Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Personalisation policy in the lives of people w...

Electronic data

  • untitled

    Final published version, 166 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Personalisation policy in the lives of people with learning disabilities: a call to focus on how people build their lives relationally

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

E-pub ahead of print
  • A. Power
  • A. Coverdale
  • A. Croydon
  • E. Hall
  • A. Kaley
  • H. Macpherson
  • M. Nind
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>25/03/2021
<mark>Journal</mark>Critical Social Policy
Publication StatusE-pub ahead of print
Early online date25/03/21
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Social care provision across high-income countries has been transformed over the last ten years by personalisation – a policy agenda to give people with eligible support needs more choice and control over their support. Yet the ideological underpinnings of this transformation remain highly mutable, particularly in the context of reduced welfare provision that has unfolded in many nations advancing personalisation. How the policy has manifested itself has led to an expectation for people to self-build a life as individual consumers within a care market. This article draws on a study exploring how people with learning disabilities in England and Scotland are responding to the everyday realities of personalisation as it is enacted where they live and show the relationality inherent in their practices. We propose that the personalisation agenda as it currently stands (as an individualising movement involving an increasing responsibilisation of individuals and their families) ignores the inherently relational nature of care and support. We propose that social care policy needs to recognise the relational ways in which people build their lives and to advocate a redistribution of responsibility to reduce inequalities in the allocation of care.