Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Postsecular reading of feelings in contemporary...

Electronic data

  • 2024RattanamathuwongPhD

    Final published version, 3.2 MB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 13/05/29

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Postsecular reading of feelings in contemporary Anglophone novels

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

Unpublished

Standard

Postsecular reading of feelings in contemporary Anglophone novels. / Rattanamathuwong, Bancha.
Lancaster University, 2024. 247 p.

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

Harvard

APA

Rattanamathuwong, B. (2024). Postsecular reading of feelings in contemporary Anglophone novels. [Doctoral Thesis, Lancaster University]. Lancaster University. https://doi.org/10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2331

Vancouver

Rattanamathuwong B. Postsecular reading of feelings in contemporary Anglophone novels. Lancaster University, 2024. 247 p. doi: 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2331

Author

Rattanamathuwong, Bancha. / Postsecular reading of feelings in contemporary Anglophone novels. Lancaster University, 2024. 247 p.

Bibtex

@phdthesis{d6a5435a4c7b4512b7a0b715180c7a5a,
title = "Postsecular reading of feelings in contemporary Anglophone novels",
abstract = "This thesis theorises postsecularism in relation to the representation of affectivities in contemporary Anglophone fiction. Employing a postsecular framework, it examines how the thematisations of emotions, feelings, or moods experienced by characters in the works of Ian McEwan, Kazuo Ishiguro, Margaret Atwood, and Ira Sukrungruang can lend themselves to a conceptual reconsideration of religiosity and secularity, both of which are commonly construed as opposite constructs. My argument is that these authors{\textquoteright} works can invite readers to negotiate the oppositional forces of beliefs and unbeliefs, and that from such negotiation can emerge reconfigured feelings which combine the sensibilities of both. This idea of negotiation is mainly shaped by Kevin Seidel{\textquoteright}s proposition of a hermeneutic framework that focuses more on complementary connections between the secular and the religious as opposed to one marked by antagonism. The inquiry in this thesis is built upon the observations made in the works of John McClure (2007), Andrew Tate (2008), Amy Hungerford (2010), Manav Ratti (2013), Justin Neuman (2014), Zhange Ni (2015), and Kevin Seidel (2021). These scholars{\textquoteright} works investigate the postsecular entanglements in modern fiction. My project however differs in its use of affects as a means by which postsecular experience can be conceptually theorised. By looking at feelings, such as love, forgiveness, re-enchantment, hope and curiosity, I argue that postsecular compromise is achieved through the reformulation of affects. The discussion of feelings will draw on theoretical texts by Jane Bennett (2001), Charles Taylor (2007), Lauren Berlant (2011), Sianne Ngai (2015), and Harmut Rosa (2021). Apart from the contribution to the scholarship in postsecularism and literature, the last chapter, which addresses issues concerning political theology in Thailand, will also add to the conversation on secularism in non-Anglo-American contexts.",
author = "Bancha Rattanamathuwong",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2331",
language = "English",
publisher = "Lancaster University",
school = "Lancaster University",

}

RIS

TY - BOOK

T1 - Postsecular reading of feelings in contemporary Anglophone novels

AU - Rattanamathuwong, Bancha

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - This thesis theorises postsecularism in relation to the representation of affectivities in contemporary Anglophone fiction. Employing a postsecular framework, it examines how the thematisations of emotions, feelings, or moods experienced by characters in the works of Ian McEwan, Kazuo Ishiguro, Margaret Atwood, and Ira Sukrungruang can lend themselves to a conceptual reconsideration of religiosity and secularity, both of which are commonly construed as opposite constructs. My argument is that these authors’ works can invite readers to negotiate the oppositional forces of beliefs and unbeliefs, and that from such negotiation can emerge reconfigured feelings which combine the sensibilities of both. This idea of negotiation is mainly shaped by Kevin Seidel’s proposition of a hermeneutic framework that focuses more on complementary connections between the secular and the religious as opposed to one marked by antagonism. The inquiry in this thesis is built upon the observations made in the works of John McClure (2007), Andrew Tate (2008), Amy Hungerford (2010), Manav Ratti (2013), Justin Neuman (2014), Zhange Ni (2015), and Kevin Seidel (2021). These scholars’ works investigate the postsecular entanglements in modern fiction. My project however differs in its use of affects as a means by which postsecular experience can be conceptually theorised. By looking at feelings, such as love, forgiveness, re-enchantment, hope and curiosity, I argue that postsecular compromise is achieved through the reformulation of affects. The discussion of feelings will draw on theoretical texts by Jane Bennett (2001), Charles Taylor (2007), Lauren Berlant (2011), Sianne Ngai (2015), and Harmut Rosa (2021). Apart from the contribution to the scholarship in postsecularism and literature, the last chapter, which addresses issues concerning political theology in Thailand, will also add to the conversation on secularism in non-Anglo-American contexts.

AB - This thesis theorises postsecularism in relation to the representation of affectivities in contemporary Anglophone fiction. Employing a postsecular framework, it examines how the thematisations of emotions, feelings, or moods experienced by characters in the works of Ian McEwan, Kazuo Ishiguro, Margaret Atwood, and Ira Sukrungruang can lend themselves to a conceptual reconsideration of religiosity and secularity, both of which are commonly construed as opposite constructs. My argument is that these authors’ works can invite readers to negotiate the oppositional forces of beliefs and unbeliefs, and that from such negotiation can emerge reconfigured feelings which combine the sensibilities of both. This idea of negotiation is mainly shaped by Kevin Seidel’s proposition of a hermeneutic framework that focuses more on complementary connections between the secular and the religious as opposed to one marked by antagonism. The inquiry in this thesis is built upon the observations made in the works of John McClure (2007), Andrew Tate (2008), Amy Hungerford (2010), Manav Ratti (2013), Justin Neuman (2014), Zhange Ni (2015), and Kevin Seidel (2021). These scholars’ works investigate the postsecular entanglements in modern fiction. My project however differs in its use of affects as a means by which postsecular experience can be conceptually theorised. By looking at feelings, such as love, forgiveness, re-enchantment, hope and curiosity, I argue that postsecular compromise is achieved through the reformulation of affects. The discussion of feelings will draw on theoretical texts by Jane Bennett (2001), Charles Taylor (2007), Lauren Berlant (2011), Sianne Ngai (2015), and Harmut Rosa (2021). Apart from the contribution to the scholarship in postsecularism and literature, the last chapter, which addresses issues concerning political theology in Thailand, will also add to the conversation on secularism in non-Anglo-American contexts.

U2 - 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2331

DO - 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2331

M3 - Doctoral Thesis

PB - Lancaster University

ER -