Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Power, causality and normativity: a critical re...
View graph of relations

Power, causality and normativity: a critical realist critique of Foucault

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Power, causality and normativity: a critical realist critique of Foucault. / Sayer, Andrew.

In: Journal of Political Power, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2012, p. 179-194.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Sayer, Andrew. / Power, causality and normativity: a critical realist critique of Foucault. In: Journal of Political Power. 2012 ; Vol. 5, No. 2. pp. 179-194.

Bibtex

@article{8736799f27b341fca3cddb4afb858c7a,
title = "Power, causality and normativity: a critical realist critique of Foucault",
abstract = "A critical realist account is developed of two aspects of the study of power which are normally left implicit: the theory of causation presupposed and the way in which the normative connotations of power are dealt with. These matters are discussed partly by reference to Foucault{\textquoteright}s views on power, particularly as set out in Volume 1 of The History of Sexuality. Regarding the conception of power as ubiquitous, it is argued this is not incompatible with concepts of causation or of power as deriving from the capacities of objects; indeed dispersed power presupposes causality and causal powers. Other concepts such as emergent powers, fields, structures and ecological dominance are also assessed from a critical realist standpoint. In the second part it is argued that the normative implications of power should not be evaded, and indeed that evaluation of the implications of power for flourishing and suffering are necessary for adequate description and explanation in social science. Positivist and Foucauldian refusals of normativity are critiqued by reference to the untenability of the fact-value and is-ought distinctions and the necessity of thick ethical concepts in social science. It is concluded that students of power should embrace causality and normativity.",
keywords = "critical realism, causality, normativity, dispersed power, Foucault",
author = "Andrew Sayer",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1080/2158379X.2012.698898",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "179--194",
journal = "Journal of Political Power",
issn = "2158-379X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Power, causality and normativity: a critical realist critique of Foucault

AU - Sayer, Andrew

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - A critical realist account is developed of two aspects of the study of power which are normally left implicit: the theory of causation presupposed and the way in which the normative connotations of power are dealt with. These matters are discussed partly by reference to Foucault’s views on power, particularly as set out in Volume 1 of The History of Sexuality. Regarding the conception of power as ubiquitous, it is argued this is not incompatible with concepts of causation or of power as deriving from the capacities of objects; indeed dispersed power presupposes causality and causal powers. Other concepts such as emergent powers, fields, structures and ecological dominance are also assessed from a critical realist standpoint. In the second part it is argued that the normative implications of power should not be evaded, and indeed that evaluation of the implications of power for flourishing and suffering are necessary for adequate description and explanation in social science. Positivist and Foucauldian refusals of normativity are critiqued by reference to the untenability of the fact-value and is-ought distinctions and the necessity of thick ethical concepts in social science. It is concluded that students of power should embrace causality and normativity.

AB - A critical realist account is developed of two aspects of the study of power which are normally left implicit: the theory of causation presupposed and the way in which the normative connotations of power are dealt with. These matters are discussed partly by reference to Foucault’s views on power, particularly as set out in Volume 1 of The History of Sexuality. Regarding the conception of power as ubiquitous, it is argued this is not incompatible with concepts of causation or of power as deriving from the capacities of objects; indeed dispersed power presupposes causality and causal powers. Other concepts such as emergent powers, fields, structures and ecological dominance are also assessed from a critical realist standpoint. In the second part it is argued that the normative implications of power should not be evaded, and indeed that evaluation of the implications of power for flourishing and suffering are necessary for adequate description and explanation in social science. Positivist and Foucauldian refusals of normativity are critiqued by reference to the untenability of the fact-value and is-ought distinctions and the necessity of thick ethical concepts in social science. It is concluded that students of power should embrace causality and normativity.

KW - critical realism

KW - causality

KW - normativity

KW - dispersed power

KW - Foucault

U2 - 10.1080/2158379X.2012.698898

DO - 10.1080/2158379X.2012.698898

M3 - Journal article

VL - 5

SP - 179

EP - 194

JO - Journal of Political Power

JF - Journal of Political Power

SN - 2158-379X

IS - 2

ER -