Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Planning efficient 4D trajectories in Air Traff...

Electronic data

  • Planning_efficient_4D_trajectories_in_Air_Traffic_Flow_Management_

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in European Journal of Operational Research. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in European Journal of Operational Research, 276, 2, 2019 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.01.039

    Accepted author manuscript, 1.28 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Planning efficient 4D trajectories in Air Traffic Flow Management

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Planning efficient 4D trajectories in Air Traffic Flow Management. / Dal Sasso, Veronica; Djeumou Fomeni, Franklin; Lulli, Guglielmo et al.
In: European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 276, No. 2, 16.07.2019, p. 676-687.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Dal Sasso V, Djeumou Fomeni F, Lulli G, Zografos KG. Planning efficient 4D trajectories in Air Traffic Flow Management. European Journal of Operational Research. 2019 Jul 16;276(2):676-687. Epub 2019 Jan 19. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.01.039

Author

Dal Sasso, Veronica ; Djeumou Fomeni, Franklin ; Lulli, Guglielmo et al. / Planning efficient 4D trajectories in Air Traffic Flow Management. In: European Journal of Operational Research. 2019 ; Vol. 276, No. 2. pp. 676-687.

Bibtex

@article{a2958494243842ae8ed56f48d1392bed,
title = "Planning efficient 4D trajectories in Air Traffic Flow Management",
abstract = "In this paper, we focus on designing efficient 4D trajectories for the planning phase of Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM). A key feature of the proposed approach is the inclusion of stakeholders' preferences and priorities. In particular, we have implemented two priority mechanisms recently developed by Eurocontrol, namely the Fleet Delay Reordering and the Margins.For this purpose, we have customized a multi-objective binary program for the ATFM problem taking into account the specific assumptions required for the ATFM planning phase. To compute the Pareto frontier in a reasonable computational time, we have developed a simulated annealing algorithm. The algorithm has been tested on an instance resembling real world conditions using data extracted from the Eurocontrol data repository. This instance involves four major European airports and their air traffic in one of the busiest days of year 2016, and precisely, October 3rd. The simulated annealing algorithm has shown good computational performances and has provided a good approximation of the Pareto optimal frontier. The results have been validated using Eurocontrol tools and have demonstrated the viability of the proposed approach. Practitioners and stakeholders' representatives have provided positive feedback on the proposed modeling approach and on the inclusion of ATM stakeholders' preferences and priorities. ",
keywords = "Transportation, Air Traffic Flow Management, 4D trajectories optimization, Multi-objective heuristic, Multi-criteria decision making",
author = "{Dal Sasso}, Veronica and {Djeumou Fomeni}, Franklin and Guglielmo Lulli and Zografos, {Konstantinos G}",
note = "This is the author{\textquoteright}s version of a work that was accepted for publication in European Journal of Operational Research. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in European Journal of Operational Research, 276, 2, 2019 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.01.039",
year = "2019",
month = jul,
day = "16",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejor.2019.01.039",
language = "English",
volume = "276",
pages = "676--687",
journal = "European Journal of Operational Research",
issn = "0377-2217",
publisher = "Elsevier Science B.V.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Planning efficient 4D trajectories in Air Traffic Flow Management

AU - Dal Sasso, Veronica

AU - Djeumou Fomeni, Franklin

AU - Lulli, Guglielmo

AU - Zografos, Konstantinos G

N1 - This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in European Journal of Operational Research. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in European Journal of Operational Research, 276, 2, 2019 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.01.039

PY - 2019/7/16

Y1 - 2019/7/16

N2 - In this paper, we focus on designing efficient 4D trajectories for the planning phase of Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM). A key feature of the proposed approach is the inclusion of stakeholders' preferences and priorities. In particular, we have implemented two priority mechanisms recently developed by Eurocontrol, namely the Fleet Delay Reordering and the Margins.For this purpose, we have customized a multi-objective binary program for the ATFM problem taking into account the specific assumptions required for the ATFM planning phase. To compute the Pareto frontier in a reasonable computational time, we have developed a simulated annealing algorithm. The algorithm has been tested on an instance resembling real world conditions using data extracted from the Eurocontrol data repository. This instance involves four major European airports and their air traffic in one of the busiest days of year 2016, and precisely, October 3rd. The simulated annealing algorithm has shown good computational performances and has provided a good approximation of the Pareto optimal frontier. The results have been validated using Eurocontrol tools and have demonstrated the viability of the proposed approach. Practitioners and stakeholders' representatives have provided positive feedback on the proposed modeling approach and on the inclusion of ATM stakeholders' preferences and priorities.

AB - In this paper, we focus on designing efficient 4D trajectories for the planning phase of Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM). A key feature of the proposed approach is the inclusion of stakeholders' preferences and priorities. In particular, we have implemented two priority mechanisms recently developed by Eurocontrol, namely the Fleet Delay Reordering and the Margins.For this purpose, we have customized a multi-objective binary program for the ATFM problem taking into account the specific assumptions required for the ATFM planning phase. To compute the Pareto frontier in a reasonable computational time, we have developed a simulated annealing algorithm. The algorithm has been tested on an instance resembling real world conditions using data extracted from the Eurocontrol data repository. This instance involves four major European airports and their air traffic in one of the busiest days of year 2016, and precisely, October 3rd. The simulated annealing algorithm has shown good computational performances and has provided a good approximation of the Pareto optimal frontier. The results have been validated using Eurocontrol tools and have demonstrated the viability of the proposed approach. Practitioners and stakeholders' representatives have provided positive feedback on the proposed modeling approach and on the inclusion of ATM stakeholders' preferences and priorities.

KW - Transportation

KW - Air Traffic Flow Management

KW - 4D trajectories optimization

KW - Multi-objective heuristic

KW - Multi-criteria decision making

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.01.039

DO - 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.01.039

M3 - Journal article

VL - 276

SP - 676

EP - 687

JO - European Journal of Operational Research

JF - European Journal of Operational Research

SN - 0377-2217

IS - 2

ER -