Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research. / Synergize Consortium.
In: Current biology : CB, Vol. 33, No. 16, 21.08.2023, p. 3495-3504.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Synergize Consortium 2023, 'Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research', Current biology : CB, vol. 33, no. 16, pp. 3495-3504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2023.06.077

APA

Synergize Consortium (2023). Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research. Current biology : CB, 33(16), 3495-3504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2023.06.077

Vancouver

Synergize Consortium. Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research. Current biology : CB. 2023 Aug 21;33(16):3495-3504. Epub 2023 Jul 19. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.06.077

Author

Synergize Consortium. / Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research. In: Current biology : CB. 2023 ; Vol. 33, No. 16. pp. 3495-3504.

Bibtex

@article{266bf55b19764fd384a177bb45583efa,
title = "Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research",
abstract = "Biodiversity loss is one of the main challenges of our time, and attempts to address it require a clear understanding of how ecological communities respond to environmental change across time and space. While the increasing availability of global databases on ecological communities has advanced our knowledge of biodiversity sensitivity to environmental changes, vast areas of the tropics remain understudied. In the American tropics, Amazonia stands out as the world's most diverse rainforest and the primary source of Neotropical biodiversity, but it remains among the least known forests in America and is often underrepresented in biodiversity databases. To worsen this situation, human-induced modifications may eliminate pieces of the Amazon's biodiversity puzzle before we can use them to understand how ecological communities are responding. To increase generalization and applicability of biodiversity knowledge, it is thus crucial to reduce biases in ecological research, particularly in regions projected to face the most pronounced environmental changes. We integrate ecological community metadata of 7,694 sampling sites for multiple organism groups in a machine learning model framework to map the research probability across the Brazilian Amazonia, while identifying the region's vulnerability to environmental change. 15%-18% of the most neglected areas in ecological research are expected to experience severe climate or land use changes by 2050. This means that unless we take immediate action, we will not be able to establish their current status, much less monitor how it is changing and what is being lost.",
keywords = "spatial bias, knowledge gap, conservation science, biological diversity, community assessment, Brazil, biodiversity, information deficits",
author = "{Synergize Consortium} and Carvalho, {Raquel L} and Resende, {Angelica F} and Jos Barlow and Fran{\c c}a, {Filipe M} and Moura, {Mario R} and Rafaella Maciel and Fernanda Alves-Martins and Jack Shutt and Nunes, {Cassio A} and Fernando Elias and Silveira, {Juliana M} and Lis Stegmann and Baccaro, {Fabricio B} and Leandro Juen and Juliana Schietti and Luiz Arag{\~a}o and Erika Berenguer and Leandro Castello and Costa, {Flavia R C} and Guedes, {Matheus L} and Leal, {Cecilia G} and Lees, {Alexander C} and Victoria Isaac and Nascimento, {Rodrigo O} and Phillips, {Oliver L} and Schmidt, {Fernando Augusto} and {Ter Steege}, Hans and Fernando Vaz-de-Mello and Venticinque, {Eduardo M} and Vieira, {Ima C{\'e}lia Guimar{\~a}es} and Jansen Zuanon and Joice Ferreira",
year = "2023",
month = aug,
day = "21",
doi = "10.1016/j.cub.2023.06.077",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "3495--3504",
journal = "Current biology : CB",
issn = "0960-9822",
publisher = "CELL PRESS",
number = "16",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research

AU - Synergize Consortium

AU - Carvalho, Raquel L

AU - Resende, Angelica F

AU - Barlow, Jos

AU - França, Filipe M

AU - Moura, Mario R

AU - Maciel, Rafaella

AU - Alves-Martins, Fernanda

AU - Shutt, Jack

AU - Nunes, Cassio A

AU - Elias, Fernando

AU - Silveira, Juliana M

AU - Stegmann, Lis

AU - Baccaro, Fabricio B

AU - Juen, Leandro

AU - Schietti, Juliana

AU - Aragão, Luiz

AU - Berenguer, Erika

AU - Castello, Leandro

AU - Costa, Flavia R C

AU - Guedes, Matheus L

AU - Leal, Cecilia G

AU - Lees, Alexander C

AU - Isaac, Victoria

AU - Nascimento, Rodrigo O

AU - Phillips, Oliver L

AU - Schmidt, Fernando Augusto

AU - Ter Steege, Hans

AU - Vaz-de-Mello, Fernando

AU - Venticinque, Eduardo M

AU - Vieira, Ima Célia Guimarães

AU - Zuanon, Jansen

AU - Ferreira, Joice

PY - 2023/8/21

Y1 - 2023/8/21

N2 - Biodiversity loss is one of the main challenges of our time, and attempts to address it require a clear understanding of how ecological communities respond to environmental change across time and space. While the increasing availability of global databases on ecological communities has advanced our knowledge of biodiversity sensitivity to environmental changes, vast areas of the tropics remain understudied. In the American tropics, Amazonia stands out as the world's most diverse rainforest and the primary source of Neotropical biodiversity, but it remains among the least known forests in America and is often underrepresented in biodiversity databases. To worsen this situation, human-induced modifications may eliminate pieces of the Amazon's biodiversity puzzle before we can use them to understand how ecological communities are responding. To increase generalization and applicability of biodiversity knowledge, it is thus crucial to reduce biases in ecological research, particularly in regions projected to face the most pronounced environmental changes. We integrate ecological community metadata of 7,694 sampling sites for multiple organism groups in a machine learning model framework to map the research probability across the Brazilian Amazonia, while identifying the region's vulnerability to environmental change. 15%-18% of the most neglected areas in ecological research are expected to experience severe climate or land use changes by 2050. This means that unless we take immediate action, we will not be able to establish their current status, much less monitor how it is changing and what is being lost.

AB - Biodiversity loss is one of the main challenges of our time, and attempts to address it require a clear understanding of how ecological communities respond to environmental change across time and space. While the increasing availability of global databases on ecological communities has advanced our knowledge of biodiversity sensitivity to environmental changes, vast areas of the tropics remain understudied. In the American tropics, Amazonia stands out as the world's most diverse rainforest and the primary source of Neotropical biodiversity, but it remains among the least known forests in America and is often underrepresented in biodiversity databases. To worsen this situation, human-induced modifications may eliminate pieces of the Amazon's biodiversity puzzle before we can use them to understand how ecological communities are responding. To increase generalization and applicability of biodiversity knowledge, it is thus crucial to reduce biases in ecological research, particularly in regions projected to face the most pronounced environmental changes. We integrate ecological community metadata of 7,694 sampling sites for multiple organism groups in a machine learning model framework to map the research probability across the Brazilian Amazonia, while identifying the region's vulnerability to environmental change. 15%-18% of the most neglected areas in ecological research are expected to experience severe climate or land use changes by 2050. This means that unless we take immediate action, we will not be able to establish their current status, much less monitor how it is changing and what is being lost.

KW - spatial bias

KW - knowledge gap

KW - conservation science

KW - biological diversity

KW - community assessment

KW - Brazil

KW - biodiversity

KW - information deficits

U2 - 10.1016/j.cub.2023.06.077

DO - 10.1016/j.cub.2023.06.077

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 37473761

VL - 33

SP - 3495

EP - 3504

JO - Current biology : CB

JF - Current biology : CB

SN - 0960-9822

IS - 16

ER -