Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Political spirituality

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Political spirituality: the devils, possession, and truth-telling

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Political spirituality: the devils, possession, and truth-telling. / Diken, Bulent.
In: Cultural Politics, Vol. 11, No. 1, 01.03.2015, p. 18-35.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Diken B. Political spirituality: the devils, possession, and truth-telling. Cultural Politics. 2015 Mar 1;11(1):18-35. doi: 10.1215/17432197-2842385

Author

Diken, Bulent. / Political spirituality : the devils, possession, and truth-telling. In: Cultural Politics. 2015 ; Vol. 11, No. 1. pp. 18-35.

Bibtex

@article{109282d08d8c47b78c6f396f002012f6,
title = "Political spirituality: the devils, possession, and truth-telling",
abstract = "The article thematizes the difference between superstition and faith through an allegorical double reading of social theory and Ken Russell{\textquoteright}s film The Devils. It discusses the political implications of this difference, contrasting the function of “love of God” in mysticism and in the governmental economy of the church. Crucially, love is originally a universal, immanent impulse, which is captured by religion. But if religion is an apparatus of capture, then the profanation of this universal core is possible. Religion cannot fully appropriate or exhaust the virtual potentiality of faith. By the same token, it becomes possible to distinguish religion and faith. Not all faith is religion and not all religion is faithful. The article draws on Foucault, discussing the possibility of a “political spirituality” outside the religious domain, as a profane, modern political gesture that cannot be reduced to theological notions. Finally, it turns to the relationship between political spirituality and political strategy.",
keywords = "The Devils, political spirituality, profanation, possession, kairos",
author = "Bulent Diken",
year = "2015",
month = mar,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1215/17432197-2842385",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "18--35",
journal = "Cultural Politics",
issn = "1743-2197",
publisher = "Berg Publishers",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Political spirituality

T2 - the devils, possession, and truth-telling

AU - Diken, Bulent

PY - 2015/3/1

Y1 - 2015/3/1

N2 - The article thematizes the difference between superstition and faith through an allegorical double reading of social theory and Ken Russell’s film The Devils. It discusses the political implications of this difference, contrasting the function of “love of God” in mysticism and in the governmental economy of the church. Crucially, love is originally a universal, immanent impulse, which is captured by religion. But if religion is an apparatus of capture, then the profanation of this universal core is possible. Religion cannot fully appropriate or exhaust the virtual potentiality of faith. By the same token, it becomes possible to distinguish religion and faith. Not all faith is religion and not all religion is faithful. The article draws on Foucault, discussing the possibility of a “political spirituality” outside the religious domain, as a profane, modern political gesture that cannot be reduced to theological notions. Finally, it turns to the relationship between political spirituality and political strategy.

AB - The article thematizes the difference between superstition and faith through an allegorical double reading of social theory and Ken Russell’s film The Devils. It discusses the political implications of this difference, contrasting the function of “love of God” in mysticism and in the governmental economy of the church. Crucially, love is originally a universal, immanent impulse, which is captured by religion. But if religion is an apparatus of capture, then the profanation of this universal core is possible. Religion cannot fully appropriate or exhaust the virtual potentiality of faith. By the same token, it becomes possible to distinguish religion and faith. Not all faith is religion and not all religion is faithful. The article draws on Foucault, discussing the possibility of a “political spirituality” outside the religious domain, as a profane, modern political gesture that cannot be reduced to theological notions. Finally, it turns to the relationship between political spirituality and political strategy.

KW - The Devils

KW - political spirituality

KW - profanation

KW - possession

KW - kairos

U2 - 10.1215/17432197-2842385

DO - 10.1215/17432197-2842385

M3 - Journal article

VL - 11

SP - 18

EP - 35

JO - Cultural Politics

JF - Cultural Politics

SN - 1743-2197

IS - 1

ER -