Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Philosophy and the Machine

Electronic data

  • PPC_1.2_Bradley

    Accepted author manuscript, 324 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Philosophy and the Machine: Slavery in French Philosophy of Technology 1897-1948

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Philosophy and the Machine: Slavery in French Philosophy of Technology 1897-1948. / Bradley, Arthur.
In: Politics, Philosophy and Critique, Vol. 1, No. 2, 31.07.2024, p. 219-236.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bradley A. Philosophy and the Machine: Slavery in French Philosophy of Technology 1897-1948. Politics, Philosophy and Critique. 2024 Jul 31;1(2):219-236. doi: 10.3366/ppc.2024.0044

Author

Bradley, Arthur. / Philosophy and the Machine : Slavery in French Philosophy of Technology 1897-1948. In: Politics, Philosophy and Critique. 2024 ; Vol. 1, No. 2. pp. 219-236.

Bibtex

@article{a085bd4e82084253b23451d1b88793bb,
title = "Philosophy and the Machine: Slavery in French Philosophy of Technology 1897-1948",
abstract = "This essay reconstructs a now largely obscure fifty year debate within French philosophy of technology from Alfred Espinas to Alexandre Koj{\`e}ve about slavery in the ancient world. To summarize, I argue that early twentieth century French philosophy of technology{\textquoteright}s hypothesis that Greek and Roman slavery caused a blocage – a block, delay or stagnation – in the development of technology in antiquity may well seem little more than a historical curiosity today, but that its hypothesis of a constitutive relation between slave labour and technological innovation has recently re-emerged in biopolitical form in such texts as Giorgio Agamben{\textquoteright}s The Use of Bodies (2015). In the confrontation between what Alexandre Koyr{\'e} famously calls the {\textquoteleft}philosophers{\textquoteright} and the {\textquoteleft}machine{\textquoteright}, I argue that we not only enter a largely forgotten conceptual archive for modern French philosophy of technology (Gilbert Simondon, Andr{\'e} Leroi-Gouhran, Bernard Stiegler) but for contemporary biopolitical theory (Giorgio Agamben).",
author = "Arthur Bradley",
year = "2024",
month = jul,
day = "31",
doi = "10.3366/ppc.2024.0044",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "219--236",
journal = "Politics, Philosophy and Critique",
publisher = "University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Philosophy and the Machine

T2 - Slavery in French Philosophy of Technology 1897-1948

AU - Bradley, Arthur

PY - 2024/7/31

Y1 - 2024/7/31

N2 - This essay reconstructs a now largely obscure fifty year debate within French philosophy of technology from Alfred Espinas to Alexandre Kojève about slavery in the ancient world. To summarize, I argue that early twentieth century French philosophy of technology’s hypothesis that Greek and Roman slavery caused a blocage – a block, delay or stagnation – in the development of technology in antiquity may well seem little more than a historical curiosity today, but that its hypothesis of a constitutive relation between slave labour and technological innovation has recently re-emerged in biopolitical form in such texts as Giorgio Agamben’s The Use of Bodies (2015). In the confrontation between what Alexandre Koyré famously calls the ‘philosophers’ and the ‘machine’, I argue that we not only enter a largely forgotten conceptual archive for modern French philosophy of technology (Gilbert Simondon, André Leroi-Gouhran, Bernard Stiegler) but for contemporary biopolitical theory (Giorgio Agamben).

AB - This essay reconstructs a now largely obscure fifty year debate within French philosophy of technology from Alfred Espinas to Alexandre Kojève about slavery in the ancient world. To summarize, I argue that early twentieth century French philosophy of technology’s hypothesis that Greek and Roman slavery caused a blocage – a block, delay or stagnation – in the development of technology in antiquity may well seem little more than a historical curiosity today, but that its hypothesis of a constitutive relation between slave labour and technological innovation has recently re-emerged in biopolitical form in such texts as Giorgio Agamben’s The Use of Bodies (2015). In the confrontation between what Alexandre Koyré famously calls the ‘philosophers’ and the ‘machine’, I argue that we not only enter a largely forgotten conceptual archive for modern French philosophy of technology (Gilbert Simondon, André Leroi-Gouhran, Bernard Stiegler) but for contemporary biopolitical theory (Giorgio Agamben).

U2 - 10.3366/ppc.2024.0044

DO - 10.3366/ppc.2024.0044

M3 - Journal article

VL - 1

SP - 219

EP - 236

JO - Politics, Philosophy and Critique

JF - Politics, Philosophy and Critique

IS - 2

ER -