Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Political behavior does not (always) undermine ...


Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Political behavior does not (always) undermine strategic decision making: Theory and evidence

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Article number101943
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>31/10/2020
<mark>Journal</mark>Long Range Planning
Issue number5
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date25/09/20
<mark>Original language</mark>English


Political behavior pervades strategic decision-making, often damaging decision quality and undermining organizational performance. However, little is currently known about how top management teams (TMTs) cope with such behavior. To address this shortfall, we draw on the upper echelons literature to advance a contingent account of the factors that differentiate well-functioning and dysfunctional TMTs. Focusing on the psychological context surrounding the TMT, we theorize that cognitive consensus, power decentralization, and behavioral integration are key generative mechanisms that enable TMTs to countermand the potentially deleterious consequences of political behavior. We corroborate our theorizing using a field study of 117 strategic decisions, drawn from multiple TMT informants and secondary databases. Confirming the majority of our hypotheses, our findings indicate that behaviorally integrated and decentralized TMTs are better equipped to attenuate the potentially damaging effects of organizational politics, thereby safeguarding the quality of their decision processes.

Bibliographic note

Publisher Copyright: © 2019 Elsevier Ltd