Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Picking on immigrants

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Picking on immigrants: a cross-national analysis of individual-level relative deprivation and authoritarianism as predictors of anti-foreign prejudice

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Picking on immigrants: a cross-national analysis of individual-level relative deprivation and authoritarianism as predictors of anti-foreign prejudice. / Yoxon, Barbara; Van Hauwaert, Stephen; Kiess, Johannes.
In: Acta Politica, Vol. 54, 01.07.2019, p. 479-520.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Yoxon B, Van Hauwaert S, Kiess J. Picking on immigrants: a cross-national analysis of individual-level relative deprivation and authoritarianism as predictors of anti-foreign prejudice. Acta Politica. 2019 Jul 1;54:479-520. Epub 2017 Nov 1. doi: 10.1057/s41269-017-0067-8

Author

Bibtex

@article{d597feb84b2d4618b33b4fdfb3fa20a4,
title = "Picking on immigrants: a cross-national analysis of individual-level relative deprivation and authoritarianism as predictors of anti-foreign prejudice",
abstract = "In many European countries, anti-immigrant sentiments seem to have spread following recent economic challenges. By drawing on relative deprivation (RD) theory, we establish a theoretical connection between economic downturns and anti-immigrant prejudice. We argue that the experience of individual-level relative deprivation (IRD) is comparable to that of social threat and social exclusion. We draw on a large body of research that suggests the experience of social threat and uncertainty leads to the perception of the world in ethnocentric terms and rejecting pluralistic belief systems. Unlike much of the literature, we focus on individual-level perceptions and distinguish between an objective and subjective relative deprivation. Given our focus on individual-level predictors, we also test for the effects of authoritarian preferences on the likelihood of anti-immigrant bias. Our study demonstrates that unlike objective deprivation, both subjective deprivation and authoritarianism have a significant impact on anti-immigrant sentiments. Furthermore, we find evidence that one component of authoritarian preferences, namely authoritarian submission, moderates the effect of relative deprivation on economic (not cultural) forms of anti-immigrant prejudice.",
keywords = "Anti-immigrant, Prejudice, Relative deprivation, Authoritarianism, Fixed effects",
author = "Barbara Yoxon and {Van Hauwaert}, Stephen and Johannes Kiess",
year = "2019",
month = jul,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1057/s41269-017-0067-8",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "479--520",
journal = "Acta Politica",
issn = "0001-6810",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Picking on immigrants

T2 - a cross-national analysis of individual-level relative deprivation and authoritarianism as predictors of anti-foreign prejudice

AU - Yoxon, Barbara

AU - Van Hauwaert, Stephen

AU - Kiess, Johannes

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - In many European countries, anti-immigrant sentiments seem to have spread following recent economic challenges. By drawing on relative deprivation (RD) theory, we establish a theoretical connection between economic downturns and anti-immigrant prejudice. We argue that the experience of individual-level relative deprivation (IRD) is comparable to that of social threat and social exclusion. We draw on a large body of research that suggests the experience of social threat and uncertainty leads to the perception of the world in ethnocentric terms and rejecting pluralistic belief systems. Unlike much of the literature, we focus on individual-level perceptions and distinguish between an objective and subjective relative deprivation. Given our focus on individual-level predictors, we also test for the effects of authoritarian preferences on the likelihood of anti-immigrant bias. Our study demonstrates that unlike objective deprivation, both subjective deprivation and authoritarianism have a significant impact on anti-immigrant sentiments. Furthermore, we find evidence that one component of authoritarian preferences, namely authoritarian submission, moderates the effect of relative deprivation on economic (not cultural) forms of anti-immigrant prejudice.

AB - In many European countries, anti-immigrant sentiments seem to have spread following recent economic challenges. By drawing on relative deprivation (RD) theory, we establish a theoretical connection between economic downturns and anti-immigrant prejudice. We argue that the experience of individual-level relative deprivation (IRD) is comparable to that of social threat and social exclusion. We draw on a large body of research that suggests the experience of social threat and uncertainty leads to the perception of the world in ethnocentric terms and rejecting pluralistic belief systems. Unlike much of the literature, we focus on individual-level perceptions and distinguish between an objective and subjective relative deprivation. Given our focus on individual-level predictors, we also test for the effects of authoritarian preferences on the likelihood of anti-immigrant bias. Our study demonstrates that unlike objective deprivation, both subjective deprivation and authoritarianism have a significant impact on anti-immigrant sentiments. Furthermore, we find evidence that one component of authoritarian preferences, namely authoritarian submission, moderates the effect of relative deprivation on economic (not cultural) forms of anti-immigrant prejudice.

KW - Anti-immigrant

KW - Prejudice

KW - Relative deprivation

KW - Authoritarianism

KW - Fixed effects

U2 - 10.1057/s41269-017-0067-8

DO - 10.1057/s41269-017-0067-8

M3 - Journal article

VL - 54

SP - 479

EP - 520

JO - Acta Politica

JF - Acta Politica

SN - 0001-6810

ER -