Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Poverty-of-the-stimulus and SLA epistemology

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Poverty-of-the-stimulus and SLA epistemology: Considering L2 knowledge of aspectual phrasal semantics

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Poverty-of-the-stimulus and SLA epistemology: Considering L2 knowledge of aspectual phrasal semantics. / Rothman, Jason; Iverson, Michael.
In: Language Acquisition, Vol. 15, No. 4, 31.12.2008, p. 270-314.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Rothman J, Iverson M. Poverty-of-the-stimulus and SLA epistemology: Considering L2 knowledge of aspectual phrasal semantics. Language Acquisition. 2008 Dec 31;15(4):270-314. Epub 2008 Oct 10. doi: 10.1080/10489220802352206

Author

Rothman, Jason ; Iverson, Michael. / Poverty-of-the-stimulus and SLA epistemology : Considering L2 knowledge of aspectual phrasal semantics. In: Language Acquisition. 2008 ; Vol. 15, No. 4. pp. 270-314.

Bibtex

@article{6701eae252534f9caf83e70ae92fdf2b,
title = "Poverty-of-the-stimulus and SLA epistemology: Considering L2 knowledge of aspectual phrasal semantics",
abstract = "Coupling a review of previous studies on the acquisition of grammatical aspects undertaken from contrasting paradigmatic views of second language acquisition (SLA) with new experimental data from L2 Portuguese, the present study contributes to this specific literature as well as general debates in L2 epistemology. We tested 31 adult English learners of L2 Portuguese across three experiments, examining the extent to which they had acquired the syntax and (subtle) semantics of grammatical aspect. Demonstrating that many individuals acquired target knowledge of what we contend is a poverty-of-the-stimulus semantic entailment related to the checking of aspectual features encoded in Portuguese preterit and imperfect morphology (see also Goodin-Mayeda and Rothman (2007), Montrul and Slabakova (2003), Slabakova and Montrul (2003)), namely, a [±accidental] distinction that obtains in a restricted subset of contexts, we conclude that UG-based approaches to SLA are in a better position to tap and gauge underlying morphosyntactic competence, since based on independent theoretical linguistic descriptions, they make falsifiable predictions that are amenable to empirical scrutiny, seek to describe and explain beyond performance, and can account for L2 convergence on poverty-of-the-stimulus knowledge as well as L2 variability/optionality (e.g., Lardiere (2007), Prevost and White (2000), Goad and White (2006), Slabakova (2008)).",
author = "Jason Rothman and Michael Iverson",
year = "2008",
month = dec,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1080/10489220802352206",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "270--314",
journal = "Language Acquisition",
issn = "1048-9223",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Poverty-of-the-stimulus and SLA epistemology

T2 - Considering L2 knowledge of aspectual phrasal semantics

AU - Rothman, Jason

AU - Iverson, Michael

PY - 2008/12/31

Y1 - 2008/12/31

N2 - Coupling a review of previous studies on the acquisition of grammatical aspects undertaken from contrasting paradigmatic views of second language acquisition (SLA) with new experimental data from L2 Portuguese, the present study contributes to this specific literature as well as general debates in L2 epistemology. We tested 31 adult English learners of L2 Portuguese across three experiments, examining the extent to which they had acquired the syntax and (subtle) semantics of grammatical aspect. Demonstrating that many individuals acquired target knowledge of what we contend is a poverty-of-the-stimulus semantic entailment related to the checking of aspectual features encoded in Portuguese preterit and imperfect morphology (see also Goodin-Mayeda and Rothman (2007), Montrul and Slabakova (2003), Slabakova and Montrul (2003)), namely, a [±accidental] distinction that obtains in a restricted subset of contexts, we conclude that UG-based approaches to SLA are in a better position to tap and gauge underlying morphosyntactic competence, since based on independent theoretical linguistic descriptions, they make falsifiable predictions that are amenable to empirical scrutiny, seek to describe and explain beyond performance, and can account for L2 convergence on poverty-of-the-stimulus knowledge as well as L2 variability/optionality (e.g., Lardiere (2007), Prevost and White (2000), Goad and White (2006), Slabakova (2008)).

AB - Coupling a review of previous studies on the acquisition of grammatical aspects undertaken from contrasting paradigmatic views of second language acquisition (SLA) with new experimental data from L2 Portuguese, the present study contributes to this specific literature as well as general debates in L2 epistemology. We tested 31 adult English learners of L2 Portuguese across three experiments, examining the extent to which they had acquired the syntax and (subtle) semantics of grammatical aspect. Demonstrating that many individuals acquired target knowledge of what we contend is a poverty-of-the-stimulus semantic entailment related to the checking of aspectual features encoded in Portuguese preterit and imperfect morphology (see also Goodin-Mayeda and Rothman (2007), Montrul and Slabakova (2003), Slabakova and Montrul (2003)), namely, a [±accidental] distinction that obtains in a restricted subset of contexts, we conclude that UG-based approaches to SLA are in a better position to tap and gauge underlying morphosyntactic competence, since based on independent theoretical linguistic descriptions, they make falsifiable predictions that are amenable to empirical scrutiny, seek to describe and explain beyond performance, and can account for L2 convergence on poverty-of-the-stimulus knowledge as well as L2 variability/optionality (e.g., Lardiere (2007), Prevost and White (2000), Goad and White (2006), Slabakova (2008)).

U2 - 10.1080/10489220802352206

DO - 10.1080/10489220802352206

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:54049113833

VL - 15

SP - 270

EP - 314

JO - Language Acquisition

JF - Language Acquisition

SN - 1048-9223

IS - 4

ER -