Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Power, control, communities and health inequali...

Electronic data

  • Part_II_CIC_power_trilogy_markers_.FINAL_HPI_Feb_2020

    Rights statement: This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Health Promotion International following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Ruth Ponsford, Michelle Collins, Matt Egan, Emma Halliday, Sue Lewis, Lois Orton, Kate Powell, Amy Barnes, Sarah Salway, Anne Townsend, Margaret Whitehead, Jennie Popay, Power, control, communities and health inequalities. Part II: measuring shifts in power, Health Promotion International, 2020;, daaa019, https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaa019 is available online at: [url]

    Accepted author manuscript, 289 KB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 31/12/21

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Power, control, communities and health inequalities. Part II: measuring shifts in power

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

E-pub ahead of print
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>31/12/2020
<mark>Journal</mark>Health Promotion International
Number of pages10
Publication StatusE-pub ahead of print
Early online date31/12/20
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

In the health field, there is great interest in the role empowerment might play in reducing social inequalities in health. Empowerment is understood here as the processes of developing capabilities that individuals and/or communities need to exercise control over decisions and actions impacting on their lives and health. There is a fundamental problem, however, in identifying and measuring capabilities for collective control that emerge at the level of the collective, with much of the existing literature focusing on individual measures even where community-level processes are concerned. Collective measures need to capture the dynamics of interactions within and between groups, not simply aggregate individual-level measures. This article, Part 2 in a three-part series, takes up the challenge of identifying qualitative markers of capabilities for collective control. We applied the emancipatory power framework (EPF) reported in Part 1 of the series, to qualitative data generated during a longitudinal evaluation of a major English area-based empowerment initiative, the Big Local (BL). We identified empirical 'markers' of shifts towards greater collective control pertaining to each of the 'power' dimensions in the EPF-'power within', 'power with' and 'power to'-and markers of communities exercising 'power over' other institutions/community members. These markers can usefully be applied in the evaluation planning and evaluation of empowerment initiatives. Part 3 in the series uses these markers and a second analytical framework developed during our evaluation of BL to explore how power dynamics unfold in participatory spaces in BL neighbourhoods.

Bibliographic note

This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Health Promotion International following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Ruth Ponsford, Michelle Collins, Matt Egan, Emma Halliday, Sue Lewis, Lois Orton, Kate Powell, Amy Barnes, Sarah Salway, Anne Townsend, Margaret Whitehead, Jennie Popay, Power, control, communities and health inequalities. Part II: measuring shifts in power, Health Promotion International, 2020;, daaa019, https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaa019 is available online at: [url]