Accepted author manuscript, 185 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Conference contribution/Paper › peer-review
Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Conference contribution/Paper › peer-review
}
TY - GEN
T1 - Playing Catch-Up
T2 - Evaluating Playback Speed Control in Low-Latency Live Streaming
AU - Liang, Yu
AU - Lyko, Tomasz
AU - Nilsson, Mike
AU - Farrow, Paul
AU - Appleby, Steve
AU - Broadbent, Matthew
AU - Race, Nicholas
PY - 2024/7/22
Y1 - 2024/7/22
N2 - The surge in popularity of live video streaming has spurred the development of various bitrate adaptation techniques, all aimed at enhancing user Quality of Experience (QoE). Compared to streaming Video-on-Demand, achieving low-latency live video streaming under fluctuating network conditions poses additional challenges. It requires finding the balance between rebuffering avoidance and latency, as a small client buffer is required to achieve low latency. Video players can also employ playback speed control to help optimize this balance. Specifically, when client buffer occupancy is high and hence latency is high, the player may increase playback speed to reduce the latency; and conversely, when client buffer occupancy is low and hence the risk of rebuffering is high, the player may reduce playback speed to increase buffer occupancy. Based on this rationale, a variety of playback speed control methods have been proposed. This paper evaluates, using a real-world testbed, the effectiveness of various playback speed control mechanisms when applied to a set of bitrate adaptation algorithms, with the evaluation also encompassing variations in target latency and network conditions. Our findings show a lack of coordination between adaptive bitrate (ABR) algorithms and playback speed control mechanisms. This leads us to conclude that there is a need for new playback speed control methods designed in conjunction with ABR algorithms.
AB - The surge in popularity of live video streaming has spurred the development of various bitrate adaptation techniques, all aimed at enhancing user Quality of Experience (QoE). Compared to streaming Video-on-Demand, achieving low-latency live video streaming under fluctuating network conditions poses additional challenges. It requires finding the balance between rebuffering avoidance and latency, as a small client buffer is required to achieve low latency. Video players can also employ playback speed control to help optimize this balance. Specifically, when client buffer occupancy is high and hence latency is high, the player may increase playback speed to reduce the latency; and conversely, when client buffer occupancy is low and hence the risk of rebuffering is high, the player may reduce playback speed to increase buffer occupancy. Based on this rationale, a variety of playback speed control methods have been proposed. This paper evaluates, using a real-world testbed, the effectiveness of various playback speed control mechanisms when applied to a set of bitrate adaptation algorithms, with the evaluation also encompassing variations in target latency and network conditions. Our findings show a lack of coordination between adaptive bitrate (ABR) algorithms and playback speed control mechanisms. This leads us to conclude that there is a need for new playback speed control methods designed in conjunction with ABR algorithms.
U2 - 10.1109/QoMEX61742.2024.10598290
DO - 10.1109/QoMEX61742.2024.10598290
M3 - Conference contribution/Paper
SN - 9798350361599
BT - 2024 16th International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)
PB - IEEE
ER -