Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Plurilingual practice in language teacher educa...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Plurilingual practice in language teacher education

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Plurilingual practice in language teacher education. / Potts, Diane; Cutrim Schmid, Euline.
In: AILA Review, Vol. 35, No. 1, 30.09.2022, p. 60-88.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Potts D, Cutrim Schmid E. Plurilingual practice in language teacher education. AILA Review. 2022 Sept 30;35(1):60-88. Epub 2022 Sept 27. doi: 10.1075/aila.22007.pot

Author

Bibtex

@article{02ca6eb2d67f4de28152694338f15b60,
title = "Plurilingual practice in language teacher education",
abstract = "Despite decades of research supporting the pedagogic value of learners{\textquoteright} plurilingual resources to their linguistic and academic development, pre-service teachers frequently arrive at university inculcated in {\textquoteleft}target language only{\textquoteright} practices underpinned by monoglossic ideologies. The challenge for teacher education is to productively disrupt quotidian beliefs about language beliefs and prompt reconsideration of future classroom practices. Drawing on the work of the Douglas Fir Group (2016), this paper explores the identities, beliefs and values of two student-teachers as they emerged over the length of an innovative English-German pedagogic project on plurilingualism. The project involved German student-teachers developing a language portrait project for Grade 6 students; student-teachers using project data for undergraduate assignments; and English MA students interviewing young learners about their language portraits via videoconference. The videoconference provided young learners further opportunities to use their plurilingual resources and MA students with data for assignments on identity and investment. Working with DFG{\textquoteright}s framework (2016), we examine the interplay of the meso- and macro-dimensions of the larger project{\textquoteright}s design and the sometimes contradictory indexing of values and identities within and across activities. Analysis reveals that design choices sometimes unintentionally reinforced linguistic ideologies inconsistent with the project{\textquoteright}s objectives, though these conflicts also led student-teachers to unexpected insights. We close with personal reflections on the implications of the first iteration of this design-based research project for the advancement of plurilingual pedagogies in teacher education.",
keywords = "classroom interventions, language education, language teacher education, plurilingualism, reflective practice, teacher beliefs",
author = "Diane Potts and {Cutrim Schmid}, Euline",
year = "2022",
month = sep,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1075/aila.22007.pot",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "60--88",
journal = "AILA Review",
issn = "1461-0213",
publisher = "John Benjamins Publishing Company",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Plurilingual practice in language teacher education

AU - Potts, Diane

AU - Cutrim Schmid, Euline

PY - 2022/9/30

Y1 - 2022/9/30

N2 - Despite decades of research supporting the pedagogic value of learners’ plurilingual resources to their linguistic and academic development, pre-service teachers frequently arrive at university inculcated in ‘target language only’ practices underpinned by monoglossic ideologies. The challenge for teacher education is to productively disrupt quotidian beliefs about language beliefs and prompt reconsideration of future classroom practices. Drawing on the work of the Douglas Fir Group (2016), this paper explores the identities, beliefs and values of two student-teachers as they emerged over the length of an innovative English-German pedagogic project on plurilingualism. The project involved German student-teachers developing a language portrait project for Grade 6 students; student-teachers using project data for undergraduate assignments; and English MA students interviewing young learners about their language portraits via videoconference. The videoconference provided young learners further opportunities to use their plurilingual resources and MA students with data for assignments on identity and investment. Working with DFG’s framework (2016), we examine the interplay of the meso- and macro-dimensions of the larger project’s design and the sometimes contradictory indexing of values and identities within and across activities. Analysis reveals that design choices sometimes unintentionally reinforced linguistic ideologies inconsistent with the project’s objectives, though these conflicts also led student-teachers to unexpected insights. We close with personal reflections on the implications of the first iteration of this design-based research project for the advancement of plurilingual pedagogies in teacher education.

AB - Despite decades of research supporting the pedagogic value of learners’ plurilingual resources to their linguistic and academic development, pre-service teachers frequently arrive at university inculcated in ‘target language only’ practices underpinned by monoglossic ideologies. The challenge for teacher education is to productively disrupt quotidian beliefs about language beliefs and prompt reconsideration of future classroom practices. Drawing on the work of the Douglas Fir Group (2016), this paper explores the identities, beliefs and values of two student-teachers as they emerged over the length of an innovative English-German pedagogic project on plurilingualism. The project involved German student-teachers developing a language portrait project for Grade 6 students; student-teachers using project data for undergraduate assignments; and English MA students interviewing young learners about their language portraits via videoconference. The videoconference provided young learners further opportunities to use their plurilingual resources and MA students with data for assignments on identity and investment. Working with DFG’s framework (2016), we examine the interplay of the meso- and macro-dimensions of the larger project’s design and the sometimes contradictory indexing of values and identities within and across activities. Analysis reveals that design choices sometimes unintentionally reinforced linguistic ideologies inconsistent with the project’s objectives, though these conflicts also led student-teachers to unexpected insights. We close with personal reflections on the implications of the first iteration of this design-based research project for the advancement of plurilingual pedagogies in teacher education.

KW - classroom interventions

KW - language education

KW - language teacher education

KW - plurilingualism

KW - reflective practice

KW - teacher beliefs

U2 - 10.1075/aila.22007.pot

DO - 10.1075/aila.22007.pot

M3 - Journal article

VL - 35

SP - 60

EP - 88

JO - AILA Review

JF - AILA Review

SN - 1461-0213

IS - 1

ER -