed and targeted in WASH projects and everyday experience characterised by the unequal distribution of benefits and burdens. Second, the likelihood of participation and leadership in WASH projects differs between women according, especially, to age, income, marital and occupancy status, social and political relationships. Third, the same interconnected leaders - including married {\textquoteleft}power couples{\textquoteright} - are involved in all development projects, with implications for the consolidation of power and authority. We call for urban development research, policy and practice to better engage with difference and the conflicting roles certain women and men play in NGO management, local politics and broader claim-making.",
keywords = "intersectionality, gender, community based organisations (CBOs), urban, water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH), Bangladesh",
author = "Sally Cawood and Rabby, {Md. Fazle}",
year = "2022",
month = jun,
day = "30",
doi = "10.3828/idpr.2021.7",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "147--168",
journal = "International Development Planning Review",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘People don’t like the ultra-poor like me'

T2 - an intersectional approach to gender and participation in urban water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) projects in Dhaka’s bostis

AU - Cawood, Sally

AU - Rabby, Md. Fazle

PY - 2022/6/30

Y1 - 2022/6/30

N2 - In this paper we use an anti, intra and inter-categorical intersectional approach, and ethnographic enquiry in Dhaka, Bangladesh, to nuance debate over gender and participation in urban water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) projects in low-income settlements. We make three claims. First, that a mismatch exists between how ‘women’ are framed and targeted in WASH projects and everyday experience characterised by the unequal distribution of benefits and burdens. Second, the likelihood of participation and leadership in WASH projects differs between women according, especially, to age, income, marital and occupancy status, social and political relationships. Third, the same interconnected leaders - including married ‘power couples’ - are involved in all development projects, with implications for the consolidation of power and authority. We call for urban development research, policy and practice to better engage with difference and the conflicting roles certain women and men play in NGO management, local politics and broader claim-making.

AB - In this paper we use an anti, intra and inter-categorical intersectional approach, and ethnographic enquiry in Dhaka, Bangladesh, to nuance debate over gender and participation in urban water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) projects in low-income settlements. We make three claims. First, that a mismatch exists between how ‘women’ are framed and targeted in WASH projects and everyday experience characterised by the unequal distribution of benefits and burdens. Second, the likelihood of participation and leadership in WASH projects differs between women according, especially, to age, income, marital and occupancy status, social and political relationships. Third, the same interconnected leaders - including married ‘power couples’ - are involved in all development projects, with implications for the consolidation of power and authority. We call for urban development research, policy and practice to better engage with difference and the conflicting roles certain women and men play in NGO management, local politics and broader claim-making.

KW - intersectionality

KW - gender

KW - community based organisations (CBOs)

KW - urban

KW - water

KW - sanitation and hygiene (WASH)

KW - Bangladesh

U2 - 10.3828/idpr.2021.7

DO - 10.3828/idpr.2021.7

M3 - Journal article

VL - 44

SP - 147

EP - 168

JO - International Development Planning Review

JF - International Development Planning Review

IS - 2

ER -