Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Pluralism and incommensurability in suicide res...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Pluralism and incommensurability in suicide research

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Pluralism and incommensurability in suicide research. / Maung, Hane.
In: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C :Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Vol. 80, 101247, 30.04.2020.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Maung, H 2020, 'Pluralism and incommensurability in suicide research', Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C :Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, vol. 80, 101247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2019.101247

APA

Maung, H. (2020). Pluralism and incommensurability in suicide research. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C :Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 80, Article 101247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2019.101247

Vancouver

Maung H. Pluralism and incommensurability in suicide research. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C :Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. 2020 Apr 30;80:101247. Epub 2020 Apr 8. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2019.101247

Author

Maung, Hane. / Pluralism and incommensurability in suicide research. In: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C :Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. 2020 ; Vol. 80.

Bibtex

@article{62a3a1a53ac64c25947aed73a7fe36d3,
title = "Pluralism and incommensurability in suicide research",
abstract = "This paper examines the complex research landscape of contemporary suicidology from a philosophy of science perspective. I begin by unpacking the methods, concepts, and assumptions of some of the prominent approaches to studying suicide causation, including psychological autopsy studies, epidemiological studies, biological studies, and qualitative studies. I then analyze the different ways these approaches partition the causes of suicide, with particular emphasis on the ways they conceptualize the domain of mental disorder. I argue that these different ways of partitioning the causal space and conceptualizing mental disorder result in incommensurabilities between the approaches. These incommensurabilities restrict the degrees to which the different approaches can be integrated, thus lending support to explanatory pluralism in the study of suicide causation. They also shed light on some of the philosophical underpinnings of the disagreement between mainstream suicidology and the emerging area of critical suicidology.",
keywords = "Suicidology, Mental disorder, Causal space, Explanatory pluralism, Incommensurability",
author = "Hane Maung",
year = "2020",
month = apr,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1016/j.shpsc.2019.101247",
language = "English",
volume = "80",
journal = "Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C :Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pluralism and incommensurability in suicide research

AU - Maung, Hane

PY - 2020/4/30

Y1 - 2020/4/30

N2 - This paper examines the complex research landscape of contemporary suicidology from a philosophy of science perspective. I begin by unpacking the methods, concepts, and assumptions of some of the prominent approaches to studying suicide causation, including psychological autopsy studies, epidemiological studies, biological studies, and qualitative studies. I then analyze the different ways these approaches partition the causes of suicide, with particular emphasis on the ways they conceptualize the domain of mental disorder. I argue that these different ways of partitioning the causal space and conceptualizing mental disorder result in incommensurabilities between the approaches. These incommensurabilities restrict the degrees to which the different approaches can be integrated, thus lending support to explanatory pluralism in the study of suicide causation. They also shed light on some of the philosophical underpinnings of the disagreement between mainstream suicidology and the emerging area of critical suicidology.

AB - This paper examines the complex research landscape of contemporary suicidology from a philosophy of science perspective. I begin by unpacking the methods, concepts, and assumptions of some of the prominent approaches to studying suicide causation, including psychological autopsy studies, epidemiological studies, biological studies, and qualitative studies. I then analyze the different ways these approaches partition the causes of suicide, with particular emphasis on the ways they conceptualize the domain of mental disorder. I argue that these different ways of partitioning the causal space and conceptualizing mental disorder result in incommensurabilities between the approaches. These incommensurabilities restrict the degrees to which the different approaches can be integrated, thus lending support to explanatory pluralism in the study of suicide causation. They also shed light on some of the philosophical underpinnings of the disagreement between mainstream suicidology and the emerging area of critical suicidology.

KW - Suicidology

KW - Mental disorder

KW - Causal space

KW - Explanatory pluralism

KW - Incommensurability

UR - https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/pluralism-and-incommensurability-in-suicide-research(fd9c509d-c65d-422d-abc8-0d57ed36446b).html

U2 - 10.1016/j.shpsc.2019.101247

DO - 10.1016/j.shpsc.2019.101247

M3 - Journal article

VL - 80

JO - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C :Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences

JF - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C :Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences

M1 - 101247

ER -